Wellness Matters

Be curious. It might just change your mind.

[Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM @echipiuk]

This should outrage every Canadian, regardless of what you thought about the Freedom Convoy.

The federal government compiled a blacklist of citizens it considered Freedom Convoy supporters, and that information was reportedly circulated to thousands of corporations and financial institutions.

This is what weaponizing government against citizens who disagree with it looks like.

Government authorities identifying citizens based on their politics and distributing that information into the private sector should set off every alarm bell in a free and democratic society.

Where was the lawful authority for this?

Governments are creatures of statute. They do not get to invent powers because they dislike a protest, its message, or the people supporting it. When government acts beyond the authority granted to it by law, that is ultra vires.

The power of the state is not a political weapon to be turned against citizens for dissenting from government policy.

That line should never be crossed. But it was. And until there is real accountability for those who authorized, enabled, and carried out these actions, public trust in our institutions will remain broken.

No amount of silence, deflection, or gaslighting will repair that trust. People remember what was done to them, their families, their friends, and their fellow citizens.

They will not simply forget.

[Dr. Simone Gold @drsimonegold]

July 2020. Steps of the Supreme Court. America’s Frontline Doctors stood in white coats and told the American people the truth the regime did not want spoken:

COVID was treatable.

Early treatment worked.

Nobody needed to die.

Lockdowns were never necessary.

We were censored within hours. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube erased the video. Careers were destroyed. Doctors were threatened. Patients were denied the medicine that could have saved them.

They called us dangerous.

They were the danger.

History has already rendered its verdict. We were right. They lied. And the people paid the price in lives, liberty, and lost years.

Watch it. Share it. Bookmark it.

Never let them memory-hole what they did.

The truth was never the threat.

Their power was.

[Castanet @CastanetNews]

Northern Health loses appeal in vaccine-related dismissal case #TerraceBC https://t.co/cRwKMGeifQ

[Barry Sharp @BarryESharp]

Another victory against the coercive vaccine mandates that destroyed careers, eroded Charter rights, and crippled our healthcare system. Dr. Jannie du Plessis, a 73-year-old pediatrician in Terrace with decades of service, just won big: the BC Court of Appeal on April 9, 2026, upheld the arbitrator’s award of over $388,000 for Northern Health’s breach of her renewable one-year service contracts. She had already stepped back from on-call duties after her 2019 heart surgery, handling most work by phone and telehealth. Northern Health terminated her in November 2021 solely for refusing the COVID-19 shot, yet they couldn’t prove the provincial immunization order even applied to her independent-contractor arrangement. The court saw through it, straight breach of contract, no justification.

This wasn’t justice delayed; it was taxpayer money flushed down the drain on a losing appeal by an authority that prioritized political obedience over evidence and patient care. Northern Health fired experienced doctors and nurses who posed zero threat in low-risk settings, ignored natural immunity and early treatment data that emerged by mid-2021, and helped create the very staffing shortages now plaguing BC emergency rooms and pediatric wards. The same pattern played out nationwide: mandates suspended informed consent, violated sections 2, 6, 7 and 15 of the Charter, and produced zero long-term public-health benefit once Omicron hit. Meanwhile, excess deaths jumped from roughly 15,000 in 2020 to 31,000 in 2022 during the booster rollout, myocarditis rates hit 299 per million young males after Moderna in Ontario alone, and vaccine injury compensation has paid out a pathetic $21 million on just 252 of over 3,000 claims. That is not “safe and effective”—that is a policy failure with real victims.

Every fired healthcare worker deserves the same accountability, including the class actions we’ve been pushing for since the mandates began. The Liberals under Trudeau and now Carney’s manufactured majority keep doubling down: Emergencies Act invocation ruled unreasonable and unconstitutional by Federal Court in 2024 and the Appeal Court in January 2026, yet they’re still dragging it to the Supreme Court while Canadians foot the bill for bank freezes, military surveillance of the Freedom Convoy, and the same top-down coercion. Add $2.35 trillion in federal debt, a carbon tax hammering families with roughly $1,160 extra costs per year, stalled resource projects worth over $670 billion, and endless foreign aid while our own affordability crisis explodes. This is not governance; it is evidence-free technocracy that puts globalist priorities ahead of Canadian citizens.

Enough. Release the full injury and death data. End the liability shields. Compensate every mandate victim and restore bodily autonomy as the non-negotiable foundation of a free society. These court losses for the health authorities are the beginning of the reckoning.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 HEALTH SEC. RFK JR. JUST EXPOSED IT

2 little girls without vaccinations for measles DIED in the hospital because the hospital refused to give them proper care.

They were part of the Mennonite community in Texas, who haven't been vaccinated since 1796

“I went to the funeral of one of those little girls, and I spent a day with the family of the other.”

