Leftists love terror attacks. Tolerance is the highest virtue for a leftist, and terror attacks give them something to visibly tolerate.
And for leftists, the communal takes precedence over the individual, and terror attacks allow the community to "come together" (see Hannah Spencer on Newsnight) at the expense of individuals.
They also think the West deserves it, as punishment for colonialism/racism/capitalism/whiteness etc.
And they like to see oppressed minorities expressing their authentic culture.
Leftists love terror attacks.
Man who resigned from Manchester Mayoral post to take an MP's job because his idiot party couldn't find a single candidate from 402 MPs, says it's a "gimmick"...
(and he's also not offered to pay costs!)
The only important thing in politics is that Labour, and the high status progressive class as a whole, are defeated; their project destroyed, and the damage they’ve inflicted repaired. I don’t particularly care who does it to be honest.
Can you name the apartheid state?
A small state, established on the ruins of empire, that defines itself as the nation-state of one specific people. Its language, its symbols, its character are reserved by law for that people alone.
A quarter of its population belongs to a different ethnic group. Many of them were born there. Their parents were born there. And yet the state refuses them citizenship. Instead, it issues them a special passport marking them as something less. They cannot vote. They are barred from entire categories of employment. A permanent, legally defined underclass, sorted by ethnicity and by when their families arrived.
The state demands loyalty tests. Tens of thousands of members of this minority, elderly people among them, are ordered to prove their allegiance and their command of the ruling nation's language. Those who fail receive letters: leave within 30 days or be removed by force. Grandmothers who have lived in the same apartment for fifty years are told to pack. Those who refuse can be held in detention centers while the state processes their expulsion.
The state didn't stop there. It shut down the minority's media outlets. It abolished education in their mother tongue, down to the last school. It demolished their monuments and memorials. It stopped admitting members of their ethnic group at the border. Officials openly describe all of this as protecting the demographic and cultural security of the majority nation.
How many UN resolutions has this country received? How many ICJ hearings? How many sanctions bills are moving through Western parliaments right now?
How many students are camped on university lawns for the grandmothers in detention? How many celebrities have posted the infographic? How many artists have cancelled their shows there? How many cities have voted to divest?
When did you last see a documentary about the stateless quarter of its population? A hashtag? A march? A single foreign minister expressing even mild concern?
The answer to every one of these questions is zero.
The country is Latvia. EU member. NATO member. Funded by Brussels, defended by Western armies, criticized by no one. Everything above is happening right now, in 2026, inside the European Union.
And now a few questions for the apartheid crowd. You. The ones with the word ready to go, the flags, the chants, the infographics. Where are you on this one? You didn't know? Or you knew and it didn't fit?
You scream about second-class citizens. Latvia has them by law, a quarter of the country. Where's your tent?
You cry about people being expelled from their homes. Latvia is deporting pensioners over a language exam. Where's your hashtag?
You say you're against ethnostates. Here's one, official, funded by the EU. Where's your boycott list?
Someone handed you a word, told you where to point it, and you pointed. You didn't check the facts then. You're not checking them now.
@Keir_Starmer There may be a place somewhere trillions of light years away at the furthest edges of our vast universe that has experienced an event more fucking cringe than this.
But I doubt it.
🇬🇧 THEY TOLD YOU A STORY. 🇬🇧
Colonisers. Slavers. Oppressors. And you were supposed to feel ashamed.
Not for what you done... But for WHO YOU ARE. 🇬🇧
So we tested it. Britain wrote everything down, so we opened the books. 📖
Turns out fewer than 1 man in 10 could vote in the year Britain banned the slave trade. No woman could. Your ancestors could hang for stealing a sheep, get shipped across the world for petty theft, or go down a mine at 8 years old. In Manchester, the average age of death in a labouring family was 17.
They weren't running the slave trade. They were underneath it too.
Which is what makes what happened next worth knowing.
In 1772 an enslaved man named James Somerset walked free from an English court, because English law couldn't hold a slave.
In 1791, 300,000 families just stopped buying slave sugar. No march, no riot, just a decision made at 300,000 kitchen tables.
In 1792, 519 petitions carrying 390,000 names hit Parliament, most signed by people who couldn't vote themselves.
In 1807, Britain banned the trade.
Then the slave owners sent Britain a bill for the 800,000 people they still held. 💷 £20 million. About 40% of the entire government budget at the time.
The Treasury says it wasn't paid off until 2015. So if your family paid British tax before then, they helped buy 800,000 people their freedom.
From 1808 the Royal Navy spent 60 years hunting slave ships at sea: 1,600 stopped, 150,000 people freed, and 1,600 British sailors dead, mostly of disease, buried thousands of miles from home. ⚓
In 1816 they ended two centuries of Barbary corsairs enslaving Europeans.
In 1896 a war that lasted 38 minutes ended slavery in Zanzibar. 🇹🇿
Almost every country on Earth outlaws slavery today.
That fight was paid for largely at British expense, by British hands.🇬🇧
So why haven't you heard any of this?
Because within living memory, someone rewrote the story. You got taught the crime. Not the cure.
The powerful exploited the world. They exploited their own people first. It was those people who ended slavery. 🇬🇧
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
History got rewritten once, in living memory, by no one who was ever named or held to account.
We are ordinary people doing what ordinary people have always done. Opening the books. Refusing to look away.
This is how we fight back. Fact by fact. Story by story. Name by name.
We are the home of British heroes. There is a place for you in it.
If you can afford to support what we do: https://t.co/rih7iKwnvf
Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
I don’t know if you’re aware, but there’s a channel on YouTube called “Cave Productions” that is uploading all of your podcasts in their entirety. Reading through the comments, it’s clear that people aren’t aware that it’s not actually your channel as they are also using your cover art.
