@skwp Here's the thing you need to think about. If AI is so smart and so useful, why are we even asking it to write software to solve problems for us? Shouldn't the AI just do the thing we need?
A company in China is working on AI that examines location data and internet use to predict who could do or say something critical of the government https://t.co/22OCLegEBx
I've got an agent in a loop optimizing a renderer with the goal to minimize frame times (and tests to measure). It got times down from 88ms to 2ms and allocations down from ~150K to 500. Sounds good, right? Wrong. This is exactly why agent psychosis is a big fucking problem.
As an experiment, I rewrote the Ghostty core render state in Go, with access to identically laid out data structures as Ghostty and the exact same validation tests. I made a purposely naive renderer (simple, correct, but slow). 88ms per frame with 150,000 allocations (horrendous, lol)!
I then kickstarted a Ralph loop to bring the frame times down. I told it it can't modify input data structures or the public API or tests (they're correct), but it can do anything else it wants. It got to work.
It has worked for about 4 hours. I've spent around $350 on this experiment so far. The results?
88ms => 1.5ms
150K allocs => ~500 allocs
Incredible right? Nope.
My hand-written renderer I ported has frame times (same benchmark) of ~20us (0.020ms) and 0 allocations in the update path.
This is the problem with psychosis and lacking systems understanding. If you don't understand the system, you're going to accept that this is an incredible result. If you understand the system, you'll see better solutions immediately and can do roughly 75x better on throughput.
The people who blindly trust agent output are in the former camp. They're sheeple, overdrinking from a fountain of mediocrity.
Standard disclaimer: I use AI all the time. I like AI. The point I'm making is to not blindly accept results. Think. Analyze. Learn.
@GovCox@SpencerJCox Addressing environmental concerns is great, but those are not the only concerns with data center projects. Why are they getting tax breaks when the rest of us have to pay full taxes? Why do they get special privileges through MIDA when the rest of us don't?
EXCLUSIVE: Former Congressman and rumored candidate for Governor, @jasoninthehouse discloses a financial connection to the Stratos data center project in Box Elder County, telling @abc4utah that he will be paid for his consulting work connecting a group of developers to @kevinolearytv if the project gets built.
https://t.co/ecLXEMBMTq
PICARD: Data, shields up
DATA: Brilliant! Shields can reduce damage we sustain. Not immunity. Not hubris. Just prudence. It's not precautionโit's strategy.
[camera shakes]
WORF: HULL BREACHES ON NINE DECKS
DATA: Here's what happened: you told me to raise shields, and I didn't
@KSLcom@SpencerJCox Look, if this involves tax breaks or changes to zoning laws or anything else, make those across the board changes that apply to everyone in the state, not just the few businesses YOU want to have here. That's the only ethical and fair way to do this
The Trump FDA story is crazy
Big Tobacco donated $5,000,000 to Trump's super PAC
Two days later, Reynolds American's executives met with Trump at his Florida golf club to demand the FDA reverse its flavored vape ban
Trump then personally called RFK Jr. and his health secretary to complain about the ban
Then questioned the FDA commissioner directly for not moving fast enough
The FDA commissioner who said no resigned days later and so did RFK Jr.'s chief spokesperson, citing the vape policy as the reason
Then the ban was lifted within a week
The White House says it had nothing to do with the $5,000,000