omotola🌹

God first 🙏🙏 Good vibes✌✌ Big goals💪💪 👸| SKINCARE

[Ebele @SirEbele]

Jonah 2:8 They that observe LYING VANITIES forsake their own MERCY.

Don't allow anyone teach you grace in a way that makes you forsake God's mercy.

This is what those who teach against repentance do.

Grace and mercy are two aspects of the goodness (good news) of God in Christ. One does not exist without the other.

Grace is receiving from God what you could never have earned or deserved.

Mercy is not receiving from God that judgment or punishment you fully deserve.

While grace evokes faith in the heart; mercy evokes repentance.

Anyone who teaches or preaches the good news of God always produces these two things in the heart of the believer

Faith, and Repentance.

[Faithfulness Okom @AttorneyF_]

A man walks into a waiting hall with a woman. They both appear to be around the same age. Both wear matching gold rings on their left ring fingers. They enter holding hands, a toddler between them. He kisses her and leaves.

If Someone says they are married and you respond, “I didn’t literally hear him say she is my wife,” you are not being rigorous. You are being dishonest.

Suppose later the same day you see the same couple at a restaurant celebrating with friends and you ask one of the waiters “hey what are they celebrating over there” and the waiter says the couple in matching outfits is celebrating their second wedding anniversary. If you walk out still unconvinced because the man never explicitly said “she is my wife,” you are a fool.

This is the exact level of critical thinking behind this argument about Jesus not saying “I am God”. That it has survived this long is a massive indictment on the intellectual standards of everyone who repeats it. If I were Muslim, I would plead with Imams to retire it before it does further damage to the faith's credibility.

We live in a world governed by circumstantial evidence. The justice system convicts people who never admit guilt, on the basis of facts alone. A court doesn't need a killer to say “I did it.” It examines interlocking data points: DNA, cell tower pings, footage, motive, and timelines.

One piece of evidence can be contested. When fifty lock together, they form an inescapable net. To deny the conclusion because you lack a literal confession is a deliberate suspension of common sense.

And the irony cuts deep cos you guys are quick to claim Jesus was Muslim, when you don’t have a single verse where he says “I am Muslim.” The selective bias is shamefully demonic.

If we take the framework I’ve laid down into first-century Judea and look at the interlocking facts:

Jesus used the absolute "I Am" (Ego eimi), the exact phrasing Jews recognized as the divine name given to Moses at the burning bush. When he spoke it, they picked up stones. You do not stone a man for claiming to be a good teacher.

He stood before the Sanhedrin and told the high priest they would see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power, coming on the clouds of heaven, drawing from Daniel 7, where the Son of Man receives everlasting dominion. The high priest tore his garments, the prescribed response to blasphemy.

He called himself Lord of the Sabbath, an institution YHWH established at creation. To claim lordship over it is to claim the authority of its author.

He forgave sins. Directly: “Your sins are forgiven.” The scribes responded: “Who can forgive sins but God alone?” They were theologically correct. He did not correct them.

These were men formed in the architecture of Jewish theology. They understood divine prerogative. Their repeated response was execution. You do not execute a man for blasphemy because he is a moral teacher. You execute him because he claimed what their tradition reserves for God alone.

The verdict does not require your agreement. It required theirs. And they gave it.

To look at all that evidence and say “he never claimed to be God” means you already made up your mind before reading. But at least be honest about it and retire the kindergarten logic.

[EasyDesigner @iamkadirii]

I will say this again, it is better for you to sell
Thrifts on TikTok than enter a bank as a contract staff in 2026.

[The Frontliner 🇬🇧 @iamSwaga22]

Everywhere they are , same story

[Joseph Brendan @Joe_brendan_]

You know the wild thing about the banditry and killings in Northern Nigeria?

ITS HEAVILY UNDER-REPORTED

[Pathfinder @Pathfinder077]

Clearly reminder that Deborah wasn’t carried to court before those Islamic fanatics carried out jungle justice on her.

“Shariah law is only for Muslims and not for non Muslims” 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

BREAKING: Dozens of Christians were massacred in Ethiopia over the course of the last week by Islamists.

Tens of thousands of Christians have been slaughtered by Islamists across Africa, and the world doesn’t seem to care.

[Faithfulness Okom @AttorneyF_]

Again I ask, what exactly is Islam? Is it the principle of submission in the abstract? Is it the Quran as it reflects that principle? Or is it Muhammad as he embodies it? Because whichever answer you land on, “perfect” is the last word that survives contact with the evidence.

