@LegisClear@MrBeast Exactly. All in all I do not trust humanity to the extent that I’d believe even 50% could conceivably agree on a vote to save us all, hence why I’d argue for everyone to just vote red.
@MrBeast …You’re choosing the only option that guarantees you stay alive regardless of what the crowd does. The messed up part? The more "rational" everyone acts, the faster the majority shifts to Red. In the end, the only people who actually die are the ones who had faith in humanity.
@MrBeast …If they panic and hit Red just to be "safe," and they end up being the majority, I’m dead just for trying to be the "good guy." So, you hit Red. Not because you’re a villain, but as insurance against everyone else’s fear….
@Wisdom_HQ I’d take $2B immediately. Not because it’s the better option if greed is your goal, but because a $1 doubling daily with no defined end would have global repercussions on monetary value that I don’t really want to deal with.
@Niro4Everr@rbisrb A simple analogy: I tell you that I have a billion dollars without evidence. You can disbelieve that claim without believing that I do in fact NOT have a billion dollars. Disbelief in a claim is not the same as believing the inverse proposition.