@JohnMassingale4@stmcgee Why should IU take the chance of injury due to more starter reps/loss when you have a top 20 SOS every year without an additional P4 opponent?
Navy also finished lower in FPI and Sagarin than both ODU and North Texas last year.
@JohnMassingale4@stmcgee Kennesaw was CUSA champs, WKU lost to LSU by 3, North Texas was ranked last year. IU SOS has been and will continue to be stronger perpetually.
“best service academy” vs the big ten schedule is not a comparison unless you are comparing them to Purdue or northwestern
@JohnMassingale4@stmcgee Right. And IU plays in the toughest conference in football while Notre dame plays in the weakest power conference as well as service academies and Rice. Our schedule is still ranked top 25 SOS compared to Notre Dame in mid 50-60s range with an additional P4 game
@HorsemenPod@Indiana_Fight IU doesn’t need any non con competition, ND does. A loss to ND does a lot more damage than a win would do good. This is bad for ND however
@SCI_Borg24@DrMakaryFDA@US_FDA Every sponsor is different tbh. Many have brought roles back in house post covid because CROs underperform and have high turnover. It really is probably case by case by sponsor/trial, but I would think the majority of the CRO contracts would be unaffected here sans data analysis
@SCI_Borg24@DrMakaryFDA@US_FDA The FDA doesn’t close data queries- they are still completed by the CRA which is usually a CRO. The FDA isn’t going to clean clinical trial data itself, the sponsor will still have to provide a data package for submission which will still be CROs. This might replace DSMBs