“And what I think is important to know is a lot of the increase in rape also comes from an expanded definition of what counts as rape, as well as survivors coming forward for acts that took place years prior,” Mamdani said. “And we are thankful for them coming forward, the courage and the bravery it takes, but just to provide New Yorkers with that context.”
In 2024 New York instituted a new law that, per the NYPost, "classifies rape as nonconsensual or forcibly compelled sexual intercourse, oral sexual conduct or anal sexual conduct after previously defining rape as only nonconsensual or forcibly compelled vaginal penetration by a penis."
So... New York (rightly!) expanded the definition of what counts as rape. More survivors (thankfully!) came forward. As a result, official rates of rape increased. So Mamdani was... right and everyone is just yelling about this in bad faith?
Anti-woke people are truly the weakest people alive.
Wait until I tell them there's a loved adaptation of Hercules where Hades talks like a scummy lawyer, Zeus is good, and the story is told by black gospel singers, one of whom is thicc and gets some of the best lines.
Conclusion :
1) Mélenchon avait raison.
2) Attal a tort.
3) @priscathevenot a menti en disant que Mélenchon avait menti.
Bref, les macronistes font du macronisme... 🤡🤡🤡
“Climate change will manifest as a series of disasters viewed through phones with footage that gets closer and closer to where you live until you’re the one filming it”❤️🩹
🚨‼️ 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗟 𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥𝗧: Sudan’s head coach said he voted for Mohamed Salah in the 2019 FIFA The Best award.
When FIFA published the official results, his vote was recorded as going to Lionel Messi. 😳
The Sudan FA requested an investigation, but no public explanation has ever been issued.
Uma vez durante uma aula eu estava distraída vistando atividades e um aluno do mais absoluto nada falou "olha prof, 11 de setembro" quando virei ele estava com um aviãozinho de papel e arremessou entre dois alunos que são gêmeos
🚨🗣️ Elliot Anderson on the physical nature of the game and the early incident with Enzo Fernández:
"To be completely honest, the first ten minutes were an absolute blur. I remember turning to protect the ball, and the next thing I know, I felt a massive knock on the back of my head from Enzo. Everything went dark, and I was completely out for a few seconds.
When I finally came to, the medical staff were asking me if I knew where I was. But it’s a World Cup semi-final, you don't come off the pitch unless your legs are broken. You just keep fighting. But when you look back at that moment... how a player can intentionally strike someone in the back of the head and only get a verbal warning, I will never understand. It immediately set the tone for the refereeing for the rest of the night. We came out here expecting a football match, but it felt like they were allowed to play by a completely different set of rules."
👀🇦🇷 Después de decir que esta vez el arbitraje no influyó, me pidieron revisar el partido con detalle y encontré esto.
Enzo Fernández, autor del gol del empate de Argentina, no debió terminar el encuentro.
Al minuto 3 lanzó un codazo en la nuca a un jugador inglés, sin ninguna posibilidad de disputar el balón. Si se hubiera aplicado el mismo rigor arbitral que vimos contra Suiza y Egipto, esa acción perfectamente pudo terminar en expulsión. Pero no solo no fue roja… ni siquiera fue amarilla.
Minutos después, el mismo Enzo cortó un contragolpe de Inglaterra con una zancadilla al borde del área. ¿La sanción? Tampoco hubo amarilla.
Desde el primer tiempo, Enzo debió estar expulsado. Si una acción así hubiera sido contra Messi, difícilmente el infractor se salvaría.
Por cierto, guarden el video porque la FIFA los anda borrando.
Il y a ZERO politique antisémite dans le programme de Mélenchon.
Au contraire : la lutte unitaire contre le colonialisme sioniste est un enjeu PRIORITAIRE du combat contre l'antisémitisme, car assimiler le sionisme et le judaïsme comme vs le faites est une politique antisémite.