If they wanted it to look believable they could have at least used the relevant ministry’s name and letterhead, as these things are usually launched by ministries and not party in government. Kana le gale ba itse gore re motlhofo go dumela sengwe le sengwe? 🤦🏾♂️
A man would do anything for the woman he truly likes, even the things other Woman say he isn't capable of doing , he’ll do it with joy and genuine happiness.
More details on the Gudaf Tsegay case:
Tsegay was prescribed Letrozole to treat a diagnosed medical condition and provided supporting medical evidence after being notified of the positive test in January 2026.
She later submitted a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) application, and the World Athletics Therapeutic Use Exemption Committee confirmed that her treatment met the requirements for a TUE. However, an application for a retroactive TUE was ultimately rejected by WADA.
Tsegay subsequently entered into a Case Resolution Agreement with the AIU and WADA, admitting anti-doping rule violations for the presence and use of a prohibited substance.
The 4-month sanction was deemed appropriate due to her prompt admission, the absence of significant fault or negligence, and the finding that she would have been granted a TUE had it been requested in advance.
🚨🎙️Ian Wright blast Uefa and gives credit to FIFA for not falling for the hype about Daniel Siebert’s performance in the Champions League Final tells you everything:
FIFA deserve credit for not falling for the hype.
UEFA are out here talking about Daniel Siebert’s performance like they just witnessed Pierluigi Collina in his prime. One of the greatest Champions League Final refereeing displays EVER? Seriously? That’s the standard now?
They’re ‘extremely pleased’? Pleased with what? The way the game flowed? The way he handled Arsenal vs PSG in that final? The big calls that kept going one way? The big calls? The protection? Come on, stop it! This is proper barrel-scraping from UEFA. It’s peak nepotism, peak protection of their own. Absolute nonsense.
This is exactly what’s wrong with modern football. Every institution wants to protect its own decisions. Nobody wants to admit that maybe, just maybe, the performance wasn’t this untouchable masterpiece they’re trying to sell to us.
And here’s the funniest part: FIFA looked at all the praise, all the back-patting, all the headlines, and still said, ‘No World Cup.’
That should tell you everything.
People are acting shocked, but FIFA’s job isn’t to hand out participation trophies because UEFA are happy. The World Cup is supposed to be the highest standard in football. If there is even significant debate surrounding a referee after the biggest club game of the season, why would FIFA reward that?
Some fans don’t want to hear it, especially the ones celebrating every decision that went their way, but football isn’t judged by emotion. It’s judged by credibility.
UEFA can release all the internal praise they want. If you have to keep telling people how historic a refereeing performance was, maybe it wasn’t as historic as you think.
The reality is simple: FIFA saw the noise, saw the controversy, saw the reaction from football fans around the world and made a decision.
And judging by how defensive some people have become, I’d say FIFA hit a nerve.
The World Cup isn’t won in UEFA boardrooms. It’s earned on the pitch.
That’s why FIFA’s decision carries more weight than a hundred UEFA compliments.”
The Bank of Scotland has unveiled a limited edition £20 note featuring an image inspired by Scott McTominay’s famous overhead kick
https://t.co/dLMwJkffeM
Ferrari every season without fail starts well until upgrades are brought in 😭🙆🏾♂️ other teams will improve while they regress or remain stagnant 😅 ahhh mxm