“Both of them told me that when they took their children to the hospital, they were treated as pariahs. They were SHAMED."

RFK wants to treat unvaccinated people just as judiciously as the vaccinated:

“There’s a lot of people in this country who… are not going to vaccinate...I believe that we need to treat them with COMPASSION and UNDERSTANDING — and empathy, and get them the treatments that they would get anywhere else in the world!"

Masterclass. How could anyone oppose this?

H/t @EndTribalism

[Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® @P_McCulloughMD]

Review of Sean Hartman's Autopsy Found COVID-19 Vaccine was Cause of Death

Cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough @P_McCulloughMD reviewed this case and determined this young boy indeed died of fatal vaccine myocarditis.

M. Nathaniel Mead, Jessica Rose, William Makis, Kirk Milhoan, Nicolas Hulscher and Peter A. McCullough. Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH & INNOVATION. Jan-Mar 2025, VOL. 3, ISSUE 1, pp. 1-43, DOI 10.61577 ijcri.2025.100001 https://t.co/YZVgLy1M6m

[Matt Strauss @strauss_matt]

What is even the point of Parliament?

At Health Committee, we asked to see the PrescribeIT contracts, in which the Liberals blew $250 million on NOTHING.  

But Mark Carney’s Chief Filibuster Officer spent 2 hours talking to prevent us from seeing it.

I asked why at Question Period, but the Chief Filibuster Officer took the question and…. Filibustered.

That’s why I went to ask again tonight in the House:

[The Canadian Independent @canindependent]

WATCH: Explosive testimony from former chief toxicologist for Pfizer Europe before a recent German Parliamentary Committee; explains why the Pfizer vaccine should never have been released to the public and says its likely 60,000 people have died from the vaccine in Germany.

Dr. Sterz, former chief toxicologist for Pfizer Europe, testified before a March 19th, 2026 German Parliamentary Committee that the approval process for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine was dangerously rushed and bypassed fundamental safety standards. He testified that carcinogenicity studies which are tests designed to determine if a substance has the potential to cause cancer were entirely omitted due to time constraints and that reproductive toxicity tests in rats were too poorly executed to provide reliable data on pregnancy or fetal development. According to his testimony, the fast track process effectively sacrificed essential toxicity studies without justification, leading him to characterize the subsequent mass vaccination as a form of prohibited human experimentation where injuries were only monitored after the product reached the market.

The testimony highlights severe concerns regarding post marketing data and mortality rates. Dr. Sterz references internal reports citing over 1,200 suspected deaths from the vaccine within just two months of approval and suggests that, due to underreporting factors, the actual death toll in Germany could now be as high as 60,000 from the vaccine. He argues that the vaccine should have been withdrawn immediately upon these findings. Furthermore, he challenges the legal and medical consensus of a positive benefit risk profile, noting that Pfizer’s original clinical development did not focus on preventing severe illness or death. He points to the fact that age adjusted mortality in Germany rose in 2021 and 2022 as evidence that the vaccine did not provide the expected public health benefit.

Finally, Dr. Sterz alleges a significant discrepancy between the vaccine used in clinical trials and the one distributed to the public. He states that while the trial participants received a highly purified substance, the mass produced version was manufactured using E. coli bacteria to save costs. He claims this change resulted in significant contamination with bacterial DNA, which he warns could lead to a substantially increased risk of cancer for those who received the vaccine. Ultimately, he concludes that under proper regulatory procedures, Comirnaty would not have met the requirements for approval.

[Humanspective @Humanspective]

"Millions of lives saved" DEBUNKED.

New critique of the claims "millions of lives saved by covid mRNA vaccines" has been published.

A devastating indictment of Big Pharma and the regulators who approved new technology with zero liability. @JeffereyJaxen reveals the evidence to @delbigtree on @HighWireTalk:

JAXEN: “Based on the evidence reviewed in this article, we find no solid empirical foundation for the claim that [mRNA covid 'vaccines'] saved millions and millions of lives”

“the risk-benefit balance of the COVID-19 vaccines is, in fact, tilted toward the negative end”

[A Midwestern Doctor @MidwesternDoc]

We vaccinate a million newborns to prevent 1 case of Hep B. Even worse, the vax often causes autoimmune disease (it matches human nerves) and hasn't reduced hepatitis.

Here I reveal why it got forced upon us and why Trump said this practice is a disgrace
https://t.co/yhb1e3ZwGh

[Franco Terrazzano @franco_nomics]

Scrap the industrial carbon tax.

Scrap the hidden carbon tax in fuel regulations.

Scrap gas taxes.

Scrap the sales tax-on-tax.

