@DavidLe76335983 I've heard of shifting the burden of proof, but this takes it to a new level when you can't even articulate what you disagree with. Oh well, hitchens razor.
@leoncsm@9jaemperor@SprinterPress That's false. They don't possess an ICBM capable of reaching the US mainland from Iran, but that doesn't mean they can't hit the US or allies with a nuclear payload. At the end of yr 15, what quantitative limits did the JCPOA impose on Iran's enrichment program.
@ShaykhSulaiman You can't be this stupid. Read the post. If you think the point is the terms under which Iran must surrender, it just went over your head.
@leoncsm@9jaemperor@SprinterPress I cannot think of a more absurd claim. They've been involved directly or indirectly in virtually every US conflict, largely through the financing of their proxy terror network. At the end of yr 15, what quantitative limits did the JCPOA impose on Iran's enrichment program
@RobertG49643388@BrettErickson28 Robert is right. They were concerned about economic impacts leaving it off especially when the so called ceasefire removed justification. They're not eying Chinese style censorship because they're a regime "cemented" in power. It's because they worry about their population.