Dowry is a choice made by your parents to pay in order to marry you.
It is a choice, not a forced choice, it is a voluntary choice. It’s your dad’s choice, it’s your choice. You choose to pay.
If your father wishes, and you wish, both of you could opt out of paying dowry. You could simply refuse someone who is asking for dowry and marry elsewhere, where no one is demanding it.
Before blaming anyone else for dowry, question your father and yourself: why did you decide to marry into a family that was asking for dowry, and why did you pay it in the first place when you had the option to simply opt out and marry to someone who is not demanding dowry.
That's what the point is. Why does the women's family give dowry if the men's family demands it. Where is rejection in this process? Why not wait for a guy who doesn't demand dowry?
Men blame the bride’s dad for giving dowry to get a rich groom. In reality, the groom’s family demands it. Today, many women earn way more than men also come from strong family backgrounds.
Traditionally, men were providers but women stepped out to work for self respect due to mistreatment. (1/2)
#Financial independence solves practical needs, but marriage fulfills emotional, social, and family aspirations that money alone can’t. We need the 2nd thing that why we don't want to have a life without feminine energy. But when one wants a self-centred life, no need to marry.
Biased view.
What if she has not sacrificed anything. Not career. Not her family, Not her ex relationships, not her health. She still gets alimony.
But dowry, no irrelevant men get dowry. They marry without dowry. It is only given to influential families by the women's families.
Dowry is like saying, “Pay me to marry your daughter.”
Alimony is support after divorce if one partner is economically dependent or has sacrificed career, income, or time for the relationship/family.
Dowry = illegal demand.
Alimony = legal right.
A fair statement is:
I won’t take dowry, and I believe alimony should only be given when truly needed.
That's why financial independence is needed. You don't need your spouse's money or father's shelter to rely on. You can step out when limits are crossed and sustain yourself. And yes many brave men and women as well do that nowadays ...
These guys have three cases to mention everywhere. Atul Subhash, Blue Drum, Meghalaya horror. That's it. Meanwhile women suffer everyday. And then they turn blind.
If that was the scenario, everything was good. But most of the parents and wives start a new fight with alimony and other allegations. Which leads to these kinds of violent actions from the other end. If everything is about peace, just leave and get divorced and live your life.
Bc kya maut aati hai apni betiyon ko bas itna bolne mein ke mere bachhe sasuraal mein kuch sahi na lage to ghar wapas aa jaiyo, ye ghar tera hai aur tera hi rahega!
A man was spending time with his son.
His wife saw him on the road, recorded a video, and publicly humiliated him.
She said that she was working and he was not.
She also said - I should've married a rich man.
What happened to equality? Are men just ATMs?
CJI Suryakant Sharma is completely impartial and never judges by caste.
DSP Puja Pandey in Seoni, MP, seized ₹2.96 crore in Oct 2025 but showed only ₹1.45 crore and allegedly pocketed ₹1.5 crore.
Court granted her bail today because she is a mother of a small child.
Meanwhile, 1,537 women (85% undertrials) with young children are suffering in Indian jails.
Hope this "impartial" judgment applies to all such mothers.
Parents need to be more cautious. Instead of marrying in a dowry demanding family. They should choose a good simple family. Parents are more at fault. When she was suffering this. They should have taken some step.
In the blue drum case, the woman was of the lowest grade. The man was not at fault. What do you want? Just think before you say anything. You are just glorifying a crime for your pleasure.
Kitne gawar log hai baat dowry death ki ho rhi alimony alimony kr rhe hai bewkufo ki trh. One is actual crime and other if misused in wrong way then it's a crime.
गृहमंत्री अमितशाह छतीसगढ़ पहुंचे है, इनके काफिले में कितनी गाड़ियां है आप ख़ुद गिन लीजिए
दो दिन पहले दो गाड़ियों के साथ रील बनाकर जनता को बेवक़ूफ़ बनाया जा रहा था 🤣
First let the investigation happen and the court decides who the culprit is. Don't be so impatient to blame the patriarchy. Same patriarchy has made you educated enough to say all this.
Have received 5 calls in the last 2 hours from media channels asking me to join for a debate on #TwishaSharma case
DID NOT RECEIVE EVEN 1 CALL FROM ANY OF THESE CHANNELS WHEN JUDGE AMAN KUMAR SHARMA KILLED HIMSELF
EQUALITY 🤡
🚨 HUSBAND : I want to withdraw my divorce petition.
WIFE : He is withdrawing divorce because he doesn’t have money to pay alimony. At least litigation costs may be allowed.
HUSBAND : No, please no litigation cost.
SUPREME COURT : You filed a petition, she came here, engaged a lawyer, you have to pay litigation cost.
WIFE : He is a Govt teacher.
HUSBAND : My salary is 52K
SC : Are you giving any maintenance to her?
HUSBAND : 15K a month.
SC to WIFE : If he is not in a position to pay lump sum amount then keep taking maintenance. File for enhancement (of maintenance).
SC : Ok litigation expenses….
HUSBAND : Not more than 5-10k please
SC : Supreme Court mein 5-10k? Kya baat kar rahe ho? Is this Tehsildaar Court?
SC : 52K salary
SC : You will have to pay Rs 1 lakh
HUSBAND : 1 lakh not possible Millord
SC : Okay 55K bas.
HUSBAND : 20K please
SC : 55K. To be paid within 4 weeks.
No outrage for Aman Sharma's suicide. No arrests.
Even though he said he was tortured by his wife and her sister.
While lots of outrage on Tvisha Sharma case. 10K reward and no interim bail announced.
It shows that women get justice in this country, but men don't.
Divorced for adultery + cruelty…
But still ordered to pay ₹60,000/month maintenance + ₹25 Lacs compensation 😂
Indian courts in 2026: “She deserves the lifestyle of her ex-husband living in UAE”
Even after the husband won divorce on grounds of her cheating.
Harassment level = MAXIMUM 🔥
When justice is blind… and heavily biased.