@WilliamR1961@mtracey The 'Lord' says that children are the example to follow. He said this to men of 'the law,' who seemed to have a habit of thinking they were above the next. It's a lesson in humility, not child abuse.
If we could peek in your closet, what might 'justice' demand for you?
@WilliamR1961@mtracey Feel free to 'accept' anything you like, but please don't misconstrue a human construct with a biblical concept. If anything, it's 'your' concept. If you want to thirst for vengeance, by all means. You won't have to worry about being alone as that gate is rather wide.
@WilliamR1961@mtracey I don't give credence to what 'man' says as they all sit in the exact same boat as Ms. Clancy, guilty before God. This is why I originally challenged the eye for eye concept. That is a 'human' concept.
From my perspective, this is a family matter. Not a public one.
@WilliamR1961@mtracey The writer calls them commandments and he determined the order in which they were written, not God. The writer also chose the phrase, "God said."
Therefore, when I read a story within about slavery or eye for an eye, I never attribute it to God. That's the writers perspective.
@WilliamR1961@mtracey The commandments weren't given as a guide, but more so a mirror. I believe Paul refers to it all as the 'ministry of death.'
All of the 'eye for an eye' and 'thou shalt not,' wasn't written as a guide to follow. Those who read it that way fall into what Paul calls a 'curse.'
@WilliamR1961@mtracey I understand what you're saying, but I never read the bible through that lens, so I don't think of the stories in terms of 'concepts' and 'rules of conduct.' The same spirit of people that penned slavery are the same that penned eye for an eye, and Jesus corrected them both.
@MisterMandark@RealPaulElam "Grooming - the care of a body and its physical appearance."
"Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out..."
I wonder if you actually read what was stated, or just reacted? I'm guessing the latter.
@WilliamR1961@mtracey The biblical concept of slavery was literally penned by men. Interpreted by men. Carried out by men. The same men responsible for eye for an eye.
@PhineusPhineus@MakeGoldGreat You called it an 'analysis', but then your mind converted it to 'rhetoric.'
What a person 'says' is not always the same as what a person 'hears.'
You read these words and hear doom. That's totally on you. If we reach 40 quadrillion, it doesn't nullify what was stated.
@BreeSolstad@emma_doell You're paradigm is distorting both 'what' you're hearing and 'how' you're hearing it.
Seeing someone on stage giving an analogy doesn't make them a pastor, and the theme of the story isn't the espresso.
'He that has ears, let him hear.'