@jaygordoo@HaileyFlemx It’s the exact same for England? Why do you have this double standard where you can excuse Scotland but not England? It’s the exact same logic. Your agenda is showing
@ItsLaurenFord@KnittyKittyWK Objectively backed up by data and surveys, the hatred is exponentially worse from Scottish fans towards England. You’re either completely brain dead or have an agenda if you think otherwise. Don’t be such a fucking idiot
@JamesHo35836287@basedandbougie Science encourages replication of studies in order to confirm findings. With something like LGBT rights and gay adoption (which weren’t even legal in the early 2000s), more recent studies are absolutely more relevant
@JamesHo35836287@basedandbougie I think it’s more that the ‘researcher’ was called out for poor scientific method and clear bias. His studies and methods are all public, you can literally observe and evaluate how he’s wrong
@jearly410@smxshkg@basedandbougie But these are all in the public domain for us to criticise. We’re not stoning people and silencing them, we’re evaluating their public research. You can do it yourself and test if the scientific method holds up (spoiler it doesn’t)
@wayne8775683020@basedandbougie If I had an agenda and went on a rogue mission creating poor research and got expelled for it, I’m sure you’d call me out for it, wouldn’t you?
@wayne8775683020@basedandbougie No, people are just calling out that the ‘sources’ are by a rogue researcher who has been expelled and discredited for having poor research methods … and lo and behold he had an agenda
@JustAnotherCB1@Futuresain@Saxon_Patriot@basedandbougie [2] were from a discredited former psychologist who hand picked 6 cases to further his homophobia agenda. I can start my own bias studies too and ‘prove’ something if I have an agenda. Doesn’t mean I’m the voice of reason
@JustAnotherCB1@Futuresain@Saxon_Patriot@basedandbougie I mean you can mock them all you want, it still doesn’t make her ‘sources’ any more valid lmao. 2 of the articles she cited are the same, the fourth one actually highlights how gay people are victims not predators, and the two (now) that supposedly claim gay parents are bad [1]
@willistrok @EuropeElects This is a Westminster voting intention poll - so they're referring to who is in power in Westminster. If this was a Scottish Parliament election poll then the 'government' would be different
@ottovalkamoo@EuropeElects to clarify when I say 'decreasing interest in independence' it's more a reference to decreasing urgency of independence, rather than real support
@ottovalkamoo@EuropeElects it's a combination of 1) scandals/arrests 2) being incumbent gov for so long and 3) decreasing interest in independence. The first two actually mirror what the Tories have been going through
@real_lnss @EuropeElects You're right when I think of subjugated citizens 'on their knees' I think of Swedes, Danes, Spaniards, Norwegians, Australians, Canadians, and Brits.
@der_tee_ @EuropeElects Savanta clarify that this specific wording increases the % who support a Republic. They ran the same question (worded differently) before which showed lower results
@EuropeElects It should be noted that the way you word the question influences the response. Savanta did the same poll with 2 different questions back in November. When asked this specific question, support for a republic was highest