We cannot consider #AI to be morally neutral. In reality, every technical tool embodies choices and priorities through what it measures, ignores, and optimizes, and how it classifies people and situations. Ethical discernment cannot be limited to asking whether we are using a system for good or bad purposes. It must also examine how that system is designed and what vision of the human person and society is embedded in the data and models that guide it. #MagnificaHumanitas
My account is not complicated. I think Christ established the papacy and promised that the church built on him would not fail. Therefore I defend the papacy.
Love me or hate me. And let God be my judge for doing so.
[And if we're keeping score, I was right on Pope Francis]
Pope Leo's views on immigration should be completely non-controversial. He says he is against open borders. Countries have a right to decide who enters. Mass immigration is a problem to be solved. People should stay in their own countries. But that if people do come, they should be treated like human beings with dignity. He also says if they come, they should learn the language and respect the laws.
But because people's brains are broken by American politics they cannot understand this nuance.
The pope clearly said that AI is used by "the few" to advance their agenda. It is not objective.
We agree, your holiness, now tell us who "the few" are. Or did you mean to say, the chosen few?
@Pontifex
Artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships, and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean. Nor do they have a moral conscience, since they do not judge good and evil, grasp the ultimate meaning of situations, or bear responsibility for consequences. They may imitate or even simulate, but they do not understand what they produce, for they lack the affective, relational, and spiritual perspective through which human beings grow in wisdom. #MagnificaHumanitas