Wow... great catch here by @therealmrbench - Carney says he wants to change the "tax structure" to those that can pay for what he wants......... news flash he is coming after those with money in homes, investments, RRSP, nicer cars, second homes, he is coming for you.
Supposedly Carney made Miss Piggy delete this but unfortunately for him this clip will live forever.
Repost and quote and share and make this motherfucker go viral 🤣🤣🤣☠️
🚨🇨🇦 The math of the "Carney Era" is terrifying. 🚩
Federal Deficit: $78 BILLION
Ukraine Aid: $25.5 BILLION
We are effectively borrowing 1/3 of our total deficit to fund a war overseas while 2 million Canadians are hitting food banks and gas is $2.0/L.
This isn’t "leadership"…
it’s a betrayal of the Canadian taxpayer. 🛑🇨🇦
@MarcNixon24@JayGenXer@mario4thenorth@TheBuckYouWill@KirkLubimov@BarbaraBalCPC
#cdnpoli #Ukraine #Aid #Canada
Dear Prime Minister @MarkJCarney,
Congratulations on your triumphant photo-op tour of Beijing. The handshakes were lovely. The smiles were radiant. The press releases were breathless. And the substance, as usual, was thinner than the paper your so-called deals were printed on.
You have just returned from China waving around a bundle of Memorandums of Understanding as if they were signed cheques. They are not. They are IOUs written in disappearing ink. They are polite promises, wrapped in diplomatic ribbon, that Beijing can ignore the moment it becomes inconvenient.
Canadians deserve to know the difference between a real agreement and a glossy brochure. You are hoping they won’t.
Let’s start with your favourite talking point: “China is Canada’s second-largest trading partner.” Technically true. Politically misleading. Morally dishonest.
You repeat that line as if China and the United States are sitting shoulder to shoulder in importance. They are not. We do roughly 77 percent of our trade with America and less than four percent with China. The United Kingdom is practically tied with China for Canadian exports. The European Union as a bloc surpasses China entirely.
But saying “China is our second-largest partner” sounds so much more dramatic at a podium, doesn’t it? It helps justify the narrative that you had no choice but to go cap in hand to Beijing.
The truth is far less flattering: you made a political pilgrimage to an authoritarian regime to trade away Canadian leverage for crumbs.
Let’s talk about those crumbs.
Your big “win” was agreeing to let up to 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles back into Canada at bargain-basement tariffs. This after Canada imposed a 100 percent tariff to protect our own auto sector from subsidized Chinese dumping.
You dressed it up as a clever compromise. You told Canadians this was only “three percent of the market.” You promised this would magically lead to Chinese investment and Canadian jobs.
That is not strategy. That is wishful thinking with a maple leaf sticker on it.
You opened the door first and hoped Beijing would be grateful enough to play nice later. That is not how China operates. It is, however, exactly how naïve Western politicians operate when they are more interested in press releases than long-term national interests.
And what did you get in exchange for weakening Canada’s industrial defenses?
A promise that China might, perhaps, consider lowering tariffs on canola and seafood. Eventually. Maybe by March. Unless they change their minds.
In other words, you traded hard Canadian policy for soft Chinese assurances.
You gave up something real for something hypothetical.
Then there are the parade of MOUs you proudly announced: cooperation on energy, culture, agriculture, “people-to-people ties.” All wonderfully vague. All deliciously unenforceable.
MOUs are not contracts. They are not treaties. They are not commitments. They are diplomatic participation trophies.
You went to Beijing, sat at the grown-ups table, and came home with a stack of autographed napkins.
Meanwhile, Canadians are supposed to forget something inconvenient.
Not long ago you yourself warned that China was our “greatest threat.” You spoke sternly about interference, coercion, and strategic risk. You nodded gravely while security officials raised alarms about espionage, intellectual property theft, and political meddling.
And now? Suddenly China is a “strategic partner.” Suddenly Beijing shares our “net-zero goals.” Suddenly we are to believe that the same regime running coal plants at record levels is Canada’s moral ally in saving the planet.
Your own Natural Resources Minister cheerfully declared that Canada and China share common ground on climate. The rest of the world laughed out loud.
Canadians should not.
There is a profound ethical and security debate here, and you tried to skip it. You treated national security concerns like an awkward guest at a dinner party: best not mentioned while the cameras are rolling.
You spoke of “predictability.” You spoke of “constructive engagement.” You spoke in the soothing language of Davos cocktail hours.
What you did not speak about were red lines.
You did not explain how inviting subsidized Chinese EVs into our market helps Canadian workers.
You did not explain how deeper economic ties with an authoritarian state reduce foreign interference.
You did not explain why Canadians should trust “agreements in principle” with a government that has a long record of tearing up agreements when it suits them.
And you certainly did not explain how any of this protects our most vital relationship: the United States.
At a time when our trade dependence on America is overwhelming, you chose to cozy up to Washington’s biggest strategic rival. Brilliant timing.
Canadians are being asked to take all of this on faith.
But faith is not a trade policy. Optimism is not a national security strategy. And personal ambition is not an economic plan.
The uncomfortable truth is that this mission exposed more than it achieved.
