Schalke wartet am Gästeparkplatz ohne interesse der Polizei, #FCBayern kommt an und wird eingekesselt
Wenn das nicht von #NRW gewollt wurde
#S04FCB#ACAB
Kurz vor der Landtagswahl in Sachsen-Anhalt befindet sich die politische und mediale Elite im Panikmodus. Statt sachlicher Debatten dominieren Drohungen, Belehrungen und pauschale Abstempelungen der ostdeutschen Wähler:
https://t.co/GTdp3dEkkm
NIUS Live machte die Deutschlandflagge am Magdeburger Domplatz bekannt: Eine Reinigungsfirma hatte begonnen, Schwarz-Rot-Gold wegzuputzen, vor dem Antifa-Fest am Samstag – doch offenbar ohne größeren Erfolg:
https://t.co/Yp2VKpwQ4S
Am Freitag um 15.35 Uhr fielen alle Daten über kritische Infrastruktur in der deutschen Hauptstadt Berlin in die Hände von Kriminellen und Terroristen. Um 17.45 Uhr gingen Bürgermeister Kai Wegner und Bundeskanzler Friedrich Merz, die schon mal gemeinsam einen Terroranschlag in Berlin vergeigt haben, erstmal ganz entspannt zum Basketball. Vermutlich weil es gerade kein Tennisspiel gab. Diesen Leuten darf man einfach nicht das Land anvertrauen.
++Drohnen++
Als die Zahl schwerer Erkältungen normal war (rot), zeigte die @tagesschau täglich PCR-Zahlen, um eine Pandemie vorzutäuschen (blau). Derzeit berichtet sie täglich über „Putin-Drohnen”, um eine Kriegsgefahr vorzutäuschen.
Hintergrund: Sehen Sie in der blauen Kurve das kleine Hügelchen Anfang 2020? Es sollte den ersten Lockdown rechtfertigen.
Und warum explodierten die PCR-Zahlen im Frühjahr 2022, ohne dass ein Lockdown verhängt wurde? Petra Köpping und Karl Lauterbach erzählten es bei Markus Lanz: Sie zählten inzwischen Schnelltests entgegen dem Protokoll als PCR-Tests. Damit wurde Angst erzeugt gemacht für die allgemeine Impfpflicht. Nach deren Scheitern liefen die Massentests aus.
Das ganze ist ein Musterbeispiel dafür, wie Menschen von Lügen überzeugt werden können, wenn man diese nur oft genug wiederholt: Obwohl niemand in seiner Umgebung ein Massensterben sah, wurde genau das von der Regierung und ihren Sendern suggeriert.
Derzeit kommen täglich Stories über Drohnen, die z. B. von einem Busfahrer per Kung-Fu erlegt werden. Eine Beleidigung der Intelligenz, doch fürchte ich, dass es erneut funktionieren wird. Das sind wir im Weltkrieg.
The Most Destructive Intellectual Project of the Twentieth Century.
The Frankfurt School. You should know what it was, what it built, and why you are still living inside it.
1. The Institute for Social Research was founded in Frankfurt in 1923 and relocated to Columbia University in 1934 when Hitler came to power. The civilization they had decided to dismantle gave them refuge when another tried to kill them. They spent the next five decades producing the theoretical infrastructure for that dismantling. Western civilization itself was the problem: reason, the Enlightenment, the family, tradition, authority. Not reformed. Dismantled.
2. They called it Critical Theory – and the name is the program. Everything is to be criticized; nothing is to be built. In The Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944), Adorno and Horkheimer argued that Western reason — the reason that produced Newton and the rule of law — contained the seeds of Auschwitz. Not that reason had been misused, but that reason itself, taken to its conclusion, produces the death camp. This was not a critique of institutions. It was an indictment of the civilization itself.
3. Adorno gave them the psychological weapon. The Authoritarian Personality (1950) classified conservatism, religious faith, patriotism, and the traditional family not as political positions but as symptoms of a proto-fascist personality. If you believe in the nation or the father’s authority, you are pre-fascist. The opponent was no longer wrong – he was sick. You don’t argue with a pathology. You treat it.
This made dialogue impossible. You don’t persuade someone who is wrong; you diagnose someone who is sick. Politics becomes therapy, and disagreement becomes pathology.
4. Marcuse gave them the political weapon. Repressive Tolerance (1965) argued that tolerating wrong ideas is itself oppression. True tolerance therefore requires suppressing intolerant ideas. The left decides which ideas are intolerant. Everyone else is silenced – not despite tolerance, but "in its name." Censorship dressed in the vocabulary of liberation.
5. The generation that read Marcuse at Columbia, Berkeley, and Yale went on to run universities, media, foundations, NGOs, content moderation departments, and the EU regulatory apparatus. They implemented the argument sincerely because they had been taught it as philosophy. This was the Frankfurt School’s greatest achievement: it produced true believers.
6. French Theory picked up the tools and made them aesthetic. Foucault made the critique of power literary. Derrida made the critique of meaning philosophical. Deleuze made the critique of identity elegant. A political program became a cultural sensibility. You can argue with a program. A sensibility is in the air you breathe. By the time these ideas reached the American campus through the French conduit, they were no longer ideology. They were the water. The fish did not know they were wet.
7. A civilization stands on three pillars: truth exists and is accessible to reason; good is distinguishable from evil; and there is an inheritance worth transmitting. The Frankfurt School attacked all three – systematically and with considerable intellectual sophistication. It produced a generation that knows how to deconstruct and has forgotten how to build. That sees power everywhere and beauty nowhere.
The ultimate achievement was to make destruction feel like progress. Every inherited institution became suspect; every constraint became oppression; every act of preservation became reactionary. Deconstruction became the default, while construction became something that needed to justify itself.
The answer is not another theory.
It is the thing the Frankfurt School most feared: the builder who simply builds, the scientist who follows the evidence, the father who transmits what was transmitted to him.
The deconstruction machine runs on the assumption that nothing is worth building.
Prove it wrong.
Tell the truth, have courage, and build.
Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.
Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.
1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.
2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.
3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.
4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.
5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.
6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.
7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.
Ja, Lorenz Meyer, die Menschen aus Sachsen-Anhalt, die überlegen, ihr Kreuz bei der AfD zu setzen, lesen am Samstag den zwölfteiligen Faden des radioeins- und Übermedien-Medienjournalists auf BlueSky. Perfektes Beispiel für den selbstreferenziellen Charakter dieser Bubble.
Interessanter Nebensatz im Wirtschaftsmagazin: "...zudem wächst der Anteil von Bevölkerungsgruppen, für die Alkohol kulturell oder religiös bedingt ein Tabuthema ist."
Wenn der zaghaft Wirtschaftsaufschwung, der jetzt verkündet wird, tatsächlich auf das Sondervermögen zurückgeht, dann werden wir nächstes Jahr ein weiteres brauchen, oder übersehe ich da was?