Historian of 20th/21st c. US & the world, drug plants, drug wars, political economy, environment. Working on coca in Bolivia, 1970s-now. TX native, dog mama.
@joefrancis505 Um no, not at all equivalent. If a reference is REAL but the interpretation wrong, anyone can go to the cited source and analyze the content themselves. If a reference is hallucinated, THERE IS NO SOURCE to either confirm or refute the interpretation. It is a loop without exit.
Retraction—Today, we retract an unsigned 1977 commentary suggesting talc powder containing asbestos was not harmful. The Lancet was informed that the author had undisclosed competing interests and breached publication ethics. /4
Why do “life-long” medications elicit such opposition? Is it some Calvinist moral economy or aversion to the welfare state (aka social democracy)? Why must human bodies & health be “fixed” in limited periods of time, rather than treated over lifetimes? https://t.co/I8HS2lQOIn
Solidarity with Mahmoud Khalil✊, and all international students at US universities. One of the greatest strengths of US higher education is its international students, and heartbroken to see that so cruelly and arbitrarily threatened with absolutely zero evidence.
@_waldo_was_here Sending lots of self-compassionate vibes 🤗 It is fucking hard and it doesn’t stop, but one day, one step, one minute, one second at a time.
I repeat from yesterday: all of that information was freely accessible online up until the current administration took control and removed that database from being publicly available