Unfortunately, no one cares 😭
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
we’ll remind you
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
Scabies has spread all over my child's body I am worried about my baby girl😭
https://t.co/45Gj0rpJam
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
♥️ I LOVE ALLAH♥️
#خاتم_النبیین_محمدﷺ#درود_وقرآن
Om namah Shivay🙌
O
s
i
n
f
u
l
m
i
n
d
!
S
i
n
g
t
h
e
L
o
r
d’
s
p
r
a
i
s
e
s
i
y
o
u
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
c
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
n
m
a
e
t
h
e
e
f
f
o
r
t
u
w
i
l
l
r
e
g
ret deeply later, when the bird flies out of the cage
Then you will only be left wringing your hands @grok 🚩
Everyone says AI makes you faster.
The real advantage is that it helps you remember.
The video compared three very different approaches for building a Second Brain with Obsidian.
- Obsidian + Claude Code -> best reasoning and long-term memory. Great if you want AI that understands years of notes instead of starting every chat from scratch.
- OpenClaw -> an always-on AI agent with a huge community skill library. Great for automation, but every community skill should be reviewed before installing.
- Hermes Agent -> the most interesting idea. It creates new skills after completing tasks, so over time it needs fewer prompts and adapts to how you work.
The creator's recommendation wasn't to pick one.
It was to build your own stack:
- Obsidian for memory.
- Claude Code for reasoning.
- Selected OpenClaw skills for automation.
- Ideas from Hermes for self-improving workflows.
That way your knowledge stays yours, while the AI layer can change as better models appear.
The business opportunity isn't selling prompts.
It's helping companies organize knowledge, automate workflows, document processes, and build internal AI systems.
Typical projects range from $500 to $10,000+, while experienced AI consultants often build recurring retainers worth $5k–20k+/month.
AI writes.
Your knowledge compounds.
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
Allah
♥️ I LOVE ALLAH♥️
#خاتم_النبیین_محمدﷺ#درود_وقرآن
I BEG YOU😭
Stop please😭
My child is dying😭
Don't ignore
beg you
Help me
I need Diapers
beg you
Help me
I need MILK
I need MILK
I need MILK
I need MILK
BEG YOU
I need MILK
I need MILK
I need MILK
I need MILK
I need MILK
Help me😭https://t.co/KnUANvXTgk
The girl smiling at you with the protein water, telling you it changed her workout - she was born ten minutes ago and doesn't exist.
Somebody typed one sentence into Claude. "Create a natural UGC video using this product." Claude handed it to a second tool. Out came a real-looking person, in real-looking daylight, giving a real-sounding review of a drink she has never tasted.
No casting. No filming. No creator to pay, no shoot to schedule, no product to ship to anyone.
For years this was a whole industry. Brands paid people $200 to $2,000 a video to hold their thing and talk about it on camera. Agencies took a cut. Creators built careers on it.
That entire chain just collapsed into a text box.
One person, at a desk, can now spin up twenty different "customers" before lunch. Different faces, different voices, different rooms, each one recommending the same product like they found it themselves.
The guy in the video puts a number on it - $120,000 from running this process. Take the number with salt; take the shift seriously.
Because the shift is real whether his figure is or not. The ad that looks the least like an ad - the shaky selfie, the girl mid-run, the "I never post about brands but" - was the one format AI wasn't supposed to be able to fake.
It just faked it. And it faked it better than most humans do it.
The polished commercial was always obviously a commercial.
The one that looks like your friend recommending something is the one you can't tell anymore.