It exposed how easily you confuse press releases with progress.
It exposed how readily you trade long-term interests for short-term applause.
And it exposed a deep, persistent problem in this country: a complacent public that has been trained to accept soothing words instead of hard results.
Canadians are tired, distracted, and far too polite. They assume someone in Ottawa must know what they are doing.
Your China trip proves otherwise.
So here are the questions you owe Canadians clear answers to:
• Where are the legally binding agreements you promised?
• What hard commitments did China make on jobs, investment, and market access?
• What security safeguards were put in place before you opened the EV door?
• How do you justify weakening Canadian industry for “agreements in principle”?
• And most importantly: when did the “greatest threat” magically become a trusted partner?
You can pose for all the photos you like, Prime Minister. You can shake all the hands Beijing offers. You can wrap your decisions in lofty language about cooperation and climate.
But Canadians are not as gullible as you hope.
This was not a bold strategic breakthrough. It was a master demonstration in naïveté dressed up as statesmanship.
And the bill for that naïveté will not be paid by you.
It will be paid by the rest of us.
Sincerely,
A growing number of Canadians who are no longer buying the brochure.
👇🏻
https://t.co/wzbpBX5xUc
Or substack 👇🏻
https://t.co/sbX92JfKxv
#cdnpoli #Canada #China #MarkCarney #Trade
🚨Let’s just map this out ..slowly.
• Chrystia Freeland sits on the World Economic Forum Board of Trustees
• Mark Carney sat on WEF’s governance board until Jan 2025
• Freeland was Deputy PM & Finance Minister under Justin Trudeau
• Carney is now Prime Minister
• Freeland stepped aside in the Liberal leadership race — clearing the lane for Carney
• Carney is the godfather to Freeland’s son
Now the capital side:
• Carney was (is) Chair of Brookfield Asset Management
• Mark Wiseman, a BlackRock executive, is a Carney advisor — and now Canada’s Ambassador to the U.S.
• BlackRock is invested in defense and reconstruction in Ukraine
• Brookfield is invested in Ukrainian energy infrastructure
• BlackRock owns part of Brookfield
And now the finale:
• Freeland is appointed economic advisor to Volodymyr Zelenskyy
Independent actors.
Pure coincidence.
Totally normal governance.
See how it works now?
#cdnpoli #Canada #WEF #FollowTheMoney #ConflictOfInterest #Ukraine #BlackRock #Brookfield
@MarcNixon24@cbcwatcher@WhineNot
Senator Kennedy finally says it out loud on Mark Carney.
If Carney actually wanted Canada to win, he’d:
➡️ Drop ALL U.S. tariffs to ZERO
➡️ Demand Trump do the same
That’s how you get prosperity. 📈
But Carney doesn’t want prosperity.
He wants a TRADE WAR ⚔️
Because trade wars mean leverage.
And leverage means power.
This isn’t about protecting Canada 🇨🇦
It’s about control 🧵
Prosperity makes people independent.
Conflict makes them manageable.
Read that again. 🙄
#TradeWar #CanadaUS #cdnpoli
@xtremeleafan@MichaelCooperMP Then the coward should have no problem showing up to defend himself in parliament or have Brookfield CEO’s take the stand and clear his name
Cloned meat enters Canada’s food supply without any labeling or a safety review
It’s time to hit up your local butcher or farmer
I refuse to eat cloned meat regardless of what Health Canada says about it being safe
WELCOME TO CHINADA 🇨🇦
Where everything that’s happening is connected and done on purpose:
The BC Ostrich Farm Cull.
The land grab in Richmond, BC
Carney not making a deal with the US.
The Liberals trying to steal a majority without an election.
Censorship Bills C-2, C-8, C-9, C-63 about to pass without opposition.
Health Canada quietly lifting their bans on cloned meat and soon to be sold without a label.
Wherever you look, our government is attacking us: going after our farmers, our freedom of speech, our economy, our income, our food supply and soon our ability to travel…
What’s next? Universal Basic Income, Digital IDs and 15-minute cities.
Canadians need the wake up and understand that we are being PLAYED! These are not LEFT vs RIGHT issues but TOP vs BOTTOM.
How much will Carney’s budget cost you?
What’s the difference between debt, deficits and operational vs capital spending?
FINALLY! A video that explains it all.
This is Kyle.
One month ago he was a son, a father, a brother — a man with a future.
Today, he’s gone.
The Liberal government calls it compassion.
They call it safe supply.
But this is what happens when we fund addiction instead of recovery.
This is not compassion — this is Canada’s self-harm policy. THIS IS TORONTO.
Full video coming soon
https://t.co/E19E1iaVX3
@oliviachow@fordnation@somerspsych@Cunnington50818@VancityNews1
#PSA #AddictionCrisis #SafeSupply #Canada #OpioidCrisis #RecoveryNotRuin #DrewCouver56 #VoicesFromTheCurb
As a former banker and self proclaimed economic expert, Carney sure is getting the basics wrong.
When the government spends, it’s still spending even if he calls it “investing.”
Saying the two are different means he either doesn’t know what he’s talking about, or worse, he’s trying to trick Canadians.