betsy chacha

***NO DMs***

[Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 @DiligentDenizen]

Please REPOST the SPACE 👆🏻👀🇺🇸

[Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 @DiligentDenizen]

https://t.co/Bv9fi3Z5q1

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@JackPosobiec Are you sure you weren’t looking here? 🤪

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

Case closed.

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@__0HOUR1_ Okie dokie 🙄

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@doqholliday They’re up to something!

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@AngelFallen7 She is diabolical! And she gave them the first interview! She was just throwing it back in everybody’s face right from the beginning! Did not give a crap!

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@RealCandaceO I just pray TR makes it through the weekend for a fair trial! They are up to something!!! 🙏

[RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅 @Ryanmatta]

Why does is seem like the feds are planning on killing Tyler Robinson this weekend? Reporters inside the courtroom are claiming that no high resolution footage of Tyler Robinson was shown during today’s trial.

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@bennyjohnson you are FOS!

[Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 @DiligentDenizen]

‼️🇺🇸: There's NO VIDEO OF the ACTUAL CHARLIE KIRK SHOOTING per Utah State Prosecutor —7/7/2026. 👀

ANYONE TELLING YOU OTHERWISE is LYING and SHOULD BE UNFOLLOWED.

They are tools of the state. 🫡

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@DiligentDenizen @RealCandaceO I’ve been unfollowing lying gaslighting idiots all week!!!!

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@objectfanatic Just added to my list of favorite words 🫶🌸🦩

🍯〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜~🍯
〰️〰️〰️Honeydoodle〰️〰️〰️
🍯〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜〜~🍯

[🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 @LionelMedia]

I saw the video of Tyler shooting Charlie.

Great, can we see it?

No.

Why not?

Just take my word for it.

So, you really didn't see anything.

No, I did.

So, let's see it.

No.

Why?

Because.

Because what?

Candace Owens.

Is that all you can say?

Seems like that.

[Brandi Siciliani @brandisiciliani]

@bennyjohnson @AndrewKolvet https://t.co/dFI2QBNg5a

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@bennyjohnson @Anc_Aesthetics You are so FULL OF SHIT!!!!!!!

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@IanCarrollShow @nondescriptive_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@IanCarrollShow @benshapiro Priceless!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Vivian Kubrick @ViKu1111]

Andrew

Let me offer advice.

Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.

When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.

Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.

That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.

Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.

Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.

You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.

That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.

So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.

Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.

You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.

@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @JohnMappin @ImMappin @joekent16jan19 @TRobinsonNewEra @LionelMedia @IanCarrollShow @AwakenWithJP @jimmy_dore @OwenBenjamin @leahfiles @realstewpeters @EstulinVz @RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith
@BlakeSNeff @TPUSA @DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@Iwendtster There is nothing random or coincidental about any of this shit!

[betsy chacha @BetsyChacha]

@AngelFallen7 🤣🤣🤣