Your tweet is a classic rhetorical escape hatch. Abstract a religion high enough and it floats above all criticism. But faith cannot survive as a vacuum, it lives in its exemplar. Christianity presents Jesus as the flawless embodiment of its own theology, a figure whose moral perfection holds without needing to be retrofitted by the standards of any century. Even in Islamic theology, Jesus is recognized as sinless. So a Christian can say Christian’s aren’t perfect but Christ is.

Muhammad stands at the peak of the Islamic hill as the ‘Uswa Hasana’, the eternal, timeless pattern of conduct for all mankind. If Islam is perfect, its timeless exemplar must be perfect. But the moment his actions are held to a timeless standard, the defense collapses into historical relativism.

To defend his life as perfect, you must argue that child marriage, the consummation of a marriage with a nine-year-old, the execution of captives, and the immediate sexual consumption of women taken in raids were all merely the norms of 7th-century Arabia. Fine. But then you have surrendered the entire argument. If an action requires the moral context of the 7th century to be excused, it cannot by definition be the timeless moral standard for the 21st. You cannot have both.

Sahih Bukhari records that Muhammad was severely affected by magic for months, to the point of imagining he had done things he had not done. If the seal of all prophecy can have his cognitive reality overwritten by a spell, divine protection means something far thinner than you have been told.

Then what I find most interesting is the question of how he died. Surah Al-Haqqah (69:44-46) is explicit: if the Prophet were to fabricate revelations, Allah would seize him and cut his aorta. It is offered as the divine guarantee of his authenticity. Yet Sahih Bukhari records Muhammad on his deathbed still feeling the lingering effects of the poison he consumed at Khaybar, concluding: “this is the time when it seems that my aorta is being cut by that poison.”

Your own scripture says the test of a false prophet is that Allah will cut his aorta. Your own tradition records that your prophet died believing his aorta was being cut. That is a serious theological problem. And abstracting “Islam” into some frictionless idea above all this does not solve it.

[Samuel Mamudu ⛲ @samjunyarts]

TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS

[HRM Oba Omotooyosi Bayo M.Akinleye @KabiesiOlukosi]

Don’t let them change the narrative.

Oyo kidnappers are not political actors, they are RELIGIOUS actors.

They demanded for Religion laws, not political party law.

Retweet to expose the truth.

[Faithfulness Okom @AttorneyF_]

I’ve heard so many people insist there has to be more than one way to God, as though a single path is inherently unfair and multiple options are self-evidently just.

But this argument almost never engages the actual question. It skips straight to fairness and never asks: fair given what? Fair given which diagnosis?

Jesus Christ is not a preference. He is a prescription. And prescriptions are exclusive because diseases are specific.

The Christian claim is not that God is stingy with salvation. It is that sin carries a documented consequence which is death and separation from God, and that consequence requires a specific solution. You cannot treat a debt by being a better person going forward. The debt still exists. You cannot treat it by praying in a certain direction or performing symbolic acts. Those things do not touch the penalty but only demonstrate that you have underestimated it.

So when someone says there must be another way, they are making one of two arguments without realising it: either sin is not serious enough to require the cross, or God was too dramatic when he said the consequence was death. Both positions require you to call God a liar. That is your right. But it is not a generous theology, it is a pretentious contradiction.

And perhaps more importantly, the message of Christ is not only about eternity. Accepting the resurrection means accepting your nature. It means living with the knowledge that every time you sin, you are crucifying him again. That image does not automatically stop sin, but it creates friction. It creates gravity, and it makes repentance something you pursue, not something you schedule.

A judge cannot pardon an offense the defendant refuses to acknowledge. But the deeper problem is not even guilt, it is jurisdiction. When you reject Christ, you are not simply saying “I am innocent.” You are saying “this court has no authority over me.” You are contesting God’s right to declare the consequence in the first place.

But God has already entered the record. 1 John 1 says you have sinned. Romans 6 says the wage of that sin is death. These are not opinions. They are the charges, filed and documented. Every other religious path; Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, however sincere and however demanding, hands you a program for self-improvement. They say: do this, abstain from that, accumulate enough, and you can close the gap yourself. They make you the solution to your own problem. Christianity alone says the gap cannot be closed from your side, and then points to the only one who closed it from his.

So the question “why can’t there be many ways to God?” is really the question “why can’t I negotiate the terms of my own pardon?” And the answer is that you are not the judge. You did not set the penalty. You do not get to revise it because you find it inconvenient. The court is already in session, and the evidence is already submitted. The only remaining question is whether you will accept what has already been done on your behalf, or insist that a crime you committed in a court you refuse to recognise deserves a sentence you are willing to serve.

Grace is not the absence of consequence. It is consequence fully met, by someone else, on your behalf. Rejecting that is the most expensive pride a person can carry.

