Blub

degree in astrophysics, masters in physics, masters in aerospace engineering use all of this to argue with flat earthers... waste of education tbh

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@OfficialFV you guys delivered a broken table few weeks back I've been trying to arrange delivery of the replacement but no one at Warrington is answering the phone I've been on hold for an hour and a half today and I've called a few times this week, any help? Please

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@realimtan @EricLDaugh russia was kicked out for invading ukraine.... they invaded ukraine while in the G8 what makes you think them still being in it would have made a difference?

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@MilenaAmit

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@sarahcccccc @mitsyarty Bsl or Welsh? Maybe not ending all translators would be a good idea

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@AlwaysFrosted2 @Zeteticzz Sure it's a high radiation area you would not want to stay in it but they don't stay in it for long hence the dose isn't that high remember it's the dose that makes the poison.

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@Zeteticzz I'll take it you can't answer a simple question then and just explain, orbital mechanics are far more complex than just aim at the moon and go that's a very inefficient way to get to the moon so it's not how it's done instead you use gravity assist

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@AlwaysFrosted2 @Zeteticzz 300 rad is considered to be lethal given transit times van Allen belt is about 14 rad far from the lethal dose and that's assuming no radiation shielding

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@Zeteticzz https://t.co/ybhmOHaH2K

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@Zeteticzz I see you really can't back up your ideas or answer a simple question, do you really think it's as simple as point at the moon and fire the rockets?

I also haven't played pokemon in over a decade now not that thats relevant. I am also not trolling its a simple question.

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@JonatanD2045 @DrWholastregen @SkepticWolf @NotEvolution1 @PeterHutcho @Gecko1114 yeah by passing peer review it shows there work is valid not thats its true, hence specifically saying "just if its valid"

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@Zeteticzz I see you really can't back up your ideas or answer a simple question, do you really think it's as simple as point at the moon and fire the rockets?

I also haven't played pokemon in over a decade now not that thats relevant. I am also not trolling its a simple question.

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@DrWholastregen @SkepticWolf @JonatanD2045 @NotEvolution1 @PeterHutcho @Gecko1114 so its called germ theory do you think that germs aren't fact? or electromagnets after all its electromagnetic theory not electromagnetic fact?

consider that theory in scientific terms doesn't mean the same as in every day use because well it doesn't.

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@Zeteticzz yes orbital flight mechanics are a little more complex than driving a car its not just head straight.

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@Zeteticzz ahh I see you have gone for the follower argument solid that one defiantly wins the debate I think that ones called Ad Populum. No do try to answer do you really think it's as simple as point at the moon and fire the rockets?

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@DrWholastregen @SkepticWolf @JonatanD2045 @NotEvolution1 @PeterHutcho @Gecko1114 firstly theory in science is not the same as its colloquial use theory's in science is the highest form of proven there is, hence germ theory it's not called germ fact.

Facts don't change but our understanding of things does and thats what science adapts to religion does not.

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@jarlskane @Zeteticzz yeah it does orbital geometries and flight paths area bit more complex than "aim at the moon and fire up the rockets"

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@Zeteticzz do.. do you think its as simple at point at the moon and ignite the rockets? its a little more complex than that...

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@damianrobinson_ @shaunoftheglobe like a ring laser gyroscope? you know those things that show the earths spin not using the sky at all?

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@DrWholastregen @SkepticWolf @JonatanD2045 @NotEvolution1 @PeterHutcho @Gecko1114 The thing is when someone lies others come prove them wrong science is self correcting like that. If somthing is wrong it will be shown to be wrong it can take some time but anyone lying about anything of note will be quickly proven wrong.

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@DrWholastregen @SkepticWolf @JonatanD2045 @NotEvolution1 @PeterHutcho @Gecko1114 I even said it does happen but published science has mechanisms to keep it out. From establish protocol (double blind etc.) peer review, replication studies, experiments etc. Somthing is wrong in your paper other people will find it and show it

[Blub @Beeeezebub]

@DrWholastregen @SkepticWolf @JonatanD2045 @NotEvolution1 @PeterHutcho @Gecko1114 do you know what a peer review is? to summarise its a bunch of experts in the field who will try to rip your work apart like hungry parana they care not for your research just if it is valid yeah bias happens but in good journals its kept out