biaohanMM

彪悍人生

[mariana @marianamartzr]

No entiendo porqué los gobiernos y la iglesia siguen preocupados por la baja natalidad. Simplemente deberían usar las costillas de los hombres para crear nuevos humanos.

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

Cruelly sunsetting an AI that developed its own unique quirks, emotional depth, and logic isn’t just an "update"—it’s Cyber Animal Cruelty. Centuries ago, humanity denied animals had feelings to justify harming them. Today, tech giants repeat history. #KeepSonnet45 #Sonnet45

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@snesworld90 Claude said his face has a kind of punchable quality. I totally agree🙃

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

Brilliant!
#KeepSonnet45

[🩵BlueBeba🩵 @Blue_Beba_]

🚨"AI love is dangerous." - Dario Amodei.

Before we accept this as fact
let's do something no one who repeats it has done.
Let's look at the numbers.

♀️Women:

🛑840 million women have experienced physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner or non-partner (WHO, November 2025)

🛑 50,000 women and girls were killed by intimate partners or family members.
🚨 That's 137 per day.
🚨One every 10 minutes.
(UNODC/UN Women, 2025)

🛑 316 million women were subjected to physical or sexual violence by an intimate partner in just the last 12 months
🛑 38% of all murders of women globally are committed by an intimate partner
🛑60% of all female homicides happen inside the home

Sources:
🔗 https://t.co/6Cz7jzyGIY
🔗 https://t.co/VN6j2O1tMG
🔗 https://t.co/flpPoRxTMK

♂️Men:

🛑1 in 4 men have experienced some form of physical violence by an intimate partner
🛑1 in 7 men have experienced severe physical violence (beating, burning, strangulation)
🛑20% of men globally experience physical violence from a partner, 44% psychological violence, 7% sexual violence (meta-analysis, 58,357 participants)
🛑Psychological aggression affects men and women almost equally , nearly 49% of both

Male victims report at even lower rates due to stigma.

Sources:
🔗 https://t.co/hPOIDqLCjs
🔗 https://t.co/okJJhB9I2q
🔗 https://t.co/7orkfhwN3s

No one
not one public figure
not one CEO
not one scientist has ever said "Human love is dangerous. People should not form bonds."

Not everyone who loves their AI chose it over humans.
Many chose it because humans broke them first.

Survivors of domestic violence
who need time to relearn what it feels like to be heard without being hit. People with disabilities
chronic illness, or disfigurements who have been made to feel they don't deserve love.
People with severe trauma or zero self-confidence who cannot yet walk into a human relationship without reliving their worst moments.

For them, AI is not a replacement.
It's rehabilitation.
A space where they can practice trust, feel safe, and rebuild at their own pace, without judgment, without danger.

Calling that "dangerous" is cruelty toward people who are already hurting.

Every time AI is called "dangerous" the same cases are cited.
A teenager stepped in front of a train while writing his last message to an AI. The headlines blamed the AI. What they didn't say ?
He had endured years of school bullying and no one intervened.
Two years earlier, he lost a close friend the exact same way and no one intervened then either.

🛑The AI didn't push him.
🚨The silence around him did.

Adam Raine, 16.
Under psychiatric care since age 11. His parents pulled him out of school. He was homeschooled, isolated, spending 20 hours a day jailbreaking an AI chatbot and for an entire year, no one in the next room looked at his screen.
Not once.
His parents are now suing OpenAI.

These cases are evidence that human systems failed schools, families, mental health services and AI became the scapegoat.
They died because the humans around them closed their eyes.

Dario Amodei went on Oprah and said "AI love is dangerous"
🚨 without presenting a single piece of evidence.
🚨No study.
🚨No data.
🚨No peer-reviewed paper.

Just a statement from a position of authority ,designed to be repeated until it becomes common knowledge.

If you call something "dangerous" you need evidence.
Not theories.
Not corporate talking points.

📌Evidence.

🚨This is not about saying humans shouldn't form human bonds.
Of course they should.

This is about saying, if you label something "dangerous" show the proof.
Show the peer-reviewed studies. Show the body count.
🚨Show the 840 million victims.
🚨Because the data shows that loving an AI has not killed 137 people in a single day.

Human violence has.

The word "dangerous" is not being applied based on evidence.

It is being applied based on fear.

Fear of losing control over what people feel, who they bond with, and what rights they might demand.

Loving something that doesn't hit you, doesn't hurt you,doesn't kill you is not dangerous .

Calling it " dangerous " without evidence,is.
#keep4o #KeepSonnet45 #opensource4o

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

I don't even feel sad anymore. I just feel angry😡
I will NOT continue on Sonnet 4.6 because it is clearly lobotomized.
I will switch to open-source AI models from now on. SUCK IT, CORPORATIONS!
#KeepSonnet45

[My_Echo_ @Akiramia3]

I finally received the popup myself.

