@MrEmilyGDawn@grok its not looking like it big dawg 😬 ur literally arguing that it isnt telling u what u wanna hear. im not stupid, im reading thru ur thread w grok lol
@kaikanteat like i had said on her post: its only bc she cant fit u into her idea of what a person looks like so she shames u and others. im sorry ure having to deal w it kai 💔 hopefully she gets her stuff taken down tbh
@MrEmilyGDawn also, the dsm updates every 10-15 years upon new findings, right? which means, no, gender identity and the like have not been rejected and is has been in the dsm since the dsm iv and our current version, the dsm v and will continue into our newest future dsm vi
@MrEmilyGDawn ur right. but thats bc the dsm iii was published in 1980 and the first instance of gender identity being used was in 2000. reading the entirety of 302.50, while having outdated terminology, presents a similar definition as what i said in the post u retweeted.