بنت المستكفي

עם ישראל חי

[Sabiha 🇺🇸 @Sabiha1278]

That's just the truth.

[j wall ✡ @jwhaifa]

❤️❤️🇧🇷✡️❤️

[Isaac @isaacrrr7]

¿Alguna vez has notado cómo la gente más violenta, loca y desagradable apoya a Palestina, mientras que la gente tranquila, inteligente y decente apoya a Israel?

[Daniel Mayakovski @DaniMayakovski]

Vean la idiocracia de EEUU, el bufón de Trump convirtió la Casa Blanca en un circo en tiempo récord, de las batallas de gladiadores ahora ha pasado a los espectáculos de variedades con motos.

"La sociedad del espectáculo no es un sueño que hay que realizar, sino una pesadilla de la que hay que despertar." Guy Debord (1967)

[Luai Ahmed @JustLuai]

In honor of Pride month, here’s a list of countries in the Middle East that recognize same sex marriage:

1. Israel

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

An Algerian Muslim was asked in a local TV interview: “What would you do if you saw prophet Muhammad?”

She started to cry and could not answer.

A Muslim man from the U.S. sought her out and married her to bring her to America.

A few months after arriving in the U.S., she divorced him and took off all her Islamic clothing to live freely.

[Jenni @hashjenni]

Until my final breath I will never understand how January 6th wasn't an instant dealbreaker for every single American voter

[Am Yisrael Chai 🐙 @AmYisraelChai_X]

Steve Perry’s his last name was originally Pereira, a Portuguese surname with roots in Sephardic Jewish history. The family converted to Catholicism during the Spanish Inquisition to escape persecution before changing it to Perry upon arriving in the U.S. 

[Acción y Comunicación sobre Oriente Medio - ACOM @ACOM_es]

Un musulmán que vive en Israel desmiente las mentiras sobre Israel: "Soy un sionista musulmán. Lo que ves en la televisión es diferente de la realidad. Israel es un buen país, y tenemos los mismos derechos que los judíos. Ven y visita Israel para ver la verdad."
Comparte esto. Los medios de comunicación convencionales no lo harán.

[SissiEmperatriz 🇮🇱 @GabyLob]

La otra frontera de Gaza:

Medios árabes publicaron imágenes que muestran que Egipto ha construido varias hileras de vallas para mantener a los gazatíes fuera de su territorio.

[Shiri_Sabra @sabra_the]

In April 1948, the Arab leadership of Haifa announced they wanted to evacuate the city.
Not that they were being forced out. Not that they had no choice. They announced it as a decision.

The Jewish mayor broke down in tears and begged them not to go. The British commander told them they were making a serious mistake. The Haganah’s chief officer promised full equality and peace to every Arab who stayed. The answer from the Arab Higher Committee in Beirut was evacuation anyway.

This is one of the most documented moments of 1948. It is also one of the least told.
Before any major military offensive in Haifa, between 25,000 and 30,000 Arabs had already left voluntarily. The fighting hadn’t reached most of their neighborhoods. What had happened was simpler and more damaging: the leadership had left first. British High Commissioner Sir Alan Cunningham documented it in an April 26 telegram, describing the abandonment by Arab municipal officials, military leaders, and the chief Arab magistrate as probably the greatest factor in the collapse of Arab morale in the city. When the people who are supposed to lead a community disappear, the community follows.
On April 22, a meeting was held at city hall to discuss a truce. The terms guaranteed full safety and civil rights to any Arab who stayed. Shabtai Levy, the Jewish mayor, broke down and pleaded personally with the Arab delegates, calling evacuation a cruel crime against their own people. The British commander urged them to reconsider. The Haganah promised equality and peace to anyone who remained.

The Arab Higher Committee in Beirut said go.
What Arab leaders said publicly in the months that followed tells the rest of the story.
The Economist reported in October 1948 that the departure was driven primarily by orders from the Higher Arab Executive, and that Arabs who stayed and accepted Jewish protection were being called renegades by their own leadership. Time magazine reported in May 1948 that the evacuation was partly driven by Arab leaders who hoped withdrawing Arab workers would paralyze the city economically. Emile Ghoury, secretary of the Palestinian Arab Higher Committee, told the Beirut Telegraph in September 1948 that the Arab states had agreed unanimously on the policy that created the refugees and must share in solving the problem. The Jordanian newspaper Falastin wrote in February 1949 that Arab states had encouraged Palestinians to leave temporarily to clear the way for the Arab invasion armies and then failed to help them return. Monsignor George Hakim, the Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, told the New York Herald Tribune in June 1949 that the Arabs of Haifa had fled despite the fact that Jewish authorities had guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens.
These aren’t Israeli sources. These are Arab leaders and Arab newspapers, in their own words, from 1948 & 1949.

The word Nakba was coined in August 1948 by a Syrian historian named Constantin Zureiq, a professor at the American University of Beirut. He used it to describe the catastrophic failure of seven Arab armies to defeat the newly declared State of Israel. In his own words, he wrote that seven Arab states declared war on Zionism in Palestine, stopped impotent before it, and then turned on their heels. He described Arab leaders whose declarations fell like bombs from their mouths but whose bombs were hollow and empty, causing no damage and killing no one. Zureiq made no mention of Palestinians as victims. He defined the Nakba as a self-inflicted Arab disaster, a failure of Arab leadership, Arab unity & Arab will.

That is what the word originally meant. A Syrian intellectual criticizing Arab governments for launching a war they were unprepared to win.
Somewhere between 1948 and the 1980s, that meaning was inverted entirely. The word that began as Arab self-criticism became the centerpiece of a narrative in which Arabs were passive victims & Israel was the aggressor

Edite. via: Melissa Steinberg Brodsky

[Doron @plexaleOK]

De un poema a un himno nacional.
De un sueño a un país.