[Lion Advocacy @LionAdvocacy]

Public Health Agency of Canada took over the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) on April 1, 2026. The VISP domain now redirects to a federal website that calls it the “Vaccine Impact Assistance Program” and it has scrubbed all payout & injury statistics. Truly next-level.

[Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦 @TamaraUgo]

DISTURBING! After years of scandal and delay, the Public Health Agency of Canada has not only renamed the Vaccine Injury Support Program to “Impact Assistance,” but they’ve also scrubbed all of the data!

Thankfully, I have receipts

[Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM @echipiuk]

While preparing for a brief on the independence petition due tomorrow, I came across this from the Supreme Court of Canada that is worth sharing:

“The right of the people to discuss and debate ideas forms the very foundation of democracy… For this reason, the Supreme Court of Canada has assiduously protected the right of each citizen to participate in political debate...

Permitting an effective voice for unpopular and minority views — views political parties may not embrace — is essential to deliberative democracy. The goal should be to bring the views of all citizens into the political arena for consideration, be they accepted or rejected at the end of the day. Free speech in the public square may not be curtailed merely because one might find the message unappetizing or the messenger distasteful…

The ability to engage in effective speech in the public square means nothing if it does not include the ability to attempt to persuade one’s fellow citizens through debate and discussion. This is the kernel from which reasoned political discourse emerges.

Freedom of expression must allow a citizen to give voice to her vision for her community and nation, to advocate change through the art of persuasion in the hope of improving her life and indeed the larger social, political and economic landscape…

Freedom of expression protects not only the individual who speaks the message, but also the recipient. Members of the public — as viewers, listeners and readers — have a right to information on public governance, absent which they cannot cast an informed vote.”

These are words from the Supreme Court of Canada that recognize the importance of debate and discussion, even when the views are unpopular, uncomfortable, or distasteful.

So when someone tries to shut down the conversation, shame you, or tell you certain topics should not even be discussed, remind them of that.

The answer is not silence or suppression.

A petition, a debate, even a controversial idea, these are not failures of the system. They are expressions of it.

The real risk is when we start deciding which views are acceptable to be heard.

Because once that line starts moving, it does not stop where you think it will.

So the question is:

Are we prepared to actually live this principle or do we only support it when we agree with the message?

Because the more you know and understand, the more effectively you can participate, ask better questions, and actually effect change.

[Shawn Buckley @Shawnbuckleylaw]

I’ve launched my Substack to share timely, in-depth, and uncensored legal and consitutional analysis you won’t find anywhere else.

If you want the full story—not the filtered version—this is where I’ll be posting full articles regularly.

Subscribe and stay informed.

Link in thread ⬇️

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Dr. Sabine Hazan just issued a chilling warning about the explosion of cancers in young people — and she believes the gut microbiome is the missing link.

Colon cancer at 18? Pancreatic cancer in young adults? Breast cancer rates surging since the 80s? She says something is fundamentally changing in humanity — and it's not just better diagnosis.

Key points from the clip:

- Colon cancer guidelines dropped from age 50 to 45 screenings because cases are appearing so much younger (she's seen an 18-year-old with it).

- Rectal bleeding in a young person should trigger colonoscopy — anything less is malpractice in her view.

- She suspects we're killing beneficial gut microbes (allowing harmful ones to dominate), creating an environment where cancers thrive.

- Known links already exist: Epstein-Barr → Burkitt's lymphoma, HPV → cervical cancer, H. pylori → gastric cancer.

- Her lab is now testing pancreatic cancer patients' stools for free (https://t.co/16DgFcNuoL) to hunt for microbiome signals that could enable earlier detection.

Her bold theory: In the future, we may discover all cancers are microbiome-related — or triggered by specific microbes.

This is not fringe speculation from a researcher who has been sounding alarms on microbiome disruption for years.

Are rising young-onset cancers a wake-up call about gut health — or something else entirely?

If you or someone you know has pancreatic cancer, she’s offering free stool testing to search for signals.

[Steve Saretsky @SteveSaretsky]

The federal government is refusing to publicly release an agreement with the Musqueam Band that recognizes Aboriginal title over a vast area of Metro Vancouver.

What is perhaps more perplexing is no mainstream media outlet has even reported on this agreement. https://t.co/W3wzyeIAs7

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

Imagine this: You are a sovereign individual. Your rights are not granted by the government but endowed by God.

You have credible information that the public doesn’t yet know. You verify it. You believe it can save lives.

So you do what free people are supposed to do.

You speak.

You publish it online. You build an audience. A community forms. Millions read, watch, and share. People write to you saying your work helped them think critically, ask better questions, maybe even protect their health.

You didn’t break the law. You didn’t fabricate data. You didn’t incite violence. You asked questions.

Then one day, without warning, everything disappears.

Your account is gone. Your reach collapses. Your years of work vanish from feeds overnight. Not because you deleted it. Not because a court found you guilty of anything.

