@c3K@ryancbriggs@DrEmmaZang@AdamBerinsky this was poorly stated - what I mean is that this information is NOT required to be "included in the text or footnotes of the manuscript and in the Author Questionnaire at submission"
@ryancbriggs@DrEmmaZang@AdamBerinsky I also believe this is more stringent than what is required for statistical software usage (eg R/stata version numbers, package versions and date of use). Not that it's a bad idea in isolation, but it is a step change in record-keeping requirements that imposes new burdens
@Apoorva__Lal Another fun set of historical material - Rob Tibshirani hosting short interviews with Rubin, Vovk, Robins, etc as part of a reading course he's leading https://t.co/rpkD8ZCBPl
@Chris_T_Kenny@matt_blackwell This looks really nice - the one thing to consider adding is how to use the command line effectively, like how Dirk Eddelbuettel structures his https://t.co/xJ7RjqLmzJ
❓Do perceptions of migrants’ politics affect their reception? @ProfTortuga, @MigrationNerd & @yangyang_zhou leverage a case in which migrants come from a similar language and religious background to isolate the role of political perceptions. @The_JOP⬇️ https://t.co/C7FyqgDpOe
.@Chris_T_Kenny is an #Americanist and #methodologist, studying democratic institutions using computational methods with a focus on redistricting and the census. His job market paper studies how rules impact the actions of courts and policymakers.
https://t.co/JEw9bu7RIY
@JohnGBullock@seanjtaylor@StefanWager chapters on policy learning, adaptive experiments, HTE estimation, balancing weights, deep treatment on spillovers etc all stand out as new in having full book chapter treatment
@JohnGBullock@seanjtaylor@StefanWager this looks pretty differentiated from e.g. mostly harmless and its descendents like mixtape (econometrics heavy), imbens/rubin (potential outcomes upfront, no ml + CI, little longitudinal CI) or hernan/robins (biostats, DAGs, longitudinal obs ci).