Hatikva es la historia de una esperanza que se volvió identidad. Una canción que sigue uniendo

Esta es su historia

[بنت المستكفي @belimora]

https://t.co/BTImfCa8AA

[Street Smart @StreetSmart_x]

I’m An Arab Muslim Who Supports Israel!

[Rawan Osman روان عثمان @RawaneOsmane]

How can you possibly support Israel?

Westerners who adopt the Palestinian cause from a place of distance and comfort struggle to understand people like me; people who come from the Arab world and have walked away from it. Some of us didn’t just walk away. We chose a side.

I am the daughter of a Lebanese mother and a Syrian father.

My mother is a child of the Lebanese Civil War—a war in which militias, backed and fueled in the name of the Palestinian cause, tore Lebanon apart. Lebanese killed Lebanese. A country was destroyed, not to save Lebanon, but to serve a broader ideological project.

My father is Syrian. I grew up watching what regimes and militias did in Syria and Lebanon while constantly hearing that all of it was Israel’s fault.

That was the story.

But it didn’t match reality.

We lived humiliation, corruption, fear. We stood for hours at checkpoints, bribed officials for basic rights, feared prisons where people disappeared. We watched regimes claim to fight for Palestine while crushing their own people without mercy.

And still, we were told to sacrifice more. For Palestine.

At our expense.

So yes, let me be clear:

Do I stand with Israel against those who destroyed our countries in the name of that cause?

Any day. Anytime.

Because I have seen what they did to us.

And when I went to Israel, I saw something I was never supposed to see: a functioning country—a society with rights, accountability, and dignity—something my own region denied us.

That doesn’t mean Israel is perfect.

It means the story I was told was incomplete—and dangerously so.

So when you ask, “How can you possibly support Israel?”

Understand this:

Some of us are not speaking from ideology.

We are speaking from experience. And no, we were not paid or manipulated. We changed our minds when we finally saw the full picture.

#Israël #lebanon #israel #FreeIranNow

[Portal Direita Israel @portaldireitais]

O antissemitismo não aparece do nada. Ele nasce em pessoas que levam uma vida de frustração, seja dentro da família, no trabalho ou nos relacionamentos. Quando alguém se sente constantemente insatisfeito, mas não consegue admitir ou entender a própria responsabilidade nisso, surge uma tendência perigosa: culpar os outros pelos próprios fracassos.

Esse é o primeiro passo para o ódio irracional. Em vez de olhar para dentro e se questionar: “o que posso fazer para mudar minha situação?”, a pessoa busca um inimigo externo. É mais fácil apontar o dedo do que enfrentar a dor e a mediocridade pessoal.

Esse comportamento é explicado pelo mecanismo de projeção: a pessoa transfere para os outros aquilo que não consegue aceitar em si mesma. O ódio, portanto, não vem de uma causa real, mas de um desequilíbrio interno. Por isso o antissemitismo revela falta de respeito próprio, ausência de princípios e de valores morais sólidos. Quem não aprendeu a se respeitar nunca saberá respeitar o outro.

Além disso, quem vive nessa cegueira emocional se torna facilmente manipulável. Políticos e líderes religiosos sabem disso e exploram o ressentimento das massas. Transformam a raiva pessoal em discurso coletivo, fornecendo uma “causa” ilusória a quem nunca entendeu as raízes do próprio sofrimento.

O antissemita é um instrumento de manipulação, apenas uma peça num jogo maior. Por isso que tentar “convencer” um antissemita com argumentos lógicos é inútil, não perca seu tempo. O problema não é informação, mas de saúde mental e emocional. O que essa pessoa precisa não é de debate, mas de ajuda psiquiátrica. É só quando o indivíduo encara a própria dor e entende suas limitações que ele deixa de precisar de um inimigo para justificar a própria existência.

Não fique quieto, vão nos odiar de qualquer jeito.

🎗️

[Hillel Fuld @HilzFuld]

Don’t let the facts confuse your propaganda!

[Tami 🇮🇱 @roitele1]

EL TAMAÑO DE LA MULTITUD NO REPRESENTA NI GARANTIZA LA RAZÓN.

[Isaac @isaacrrr7]

🚨🔥 UN ÁRABE DE KUWAIT DESTRUYE EL DISCURSO PALESTINO DE LA ONU EN LA ONU‼️

Jasem Aljuraid, periodista kuwaití:

“Señor Presidente,

He oído el término «colonizadores». Pero, ¿quiénes son los verdaderos colonizadores? Un reino judío gobernó Judea durante mil años. Nosotros, los árabes, nos apoderamos de esta tierra.

¿Quién arabizó a los egipcios, fenicios, persas y amazighs? Fuimos nosotros, los árabes.

¿Por qué, entonces, el consejo consagra una mentira al mantener un punto permanente en la agenda sobre Palestina, mientras ignora el regreso a casa del corazón indígena de Israel?

Seamos claros sobre quién defiende realmente nuestra soberanía. Hoy, Israel lucha por la paz, liberando a Gaza de los terroristas de Hamás y protegiendo a los iraníes de la República Islámica.

Lo que Israel está haciendo con la Guardia Revolucionaria Islámica —impidiendo que un régimen genocida adquiera armas nucleares— es un regalo para la humanidad.

Existen 57 países islámicos y un único estado judío, Israel. A pesar del odio constante que se busca eliminarlo, Israel no solo ha sobrevivido, sino que ha prosperado.
No creo en los milagros, pero este es uno de ellos.

Así que le pregunto a la ONU: ¿cuándo pondrán fin al ritual de condenar a Israel?

¿No es hora, en cambio, de aprender de Israel? De cómo derrotar al terrorismo, defender las sociedades libres y buscar la paz.

Gracias."