⭐️ OUT NOW ⭐️
My book is now printed and available and even for an affordable price for an academic volume. More infos to come!
Wipf&Stock: https://t.co/7NZQv2dcBi
Amazon:
https://t.co/PjHOyAhcYQ
https://t.co/pncbxTAEZR
#glorystory#theologyofrelationship
Die Bibel ist Gottes autorisierte Beziehungsgeschichte mit den Menschen, die zu Jesus Christus führt.
https://t.co/WHwC8QSMDp
#bibel#hermeneutik#auslegung
Wenn es zwischen Gott und Menschen wirklich eine Beziehung ist, dann hat das Auswirkungen auf so ziemlich alles:
Neue Podcast-Episode: BEZIEHOLOGIE #5.1 - Eine Theologie der Beziehung
#beziehologie#beziehung#theologie#podcast
https://t.co/ftIQjbz2DX
@philip_miti @theologygurl @glennbutner@pgziegler1 @jtoddbillings @alisteremcgrath@CWoznicki I understand why one would think that. However, I would propose that it is not so easy to get what he actually refers to by certain terms and that one must understand his overall view (which was still in process in Man in Revolt). Ps: twitter is not ideal for indepth discussions.
@philip_miti @theologygurl @glennbutner@pgziegler1 @jtoddbillings @alisteremcgrath@CWoznicki 5 Ps: and yes, English translations sometimes messed up the original German and complicated things… Here „mind“ and „mental“ is simply wrong and misleading!
@philip_miti @theologygurl @glennbutner@pgziegler1 @jtoddbillings @alisteremcgrath@CWoznicki 4 maybe this helps. I have written briefly about Brunner‘s anthropological ontology (imago dei) and this might help (chapter 4), since one must understand that relationship is Brunner‘s leitmotif throughout - this had already started in Man in Revolt.
@philip_miti @theologygurl @glennbutner@pgziegler1 @jtoddbillings @alisteremcgrath@CWoznicki 3 „Seelisches Material“ means that the human‘s being towards God is within this physical and psychological body, today we would say „embodied“. This is „geistig-seelisch-leibliche Totalität“.
His main point is that one must differentiate but at the same time cannot take apart.
@philip_miti @theologygurl @glennbutner@pgziegler1 @jtoddbillings @alisteremcgrath@CWoznicki 2 Yes, Brunner is sometimes unclear with the terms (see chapter 3a in my book https://t.co/t5HgoYIerm).
Here, I think he refers with „Geist“ to the human being as imago dei, his being towards God, his being created as a relational being.
@philip_miti @theologygurl @glennbutner@pgziegler1 @jtoddbillings @alisteremcgrath@CWoznicki 1 Hi there
I guess, I might be considered someone who knows Brunner a bit…
I am not quite sure what the initial question is but I can try to answer some concering the German text here:
Personsein = being a person
Geistsein = being spirit
Podcast-Folge #2.2 zur Frage: Was ist Beziehung? Es geht um Nähe, Intimität, Macht & Freiheit. Überall wo du Podcasts hörst oder via https://t.co/25WMxHBU84
Neue Podcast-Episode draussen: BEZIEHOLOGIE #2.1
Was ist Beziehung? Impulse aus der Beziehungswissenschaft
https://t.co/CujZYvX5MG oder überall wo es Podcasts gibt.
#beziehung#beziehologie#relationshipscience