[Faithfulness Okom @AttorneyF_]

The idea of Sharia regulating lust is frankly stupid. God desires your purity because you love Him, not because you are trapped in a system of darkness and intimidation.

If the Almighty wanted forced compliance, He would have enacted it Himself, He never would have granted Adam and Eve the free agency to reach for the fruit in the Garden.

The assumption that the Creator of the universe requires religious rascals and terrorists to bully humanity into fearing Him is profoundly pathetic. Anyone who refrains from lust under the threat of Sharia hasn’t experienced a transformation of the heart; they are just cowering before tyrants.

Your obsession with a draconian system that stones apostates, murders 'blasphemers,' and amputates limbs is backward and prehistoric.

Keep your Sharia in your own countries and stop masquerading your obsession with control as divine piety. God does not need your violent assistance to oppress people into submission; you are not stronger than Him. What He actually demands is for people to boldly proclaim the GOOD NEWS of His love for mankind, while fiercely respecting the very choices He gave them.

[RCCG PUBLIC RELATIONS @RCCG_PR]

The lies have gone on long enough. It stops now!!!

For far too long, Pastor E.A. Adeboye and The Redeemed Christian Church of God have been subjected to false narratives, deliberate misrepresentations, and misleading commentaries driven by personal interests and agenda setting.

[omotola🌹 @bejuex]

Foolishness of men💯

[Dunsin Oyekan of #Geni @DunsinOyekan]

All other gods they are the.....

[leelee 🇵🇹 @liliisntit]

“i built lagos” don destroy lagos and the other 35 states wey he no build. 💔

[OREOFE @Oreofe_06]

SHE WAS KIDNAPPED SINCE 14 YEARS AGO,
SHE WAS 14 YEARS THEN, NOW SHE HAS TURN 26 YEARS OLD.. STILL HELD CAPTIVE 💔😭😢😢😢💔💔😭😭😭😭

LEAH SHARIBU.. a Christian girl that was born in Nigeria.

Leah Sharibu was abducted by Boko Haram an 1slamic Mu$lim movement ,twelve years ago. at the age of 14😢😢😢

She was among the 110 secondary school girls who were kidn@pped on February 19, 2014 in Yobe state by Boko Haram.

While her fellow captives were released, she was held back because she refused to convert from Christianity to Islam.

She was allegedly married off to one Boko Haram member. She had a child for him and they divorced.

She was married to one ISWAP commander. She had a child for him and She was also married to another Boko Haram member. She also had a child for him too 😭😭😭😢😢💔

Leah Sharibu has three kids for three men. She is still in captivity. Her life has been sh@ttered forever. Even if she is rescued, the old Leah is gone for good.😭😭😭

Nigeria failed her.😢😢😢💔💔😔

Leah Sharibu turns 26 this May 2026

As you are enjoying with your own daughters

Remember that someone's daughter is under detention for years and was f@rcefully married off to different men .😢😔

Please use 1 minute to pray for LEAHSHARIBU, pray for her freedom.😢😭😭😭💔💔💔🙏🏽🙏🏽
C: Amos

[Samuel @SamuelIse3]

It won't cost you zero Naira, please retweet massively.💔💔

[Dunsin Oyekan of #Geni @DunsinOyekan]

6pm(wat) on YouTube this evening, join me for the premiere of ONLY YOU

There’s no need searching, No one like our GOD!

Kindly spread the news and see you there!

[Shahriq Khan @RealShahriqKhan]

When I was Muslim, I used to ask Christians:

“If Jesus was really God, why did He eat, sleep, and bleed like us?”

And honestly, I used to ask it with pride like it was some unbeatable argument.

But later I realized something:

That question was not exposing Christianity.

It was exposing my misunderstanding of what kind of God Jesus claimed to be.

Because the real question is not:

“Why would God become weak?”

The real question is:

“What kind of God would willingly step into human suffering at all?”

Islam taught me about a God who was distant and untouchable.

But Christianity introduced me to a God who stepped into hunger, exhaustion, grief, pain, betrayal, blood, and suffering with us.

And suddenly His humanity stopped feeling like weakness to me.

It became proof of love.

If Jesus ate, it means He came close enough to experience hunger beside us.

If He slept, it means He embraced the exhaustion we carry.

If He bled, it means He did not stand above suffering watching us from a distance.

He entered it Himself.

Philippians 2 says Christ emptied Himself and took on flesh.

Not because He stopped being God, but because He wanted humanity to finally see what God is actually like.

And it turns out God is willing to suffer for the people He loves.

That changed everything for me.

Because every other religion demanded sacrifice from humanity.

Jesus became the sacrifice Himself.

And no prophet in history ever claimed that.