Brian Levine

Won Mayoral and County Commissioner races in Somerset, New Jersey as a Republican on my own. CPA- managed billion dollar budgets for corporations.

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

Who is Brian Levine?

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@roman_khaves this is good, who did your video?

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@giyu_codes Did the PI lawyers not pan out?

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@as_farrr @0x0SojalSec What do you think lol

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@MADDurngoValley @ClayTravis @TomiLahren Why would anyone go and vote for the GOP anymore? No voter id, no balanced budget, no term limits , trumps appointments aren’t getting in, no mass deportations, etc. Everything they run on is never done.

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@cbdoane @Redfin I wouldn’t have even noticed they were off if you didn’t point it out. Great technique

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@vpalango @500Indy1911 1. The quality of the broadcast is much better 2. There are no full screen green flag commercials, that in it of itself is worth paying for

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@JTrojjtw @500Indy1911 In what way?

[Sports on Prime @SportsonPrime]

Brad Keselowski breaks down the No. 20's fuel strategy in the final stage at Pocono #NASCARonPrime

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@ThomasE37445146 @Bubblebathgirl its only 7.5 million for the first year which makes the pricing similar to costco

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@Motion_Viz PROMPT

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

@Deerhunter406 @Psyop1776 @DanCrenshawTX I don't think so, otherwise Shawn's lawyer would have rebutted when dan's lawyer said " You were waiting on me to insert special language?" If Shawn's lawyer actually sent the agreement Dan's lawyer wouldn't have responded with that.

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

I thought this originally as well, but unless there are more missing emails Shawn's lawyer never sent them the new waiver to sign and expected Dan's lawyer to make the new agreement instead, which is definitely not standard practice. There's an email where Shawn's lawyer says they are adding a section about the speech and debate clause, and Dan's lawyer replies that he would accept it however Shawn's lawyer never actually sends the new modified agreement. If i wanted sometime to sign a changed agreement I would have to send them the new agreement, I wouldn't expect them to make the agreement and sign it. Does that make sense?

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

I thought this originally as well, but unless there are more missing emails Shawn's lawyer never sent them the new waiver to sign and expected Dan's lawyer to make the new agreement instead, which is definitely not standard practice. There's an email where Shawn's lawyer says they are adding a section about the speech and debate clause, and Dan's lawyer replies that he would accept it however Shawn's lawyer never actually sends the new modified agreement. If i wanted sometime to sign a changed agreement I would have to send them the new agreement, I wouldn't expect them to make the agreement and sign it. Does that make sense?

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

I thought this originally as well, but unless there are more missing emails Shawn's lawyer never sent them the new waiver to sign and expected Dan's lawyer to make the new agreement instead, which is definitely not standard practice. There's an email where Shawn's lawyer says they are adding a section about the speech and debate clause, and Dan's lawyer replies that he would accept it however Shawn's lawyer never actually sends the new modified agreement. If i wanted sometime to sign a changed agreement I would have to send them the new agreement, I wouldn't expect them to make the agreement and sign it. Does that make sense?

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

I thought this originally as well, but unless there are more missing emails Shawn's lawyer never sent them the new waiver to sign and expected Dan's lawyer to make the new agreement instead, which is definitely not standard practice. There's an email where Shawn's lawyer says they are adding a section about the speech and debate clause, and Dan's lawyer replies that he would accept it however Shawn's lawyer never actually sends the new modified agreement. If i wanted sometime to sign a changed agreement I would have to send them the new agreement, I wouldn't expect them to make the agreement and sign it. Does that make sense?

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

I thought this originally as well, but unless there are more missing emails Shawn's lawyer never sent them the new waiver to sign and expected Dan's lawyer to make the new agreement instead, which is definitely not standard practice. If i wanted sometime to sign a changed agreement I would have to send them the new agreement, I wouldn't expect them to make the agreement and sign it. Does that make sense?

[Keith Allen @KAllen4Congress]

DEMOCRATS: Jeffery Epstein HATED Trump!
DEMOCRATS 4 MONTHS AGO: Jeffery Epstein and Trump were best friends, INSEPPERABLE!

Only Democrats will try to convince you a dead person is changing their opinions of people. The shutdown may have finally broken them completely.

[Hans Herberg @HANSFORNJ]

https://t.co/sa6Q7pvvfT

[Brian Levine @BIBwithBrian]

Join Brian Levine, former Republican Mayor and CPA, on this week’s Believe in Better as he dives into a packed agenda. Kicking off with a tribute to George Washington’s precedent-setting leadership, Brian celebrates Presidents' Day with his "Mug of the Week." He then tackles the latest in Middle East politics, exposing the pathology of Hamas and the complexities of the hostage crisis, while breaking down the U.S. economy—GDP growth, lingering inflation pain, and soaring interest rates. Curious about tariffs? Brian explains their impact, from trade wars to consumer costs. He also touches on the DEI rollback in government and corporate America, before unveiling the "Hypocrite of the Week"—New York City Mayor Eric Adams, caught in a controversial deal with the Justice Department. Expect sharp insights, real talk, and a call for better governance in this unmissable episode!