@juanelbarrett Writing with proper grammar and punctuation is simply a habit for me because I am currently writing a thesis. Deflecting the entire scientific debate just to focus on typing styles only shows how thoroughly defeated you are on the actual facts. Keep coping. Goodbye.
@juanelbarrett You can hide behind fallacy definitions all you want, but it won't change the fact that your map is a pseudoscientific fiction rejected by real science. Enjoy living in your echo chamber. Blocked.
@juanelbarrett Pointing out that your source committed scientific fraud, faked data, and lost his academic titles is NOT an "ad hominem" fallacy; it is called evaluating source credibility. If your only evidence comes from a debunked fraudster, your argument has zero validity.
@juanelbarrett Quoting Samuel Beckett after failing to present a single valid scientific fact is the ultimate poetic surrender. You didn't just fail; you got completely exposed. Enjoy your 'better defeat.' Goodbye.
@juanelbarrett I don't need to invent a new research project to debunk your map; the global scientific community already did that and stripped your favorite author of his titles for fraud. Keep crying behind your emojis. We are done here. Total checkmate.
@juanelbarrett You resort to emojis and childish mockery because you ran out of fake data to copy-paste from your racist source. What you call an "excuse" (educational inequality invalidating IQ tests) is literally basic psychometrics taught in week one of psychology.
@juanelbarrett Equating correlation with fixed regional or ethnic intelligence is a textbook ecological fallacy. You are not measuring brain power; you are measuring educational funding and regional GDP. The scientific consensus stands: that map is a fraud. Total checkmate.
@juanelbarrett High correlation between PISA and IQ at the regional level does not prove a genetic intelligence gap. It simply proves that both tests heavily reflect school quality, infrastructure, and socioeconomic wealth. Better schools yield higher scores on both assessments.
@juanelbarrett Consciously defending a scientific fraud that markets school exam results as 'IQ' doesn't make you objective; it just exposes your malicious intent.
@juanelbarrett The fact that you mentioned the PISA method yourself changes nothing; it only proves that you willingly defend this manipulation despite knowing there is no actual IQ test involved.
@juanelbarrett Defending a scholar who was literally stripped of his titles by his own university for scientific fraud isn't objective; it's just desperate pseudoscientific bias. I am done educating you. Total checkmate.
@juanelbarrett You want real research? Read the European Journal of Personality study by Wicherts et al., which systematically evaluated Lynn's datasets and officially declared them methodologically flawed and completely invalid. I gave you a source, now read it.
@juanelbarrett The screenshots you shared literally defeat your own argument. Even the AI states that this data is just "converted 2012 PISA school results," not an actual IQ test, and pulls the text directly from "https://t.co/B7WK3ySDIB" while noting that these maps are "less reliable."
@juanelbarrett This inequality of opportunity and regional income differences is exactly why the scientific community stripped this man of his titles and threw his work into the trash. You are simply holding onto a 19th-century piece of racist manipulation.