@coverage_cowboy@MarioNawfal Empirically untrue, Britain got rid of its crime problem by decades of capital punishment for these types of people and removing them from the gene pool which worked very effectively
@Yashs_Take@TheRealEuryAZ@LaurenWitzkeDE Sure, that’s why Indians that move to first world countries with resources and robust garbage disposal systems still get routinely caught dumping trash in nature and rivers lmao
@michonne_walker@akafaceUS Mainly because the kid who is now grown said that being pushed into this ruined his life, he’s chemically castrated for life and will have other side effects from the hormones and puberty blockers taken at a young age.
@thinkwithakupp@Hankthealien@mokhanhim Guys retarded, “we aren’t victims, we only have multiple gatherings of wealthy and prominent jews (world Jewish congress) (AJC) where all we do is sit around and talk about how long we have been victims and how to leverage our victimhood in order to further Jewish interests!”
@arrkay87 @JackWor94775747@L0m3z@grok That’s simply not true. You first boasted about Indians outside of India having a 99 iq (literally below the white American avg) then turn around and lie saying that 99 is the whole of indias avg. You are showing your inborn Indian retardedness and proclivity to lie…
If you "literally judge individuals on the basis of their conduct or individual attributes," say, in the context of hiring employees by administering cognitive aptitude tests, you will get sued for racial discrimination and go out of business. *Literally.*
Just so you see how the psy-op works, the NYT paints two men as morally equivalent:
Man 1 is a law abiding American who did nothing wrong. Had his identity stolen, life thrown into chaos.
Man 2 is an illegal alien, broke into the country multiple times, deported multiple times, stole an innocent American’s Social Security number, had multiple DUIs and killed a grandfather playing with his 9-year-old granddaughter.
There is no moral equivalence here. One is guilty, the other is innocent. One deserves strict consequences, the other sympathy and justice.
Free your mind from psy op.
However bad you think Reagan was, he’s actually worse.
He granted amnesty to 3 million illegals and nearly doubled the number of legal migrants coming into the US.
He appointed justices who preserved Roe v. Wade for another 30 years and supported the expand in expansion and normalization of abortion
He paved the way for the public school system to eventually indoctrinate kids into gender ideology when he worked to sabotage the Briggs Initiative.
He blew up the deficit and set the stage for hyper financialization at the same time, two things which only fueled the institutional power of the Left over the long run.
He provided cover for the Neocon hijacking of the GOP against the Paleocons.
And don’t even get me started on the immense amount of damage the whole “propositional nation” narrative did to the long term trajectory of this country.
Reagan was one of the chief people who promoted this worldview on the Right, blinding it to the fact that our own country was being stolen away from us until the Obama era came along and it became impossible to ignore any longer.
A century ago, President Calvin Coolidge signed into law The Immigration Act of 1924.
He stated plainly, "New arrivals should be limited to our own capacity to absorb them. America must be kept American. For this purpose, it is now necessary to enact a policy of restricted immigration."
The 1924 Act passed the House and Senate with overwhelming support. Democrats AND Republicans agreed. The bill introduced tight immigration quotas, new visa requirements, the Border Patrol, and outright banned immigrants from certain countries that we viewed as incompatible with our culture.
It dramatically reduced the number of people coming into the country, and provided an opportunity for the recent "great wave" of immigrants to assimilate. By the 1940's and 1950's, American society thrived with a boomimg economy, rising middle class, common culture and limited immigration.
The Act was in place until 1965. Since then, we have experienced decades of *historic* immigration, both legal and illegal. Today we have higher levels of foreign-born than the early 1900’s by both raw number and percentage of population. This mass immigration has also included vastly different cultures than the mostly Europeans we accepted then. It’s obvious that we once again need to make a national policy shift, and it should be bipartisan…
It’s time for another Immigration Act.
This is a total lie. America, historically, was NOT “multicultural.” The first non-White group to be given citizenship was a small group of less than 10,000 choctaw, more than 50 years after the country’s founding. Every founding father was dead except Monroe, who died 5 months later. Blacks gained citizenship almost 50 years after that, in 1868 – at which point America was about 85% White. The rest of the red indians weren’t given citizenship for more than another 50 years, in 1924 – at which point America was 90% White.
America’s demographics didn’t start to majorly shift away from Anglo-Saxons until the Hart-Celler act was introduced in 1965. Even in 1969, when America landed on the moon, the country was 89% White. As late as 1980, America was 80% White. As late as 1990, America was 75% White. As late as 2000, America was 75% White. In less than 25 years, that shrunk to just 56% (likely lower – it is obvious we have been lied to about the amount of illegals in America). The “multicultural” America that you’ve been sold is a complete sham, and a completely modern invention. And America is in worse shape than it has ever been. Think about that: when America was 89% White, we landed on the moon. Now, at <56% White, we allow violent criminals to walk the streets after being arrested and released dozens of times. You do the math – it’s not hard.