max reasoning gpt-5 is as intelligent as any far-right-tail human i've ever met.
i'm calling it now: whatever they're cooking today, already beyond human IQ upper bounds. we've broken through.
a +n sigma childhood introduces an entropic disruption into the self-social equilibrium such that it is very unlikely not to deform some developmental branches imo, for better or worse
common corr.: high-IQ -> substance abuse one decade later. uncommon corr.: high-IQ -> [...] -> 1st % BF for age cohort
IQ-independent (as far as I can tell): avoidant attachment patterns
my teenaged strange fixation on vexillology was a subset of a childhood fascination for symbols
which itself iterated on a lifelong obsession with all which transcends
which itself emerged as artifact in the physiological machinatings of my Will to Power
@prismaticflow would be great, we'll schedule smth
my psychic constitution developed also some lopsided branches orthogonal to IQ-causality (early-life extreme luck & enantiodromic lack thereof) so it would be interesting to compare our resulting matrices
Hierarchies are built around scarcity - cultural (both acquisition & production) trends to zero, so it must pivot to piggybacking off whatever current status economy (social media).
But most will go straight to the source. Grift is the new art.
Masculinity broadly ceased to concern itself with excellence if inscribed within the humanities because it no longer translates to capital (social, material) in enough efficiency to justify the opportunity cost
@PinstripeBungle 50 years ago it was different. At my (all male, exam public school) they were reading Roth, Kosinski, Joyce, Barthelme, Malraux, Mailer on their own. Plus Mario Puzo, Leon Uris, Asimov, EE 'Doc' Smith, 'Mack Bolan' etc.
In the 19th c., wealth and cultural proficiency were one and the same - partly driven by the nouveau richeβs status feud against the aristocracy.
That semantics began to drift with eradication of the Old Regimeβs last remnants, and it is entirely gone today