On balance, this is good news. But I am not alone in thinking juries work in homogeneous, not tribal or sectarian societies, where jurors will always back defendants or victims from their own community.
Will the jury system still exist in 50 years time?
Depuis 50 ans, la gauche a réussi le plus grand hold-up intellectuel de l'histoire moderne.
Pas avec des armes. Pas avec des lois. Avec des mots.
Et honnêtement ? Chapeau. C'est génial. C'est diabolique. C'est du grand art.
Ils ont compris une chose qu'Orwell avait écrite noir sur blanc dans 1984 : celui qui contrôle le langage contrôle la pensée. Change les mots, et tu changes ce que les gens sont capables de penser. Rétrécis le vocabulaire, et tu rétrécis le champ du possible.
Dans 1984, ce n'est pas un détail. C'est le cœur du réacteur. Le ministère de la Vérité fabrique les mensonges. Le ministère de l'Amour torture. Le ministère de la Paix fait la guerre. « La guerre c'est la paix, la liberté c'est l'esclavage. » La novlangue ne décrit pas le monde — elle le remplace.
Et c'est exactement ce qui s'est passé. Regardez la mécanique :
Le « progressisme » ? C'est l'anti-progrès. Ceux qui bloquent le nucléaire, qui freinent la tech, qui diabolisent la croissance, qui rêvent de décroissance et veulent punir ceux qui construisent. Le mot dit « avant ». Le projet dit « arrière ».
L'« antiracisme » ? Il a réinjecté la race partout. Il assigne les gens à leur couleur, les enferme dans des cases, dresse les groupes les uns contre les autres. Un mouvement censé effacer la race l'a remise au centre de tout. Il a fabriqué le racisme qu'il prétend combattre.
Les croisades « contre l'homophobie » ? Elles crispent, elles clivent, elles imposent — et fabriquent en retour une partie du rejet qu'elles disaient vouloir éteindre.
La « protection » façon Union européenne ? C'est du flicage. On te surveille « pour ton bien », on te censure « pour te protéger », on te contrôle « pour ta sécurité ». Chaque mot est une inversion. Le vocabulaire de la bienveillance au service d'un projet orwellien.
Et le plus beau dans l'arnaque, c'est le verrou. Le piège parfait.
Aujourd'hui, des millions de gens lucides, qui voient parfaitement le problème… se taisent. Pourquoi ? Parce qu'ils refusent d'être traités de « racistes ». Sauf qu'être « antiraciste » au sens où le mot a été retourné, c'est précisément devenir raciste. Ils ont piégé les gens avec leur propre morale. Échec et mat.
Voilà le chef-d'œuvre : ils n'ont pas eu besoin de vous convaincre. Ils ont juste rendu le désaccord impensable, en confisquant les mots pour le formuler.
Alors oui — respect. Bonne guerre. Ils ont joué une manche, et ils l'ont gagnée.
Mais il y a un truc que la novlangue n'avait pas prévu.
Tout le monde a compris.
Le voile est tombé. Les mots reprennent leur poids. Et une inversion sémantique ne survit pas à l'instant précis où les gens la voient à l'œil nu. Ça, c'est terminé.
On reprend les mots. On reprend le réel. On reprend la partie.
To the Metropolitan Police,
You were the gold standard. The model every nation copied. When Scotland Yard spoke, criminals listened. That badge meant integrity. It meant courage. It meant the law applied equally, without fear or favour.
Look at you now.
You are a punchline. A cautionary tale. A force that clears up fewer than one in ten burglaries while your officers film TikTok videos in uniform. You arrested a man in Lancashire at dawn for a Facebook post in 2024 while grooming gangs operated in Rochdale for years with barely a raised eyebrow. You invented non-crime hate incidents so you could harass pensioners for wrongthink while real victims wait on hold.
You kneeled for mobs in 2020 while statues fell and businesses burned. You stood aside while extremists marched with impunity, then raided homes over memes. You have turned the oldest police force in the world into a politicised enforcement squad for the narrative, not the public.
You chose diversity dashboards over clear-up rates. You chose community engagement over enforcement. You chose the approval of NGOs and Twitter mobs over the safety of the people who pay your wages. You chose feelings over facts, and political safety over actual policing.
You did not lose your way. You sold it. Slowly, deliberately, one diversity training course at a time, one apology tweet at a time, one decision to stand down while crime happened in front of you.
The British people see you now. We see the double standards. We see the collapse in basic standards. We see a force that looks more like political commissars than police officers. We see officers who remember their oath sidelined while the ideologues get promoted.
You wanted to be political enforcers. Congratulations. You got your wish. Now you get treated like political operatives. No more benefit of the doubt. No more automatic respect. You burned that.
The mask is off. The receipts are published. The record is being kept.
We are watching.
Quite so. The standard is, for Jews, "If you can't defend yourselves from mass murder without killing children, then you have no right to defend yourselves." For Palestinians: "If your great-grandparents or distant cousins lost property after starting an aggressive war and losing, then go ahead and kill children; also rape, take hostages and torture them, regardless of whether that gets you that property."
Tucker Carlson keeps telling his audience—either directly or laundered through guests—that Islam is no threat to the West and is a better friend to Christians than Israel is.
@DanBurmawy spent 19 years inside the worldview Tucker is now defending. He grew up Muslim in Jordan, converted to Christianity, and cannot go home now. He says that defending Israel there is treated as a worse offense than apostasy itself.
In our conversation, Danny didn’t mince words: “Tucker Carlson doesn't love Christians…When you defend the same group oppressing your brothers and sisters...when you paint Christians in Israel as oppressed and persecuted, you're a deceiver, you're a liar, you are an enemy of Christians.”
Islam was never a better friend to Christians than Israel. Tucker knows that. He's just building a coalition where hating Israel is the only membership requirement.