A ruling billed as a win for creators would quietly strip foreign ones of any U.S. termination rights. Now most of the music and film industry is asking the Supreme Court to undo it. Full story, up now on Copyright Lately:
https://t.co/KFSxvEzJ70
@ggreenwald What does "due process" mean in the context of a political campaign? We have rules of procedure and evidence in civil and criminal legal proceedings, but what's your suggestion for the due process "rules" in a context like this?
@jacklgoldsmith These issues will soon be joined in the district court in the Perlmutter case, where cross-motions for summary judgment are fully briefed and the court yesterday ordered additional briefing in light of Slaughter.
@dilanesper Singling out a particular medium of expression for taxation would likely violate the First Amendment. See Minneapolis Star v. Minnesota Comm'r, 460 U.S. 575 (1983). https://t.co/mrHbIq1lqs
I wrote a poem. It's called, "LA Restaurants with Four Letter Names"
Alma
Alta
Etra
Dune
Yala
Ryla
Orla
Woon
Anzu
Nobu
Maru
Gwen
Dama
Noma
Noya
Shin
Sora
Sogo
Soko
Shor
Capo
Kato
Little Door
@SinaiLawFirm I agree that lots of people (myself included) prefer to live in a SFR like the left. But if the goal is more housing in CA (at least in cities near the coast) that people "can afford," the only viable option is the right.
@deanwball@johnloeber If the question is “what will a court do?”, I agree there’s a good chance it would say there’s liability on the part of OpenAI. The Ds in the social media cases have cited the cases from the 70s and 80s holding no duty to viewers/listeners of expressive works, to no avail.
@johnloeber@deanwball Relevant precedent is Winter v. Putnam’s (encyclopedia publisher had no duty to reader injured by relying on encyclopedia). But question is whether different outcome for ChatGPT because of specific advice to user. https://t.co/jJytwm2tZd
@myacatt51@CohenSite Letter from my great uncle, stationed at a US Army airbase in England, to his father in Miami Beach (north of 5th), November 1944.
I was using ChatGPT for legal advice and it decided to completely hallucinate some preposterous nonsense about how growing wheat to use on my own farm somehow constitutes interstate commerce