Daftar 40+ homeless media yang diundang Kepala Bakom RI Qodari:
1. Folkative
2. Indozone
3. Dagelan
4. Indomusikgram
5. Infipop
6. Narasi
7. Muslimvlog
8. USS Feed
9. Bapak-Bapak ID
10. Menjadi Manusia
11. GNFI
12. Cretivox
13. Kok Bisa?
14. Taubaters
15. Pandemic Talks
16. Kawan Hawa
17. Folix
18. Ngomongin Uang
19. Big Alpha
20. Good States
21. Hai Dulu
22. Proud Project
23. Vibes
24. Unframed
25. Kumpul Leaders
26. CXO Media
27. Volix Media
28. How To Do Nothing
29. Everless Media
30. Geometry Media
31. Folks Diary
32. Dream
33. Melodi Alam
34. NKTSHI
35. Modestalk
36. Lead Media
37. Nalar TV
38. Mahasiswa dan Jakarta
39. North West
40. Mature Indonesia
Coming soon: the #IPAD Indonesian Prehistoric Archaeology Database. (open to the public). 2 years of research in archaeological semantic databases. I am open to collaborations within academic / research institutions in Indonesia. #prasejarah#arkeologi
Why isn't China intervening to stop the US war of aggression against Iran?
Somehow this is still a question people are asking, so I will explain.
1. China's military is built to defend China within and along its borders against a massive and growing US military build-up all along its peripheries ongoing for decades.
Its forces are organized around hardware designed specifically for this purpose - not to project military power around the globe like the US does - and the US has these capabilities because it is an aggressor - not for national defense.
China literally has no ability to project the military power required to confront and successfully stop a full-scale US war of aggression on the other side of the planet with the capabilities it has for national defense;
2. In order to launch this war on Iran - the US spent decades building up a network of global and regional bases, logistical networks, ammunition depots, fuel dumps, regional integrated air defense capabilities etc. to first encircle Iran - then attack it.
China would be required to create an equal or greater network throughout the region to stop this- and this simply isn't possible;
3. The US built its network up through both politically capturing nations in the region (Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Bahrain, UAE, Kuwait) and invading/occupying them (Iraq & Syria).
China simply doesn't conduct its foreign policy this way - because if it did - it would be just as bad as the US itself;
4. If you think China could simply project military power over the horizon - this is even more difficult and unrealistic. This requires huge amounts of long-range aircraft, immense aerial refueling capabilities, and long-range munitions as well as forward bases at least near the region to do so.
Sending naval vessels would simply place them at the mercy of a better prepared and more extensive military positions the US has established over decades as explained above;
5. What China has likely done is all that it could do - provide economic support against illegal US sanctions, provide technical/material support for Iran's military industrial production, provide military support through the transfer of weapons and equipment.
All of these have their limits especially in terms of the transfer of military equipment to Iran - which takes YEARS to train Iranian personnel on EFFECTIVELY, as well as to integrate it through training in modern combined arms operations.
This last point regarding the amount of time it takes to effectively integrate new military hardware into a military is exactly why Ukraine has failed to absorb and fully utilize floods of Western weapons and equipment in the US proxy war on Russia being waged there.
CONCLUSION
There are real-world limitations on what nations like Russia and China can do against US wars of aggression elsewhere especially considering the fact the US is waging proxy war on both Russia and China at the same time it wages direct war on Iran.
Russia and China are doing what is realistic and within their capabilities - and are constantly expanding their own capabilities in order to do more when possible.
Do not confuse real limitations with a lack of concern or will - and realize blaming Russia or China for a US WAR OF AGGRESSION simply serves Washington's agenda - not Iran's or any of its allies.
Bagi yang bingung kenapa intelektual2 Islam Liberal pasca-9/11 sekarang berubah jadi pembela tambang, bisa baca tulisan lama Windu Jusuf dan David Bourchier ini.
Argumennya: liberalisme Indonesia muncul buat melayani otoritarianisme negara.
https://t.co/A4fXLve01I
Kalian tau ga sih kalo ternyata padi (Oryza sativa) bisa balik jadi liar lagi. Fenomena ini disebut de-domestikasi, yaitu ketika tanaman hasil budidaya manusia perlahan kembali punya sifat-sifat leluhurnya di alam liar.
Kayak yang kita tau dalam sejarahnya, padi liar (Oryza rufipogon) yang merupakan nenek moyang padi, punya biji yang gampang rontok (seed shattering) supaya bisa menyebar dan tumbuh lagi secara alami. Nah, manusia zaman dulu menemukan varian yang nggak rontok karena mutasi ini dan mereka mulai membudidayakan itu. Dari situlah muncul padi modern yang kita makan sekarang.
Menariknya, sebagian padi modern ini malah berevolusi balik jadi seperti padi liar akibat mutasi genetik. Jadi bijinya rontok lagi, tumbuh acak di sawah, dan susah dikendalikan. Jenis padi ini disebut weedy rice, atau di Indonesia dikenal sebagai padi angin/padi hantu.
Evolution in action!
_________
DAFTAR PUSTAKA:
Qiu, J., et al. (2017). Genomic variation associated with local adaptation of weedy rice during de-domestication. Nature Communications, 8(1), 15323. https://t.co/4CuM3UW5ZY
Wu, D., Lao, S., & Fan, L. (2021). De-domestication: an extension of crop evolution. Trends in Plant Science, 26(6), 560-574. https://t.co/rxSVlgQB6p
kayaknya orang-orang yang gak berhadapan langsung sama pengorganisiran harus tau bahwa kontradiksi dan diskursus tuh sangat wajar; mau dalam internal organisasi atau dalam pergerakan itu sendiri. self criticism is important, we want movement that learns
Pernyataan Sikap Komite Politik Nasional - Partai Buruh.
Aksi 28-29 Agustus: Antara Kemarahan Rakyat, Manuver Elit, dan Keharusan Keterorganisiran Gerakan Rakyat.
Tuntutan konkret:
1. Pendalaman demokrasi
2. Redistribusi kekayaan
3. Perlindungan sosial melalui pelayanan publik