But because a “nonprofit” based out of the UK issued a report labeling you a “misinformation superspreader.”

They pull a bogus stat out of thin air, then weaponize it to say you are “killing people.”

The media amplifies it. Night after night, news anchors repeat the same sinister lie about you.

The White House echoes it from the podium.

Officials pressure social media companies to “do more” to crack down on you.

And then it happens.

Your pages have been erased. Your channels have been demonetized. Your voice disappears from your followers’ feeds.

The First Amendment didn’t protect you. It was circumvented.

Millions who once had access to your message now receive only one narrative. The approved one. The one aligned with trillion-dollar interests and institutional power.

And your alleged crime?

Opening your mouth and telling the truth.

This sounds like something pulled straight from George Orwell’s 1984.

But it happened. Not to one person. But over a dozen, all triggered by a stat made out of thin air from overseas.

They were called the “Disinformation Dozen.”

The CCDH (Center for Countering Digital Hate) claimed that 65% of all anti-vaccine misinformation online came from just 12 individuals.

The reality? Facebook later admitted those 12 accounts were responsible for just 0.05% of vaccine-related content views on its platform.

This wasn’t a one-off attack. This was a blueprint.

After they got away with censoring the “Disinformation Dozen,” they went after you, they went after me, they went after all of us.

I was a healthcare worker who simply didn’t like the vax mandates. I started clipping doctors sharing information that went against the narrative.

They nuked my Twitter account not once, not twice, but three times.

I tried making more accounts. They blocked my phone number from creating new ones. And even if I could make more, they would have nuked those too.

I’m still pissed about this, and I can’t believe this actually happened in America.

But guess what? The tables are turning.

The censors are now the defendants.

They censored the speech. Now they must defend the silence.

The “Disinformation Dozen” is fighting back in federal court.

Ty and Charlene Bollinger (@TTAVOfficial) didn’t just write a “strongly-worded letter,” as Pam Bondi would say.

They filed a nearly 400-page federal lawsuit naming the State Department, the FBI, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, and major Big Tech platforms. The suit alleges a coordinated effort to manufacture a blacklist, pressure platforms, and erase lawful speech under the banner of “misinformation.”

“Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America,” Ty Bollinger says.

This case isn’t just about restoring their accounts. It’s about exposing how a foreign-funded report was amplified from the White House podium, used to justify deplatforming, and weaponized to silence millions of Americans.

It’s about whether the government can secretly pressure private companies to do what the Constitution forbids it from doing directly.

It’s about whether the First Amendment still means what it says.

Because if they can erase voices with millions of followers, they can erase yours too.

And now it’s your turn to decide whether free speech will be treated as a God-given right or a “privelege.”

First, watch the film. See the evidence. Understand how lies that were made out of thin air, like Fauci’s “six feet social distancing,” were also fabricated to censor voices like the “Disinformation Dozen” and yours truly.

Watch how the coordinated effort worked. Understand what happened so this never happens again.

Then, if you believe free speech still matters, support the legal fight.

These lawsuits are expensive. And those who did the censoring are counting on us to run out of money before we can hold them accountable.

Don’t let that happen.

When you donate, you’re not just helping Ty and Charlene. You’re standing up for every doctor who was deplatformed, every dissenting voice punished for asking questions, every unvaxxed worker fired from their job, every person denied service for being “unclean.”

You’re defending your voice, your children’s voices, and the generations that come after them.

Censorship is the disease. Freedom of speech is the cure.

If a precedent is set in court, it protects all of us.

If it fails, it’s only a matter of time before they attempt to silence us all again under the banner of the next “global emergency.”

What happens next depends on whether we act now or sit back and “hope” someone else defends our freedoms for us.

Ty and Charlene Bollinger have drawn the line in the sand. Now it’s up to us to back them.

“Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America.” — Ty Bollinger

Don’t let them normalize treating your God-given right to speak freely as a privilege.

Watch the film. Support the legal fight. Put the censors on trial. Make them answer in court for what they did.

WATCH THE FILM: https://t.co/D1rUOmEQd4

SUPPORT THE FIGHT: https://t.co/Q24P1p96TR

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full 20,000-word report below.

https://t.co/wEISr8mHWo

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

He proved unvaccinated kids were healthier. They revoked his license.

Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had FEWER doctor visits and BETTER health outcomes.

Here’s what his data showed:

Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated
Ear Pain – 3.4× higher
Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher
Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher
Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher
Asthma – 5.2× higher
Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher
Sinusitis – 4.3× higher
Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher
Anemia – 5.5× higher
Eczema – 4.5× higher
Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher
Dermatitis – 1.4× higher
Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher
Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher
Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher
ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group

*Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition*

Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.

Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.

Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.

The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids? 🧵