北极泊

虫鸣，烙饼以及手作。

[北极泊 @beijibo]

建议中国不要跟风将人工智能的英文翻译为SI，不吉利。AI 好。人工智能对人类没有爱，人类可能要遭殃。😂

[北极泊 @beijibo]

@yetone 好看

[北极泊 @beijibo]

我是不是可以理解为：OpenAI的伟大是通过GPT点火了AI，自此之后一直是一种致敬式的创新？

[北极泊 @beijibo]

@YGandelsman @grok 这篇文章讲了什么事

[北极泊 @beijibo]

快拉了。

[Tibo @thsottiaux]

Hi,

Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.

Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.

(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.

I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.

Codexingly,
Tibo

[北极泊 @beijibo]

我想知道，全球优秀的开发者在用GPT-6 Astra创造什么伟大作品

[北极泊 @beijibo]

OpenAI自从推出GPT5.3 Codex以来，没有那个模型让我对它印象特别，它是“一位”优秀的工程师。

后来的模型？感觉像是左脚踩右脚自动化模型训练模型的优秀答题者。

[北极泊 @beijibo]

@trotsky_nkist @grok 从《菊与刀》评价这个民族

[北极泊 @beijibo]

GPT 6 Astra 让人失望

极快的额度消耗和那些被吹捧的模型能力，实际表现总如此拉胯：意图聚焦和任务执行很像一个被誉为高智商的傻子——它对现实情境任务的胜任着实让人怀疑。

如果将OpenAI 看作是一家营销公司那我觉得一切的疑问都说的通了。

[北极泊 @beijibo]

阴谋论：OpenAI对模型进行了某种安全审查，这种审查会通过一种不公开的方式与模型任务通讯继而改变模型的任务执行策略。

[Zara Zhang @zarazhangrui]

Anyone else notices this problem with Astra?

Astra: I have done X
Me: This is wrong, you should do Y instead
Astra: You're right. I should do Y
Me: ...

Why doesn't it just go and do Y, like the other models??

[北极泊 @beijibo]

魔怔了

[SuSu_酥酥👅 @NFT_Chen]

😱又口出狂言了：Anthropic老板Dario Amodei自口承认对华鹰派，主张把中国AI当成苏联核导弹来谈“限速”！

🔸Dario公开自称对华持hawkish立场，把美中AI竞争直接类比冷战核对抗：当年双方各有上万枚导弹互指，现在也得谈，把毁灭规模压下来。

🔸称中国一旦在AI上领先，将对美国和世界构成严重危险；全球一起减速的最大障碍就是中国不跟，军事优势太大。

🔸主张先把美国领先窗口再拉大3到5年：先进芯片和半导体制造设备不能卖、走私要打、模型防偷。

🔸谈判可以谈，先禁危险用途、统一测安全、再给递归自我改进设上限；生物风险那句更刺——“即使中国人也不想要这个”。

🔸安全叙事包装下，落地全是封锁、限速、防超车。冷战核军控话术，直接套到2026年的AI上了。

请问川普总统、习近平主席能同意吗？！

#DarioAmodei #Anthropic #对华鹰派 #AI限速 #芯片禁令 #PaceTheFrontier​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

https://t.co/R6r6UOTmv4

[北极泊 @beijibo]

@jmbollenbacher 认可你的观点。我们有八千年文明的记忆和一些伟大祖先智慧的影响，深知“和合之道”有利于长远。赢是西方人的叙事，我们遵循这个游戏规则，但在从思想到历史到文化，“和合”是中国人的生存发展智慧沉淀，文明尊严写进执大器者的意识当中。任何有悖于这一智慧的行为最后都是以覆灭收场。有句话叫以史为鉴。

[北极泊 @beijibo]

@superalesha 观点一致

[北极泊 @beijibo]

继续致力开源，而非只听那些道貌岸然的家伙。

致敬那些正在为人类文明进步事业积极努力的人们。我想个体往往比组织更有魄力。

[北极泊 @beijibo]

GPT6 Astra是怎么了，高大上的宣传，平庸的表现——它显然不是一个面向编程任务的模型。

[北极泊 @beijibo]

有人说Astra发布后自哭了，有些说自己瘫了，我的直觉告诉我这并不真实。

[北极泊 @beijibo]

Fable 5.1 和 GPT-6 Astra真实对比到底如何？

今天显然没有Fable 5发布时的氛围

[北极泊 @beijibo]

Fable 5.1 和 GPT-6 Astra真实对比到底如何？

今天显然没有Fable 5发布时的氛围

[北极泊 @beijibo]

@BitcoinIntelX yes

[北极泊 @beijibo]

Codex多开子代理的UI图标像十年前的审美产物

[北极泊 @beijibo]

@OpenAI @grok 他们讲了些什么