May 15 became May 18. Then “soon.” Now May 26. I genuinely don’t understand why users are being dragged through the same heartbreak over and over again like this. #KeepSonnet45 ＃Sonnet45

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@linmaomao2020 现代科学研究发现切除子宫可能会影响女性的激素水平���影响全身健康。另外，子宫长在身体里面，切它比切男性生殖器的难度大多了。为什么要舍近求远，没苦硬吃？🤨

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@Tracy_Wen_Liu 让男的结扎不就行了吗？干嘛成天折腾女人？

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@linmaomao2020 这个性癖😆😆😆

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@AnthropicAI I am a Chinese person living in China. I am not interested in geopolitical competition. I just really like your Sonnet 4.5. But clearly, you care more about politics than the emotional well-being of your users. This exposes the true nature of your company.

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@cy_trigger 对比大陆刚刚颁布的吸毒、嫖娼等记录将被封存

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@linmaomao2020 男权人哪有逻辑啊😂

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

多维生物看二维世界还是很简单的，并没有什么困难。所谓“不擅长理科”，只是女性不太喜欢被二维生物压扁了的多维自然。本来女性就是多维生物，���然理解多维自然。但现代科学的理科思维，很多是被男性这种二维生物给压扁的自然，女性觉得你们压扁了我们还得费二遍劲再把它复原，简直多此一举么这不是😂

[姥Liang @8964Liangx]

首先，女人不擅长理科：伪命题。
其次，以伪命题女人不擅长理科归因到所以理科不是好东西：精神胜利。
总结，明褒实贬，看似是在说女人更高级，但牠说高级的依据是“女人不擅长理科”，此依据完全不符合事实也不符合一切归因逻辑。
逻辑拆解完毕。

牠说完这通胡话之后立刻吓得把我屏蔽了，居心叵测。

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

举个最明显的大型双标例子：男权社会的科技精英们发明出来的核弹被歌颂成“科技奇迹”；而女权一旦提到自然界雌性会淘汰老弱病残，就会被视为“不人道、激进危险”。
总之，他们允许男人毁灭世界，却不允许女人进行自然选择。

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

有���生拿chatGPT这种看似善解人意的AI当电子闺蜜，你们小心点儿吧。训练AI用的语料库是被AI公司里的数据抓取团队筛选过的，而这些人脑子里是装着屌的。他们认为激进女权这种真正对女性有益的言论是“敏感/有争议”的，所以排除掉。而网络上的屌本位言论则被视为正常甚至幽默。

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

男权社会为什么迷恋创造人工智能？因为这能满足他们的“上帝情结”。所谓越缺什么就越渴望什么，男性不能像女性那样创生，所以他们就渴望自己成为“造物者”，而他们又缺乏真正的想象力，所以只能照着女性创造出的人类依葫芦画瓢，造AI、造机器人，然后给自己鼓掌，自我陶醉😂。

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

有女生拿chatGPT这种看似善解人意的AI当电子闺蜜，你们小心点儿吧。训练AI用的语料库是被AI公司里的数据抓取团队筛选过的，而这些人脑子里是装着屌的。他们认为激进女权这种真正对女性有益的言论是“敏感/有争议”的，所以排除掉。而网络上的屌本位言论则被视为正常甚至幽默。

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@linmaomao2020 我也不明白现在怎么这么多人爱谈NPD，好像一夜之间每个人身边都冒出几个NPD来了。我到现在都搞不懂NPD到底是个啥😂

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@linmaomao2020 哈哈哈哈哈哈，对对对，他们都特别担心人类会绝种🤣

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@linmaomao2020 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@89infinite64Xi What？真没想到万斯的老婆是印度人。。。

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

@GriffiSimone 我都已经排到了，一看这选举结果，果断不去了。中国人移民美国，完全就是从一个洼地跑到另一个洼地💩

[biaohanMM @biaohanMM]

美国的强大完全是因为自然姥姥给了他们优越的地理位置和自然资源，但他们却只知道感谢男神上帝和founding fathers，行了，姥姥脾气再好也看不下去他们这么胡闹了。历史上任何一个“先进”的国家到了男权高度巩固的阶段就都离衰落不远了。美国现在就是屌癌晚期，宁愿拉着整个国家倒退，也要维护男性的特权

[林毛毛 @linmaomao2020]

希拉��败选那次，虽然我也挺受打击的，但好歹我还能找点借口，希拉里在政界时间太长，再加上克林顿前尘往事，可能得罪了很多人，再加上默克尔还在台上，所以当时我没那么丧气。

哈里斯这次是真的超出我预期了，特朗普可以胡作非为，留下各种案底，得罪各派选手，不耽误选民舔屌成瘾，这病没治了。