Here’s what the National Academies actually said, since you left out some important words:
“Although the committee recommended that NSF conduct a revisioning and restructuring exercise to consider how the next iteration of the initiative could meet specific future needs of ocean scientists, it said that exercise should be separate and independent from the regular review and renewal of the initiative. The committee recommended that NSF continue funding for core infrastructure that supports three research priorities, including the Ocean Observatories Initiative.”
They recommended a revisioning and restructuring exercise, not actually dismantling the initiative. Quite the opposite, actually.
Truth matters.
The Trump Administration controls the NSF, whether you avoid that reality or not. Otherwise he wouldn’t have fired 22 of the 25-member board in April, conveniently followed by the OOI descoping announcement in May. Of course, this is after he attempted to end the program through major budget cuts starting last year.
But hey, you enjoy living in your blissfully ignorant bubble and supporting a corrupt, deranged narcissist ☺️.
@DrSpongeBob5@PragmaticTd@kevinnbass It's not. You don't use a poll that asked a general question about voting protecting to falsely attribute support to a specific bill.
The 80% number doesn't come from any poll on the SAVE act.
His number is a lie
@cjspeedy72@PragmaticTd@L_B_Dyno@TheRocSupremacy Did Jay z come out and confirm that’s what he meant when he said it?
Jay z said all four of those meanings were why he said it?
If not then he DID make it up retard.
Yall are just as dumb as the Drake stans
@TheNativist_@PragmaticTd On the contrary, he says u all are illiterate for not understanding it was a honest wording error.
Your issue is he insulted ppl while doing it, and that he is black.
But this all makes sense as you supported a Trump who is notorious for lies, faux pas and equivocation
@DeputyDoughnut@PragmaticTd@jokerwaffenfren@jakeshieldsajj If u search for something you will find it, that’s not the same as the whole profile is full of that word.
Also a person defending themselves from racist calling them retatded or the N word isn’t the same as Paul randomly calling blacks the N word
@SpazPhoenix@PragmaticTd@LakeSipper@miquellanation@MrGee54 No, it’s oppressive to steal land, hoard wealth, destroy environments, wage asymmetrical war, create unethical trade deals, and cause political destabilization in black and brown countries then blame them for not defending themselves well enough
@ElDuderinoGG@PragmaticTd@mgodissavior@William226160 He wasn’t assaulted before he grabbed his gun. Read the police report.
Additionally if you instigate a situation ( like harassment or DTP) then you lose claim to self defense.
This is why he is locked up and the other guy isn’t. Learn law
@TheFactFinderr@happyfilmore500@PragmaticTd@Danoizemaker11@FoxNews The literal source your pulling from literally says “The data should not be used to make causal conclusions about race and crime.”
It says there are multiple causalities to crime then list the various factors and u ignored ALL of them and focused on race. Text book Cherry pick