@CVPR When in doubt about what session to attend with a conflicting schedule, select the session with a great speaker even if the topic is not perfectly aligned with your interest. You will end up learning more from a good representation
@CVPR a lot of students won't be able to make it due to not being able to get a US visa.
Wouldn't it be rather fair to allow them to reduce their registration from in-person to online?
@CSProfKGD Not sure how will it prevent reviewers from asking and ACs from accepting. I can easily report quantitative numbers in the text. Plus, adding qualitative results sometimes helps a lot to convince reviewers
@jon_barron Agreed. A possible name for this AI-> "Border Collie".
It should be possible to fine-tune existing LLMs with reviews written by outstanding reviewers of past conferences.
@frncswllms @gadelha_m @ylecun Great idea! I think openreview can be converted into this as researchers are already associated with this.
Though, there might be a constant need of moderators
Want to hear a friend in a noisy cafรฉ? We designed deep learning-based headphones that let you isolate the speech from a specific person just by *looking* at them for a few seconds. CHI'24 honorable mention award.
Paper: https://t.co/hEP5daf8XB
Code: https://t.co/FmEE16TGEi
@IAmEricHedlin This will violate doubly blinded system. But we can have a universal reviewer rating (score assigned to a reviewer by ACs) that is publicly available
Maybe we should have an LLM for reviewers that guides them to write a better review.
Perhaps a condescending LLM that berates reviewers for writing crappy reviews e.g. "Is this the best you can write as weakness?" or "Do you even research bro?"