The contract is valid. That’s been admitted to.
His “other disgusting behavior” that you seem to be okay with and somehow don’t think is rooted in morality includes posting a website mocking the couple on what was supposed to be their wedding day, not just his other convictions in a court of law.
Is it morally wrong to openly mock someone’s loss, regardless of whether or not you had an enforceable contract? (Consider that rhetorical, since I don’t value your opinion.)
It’s ironic to claim someone is guilty of moral supremacy when you express your own opinion on moral matters without any of your own authority.
Go to hell, dumbass.
@StonesThrones@MorbidKnowledge The dude was convicted for fraud multiple times in multiple states and continues to harm people. But, sure, “the contract.” Not sure how that excuses his other disgusting behavior but okay.
People can be both mentally ill and want to follow Christ. And we shouldn’t expect their behavior to make sense, being that they’re ill, but that doesn’t mean we should have to play pretend or accommodate that illness. And if their actions, like what he’s doing here, imply activism then we should call it what it is and act accordingly.
I have no idea if he believes in Christ or not. He does appear to be mentally ill.
This is a common yet staggeringly stupid take on the industry. Yes, there are extremely unqualified “agents” that enter and exit the field on the regular but the vast majority of deals are handled by experts with clients greatly benefiting from their expertise. People and markets aren’t dumb. If the value wasn’t there, no one would utilize their services. Yet they do. I’m a broker and knees deep in some of the most complicated deals of my career. Without me, these wouldn’t even be possible. Having said that, people like yourself generally don’t understand the risks and perils that await you without professional representation, but it’s your choice. If someone chooses to hire an idiot model as their representative then that’s on them, not the industry.