[email protected]

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@Wasteofskin2 @speakingkills @ESPNFC Ah yes, anyone who has normal views and doesn’t hate women for no reason is a simp. Typical internet incel behavior

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@mjkundayi @LeoAndreXavi @Vaishna62568170 @thefootyarena This is such a stupid argument. Portugal have got dramatically better in the 21st century even without Ronaldo, as have many European countries. How hard it is to win a trophy doesn’t depend on how many trophies your country won 30 years ago, it depends on who you have now

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@mjkundayi @derraahh @Natty_B175 @EverythingCR7_ Do you know why players like Maradona were so highly lauded, over players like Gerd Muller? Hint, it wasn’t their goalscoring. Watch football and use your brain

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@cutdemonions @AleMartnezR1 @Vote4Equality20 @zone_astronomy What does this even mean

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@Robbservations @OtangeloG @GodlessLiz That isn’t evidence against God, that is evidence against the Gods of established religions. It doesn’t rule out the possibility that a being that could be God exists. That’s why this argument is silly, we can call the universe itself God if we want.

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@Robbservations @OtangeloG @GodlessLiz There is no evidence that there is no god either. Atheism is about recognizing that their is no evidence for God, so belief in God is futile. God may or may not exist, it is impossible to know, and it is impossible to determine what form it is in.

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@Robbservations @OtangeloG @GodlessLiz To be honest don’t bother. People like him just don’t understand logic

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@OtangeloG @Robbservations @GodlessLiz Atheism is not an ideology, so it cannot be wrong in that sense. It simply does not acknowledge the existence of a higher being because there is no evidence

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@OtangeloG @Robbservations @GodlessLiz You have a very great misunderstanding of what’s going on here. The burden of proof is upon you

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@OtangeloG @Robbservations @GodlessLiz That isn’t the point. Just because your God is the only plausible explanation (it isn’t) doesn’t mean it is the right one. There is no evidence for God, so there is no rational reason to accept God.

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@AleMartnezR1 @Vote4Equality20 @zone_astronomy No it isn’t. Humans developed most of the things you describe due to the agricultural revolution, having more time to ponder over things like that. The agricultural revolution was only possible (in part) due to our ability to use tools, which dolphins cant.

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@SH35dv5e7 @rln99_LFC @footballtweet When was the era of super stars? Both Peps Barca and Zidanes Real were incredibly free flowing and well worked teams. Messi and Ronaldo were crucial parts of the teams, just as Lewa is for Bayern and Salah is for Liverpool

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@poenicusium @xajkkcs @FabrizioRomano @TNTSportsBR It’s not every players dream club, it’s many players dream club. Obviously, there are a lot of great players (like Messi) who prefer Barca. Real appeals to more people though, I agree

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@BarcaaRen Again, you aren’t understanding. He brought in so much revenue that his wages were a pittance in comparison. Losing him will hurt the club financially.

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@BarcaaRen He literally wasn’t part of it. They couldn’t have resigned him if he played for free, and he brought in literally 1/3 of their revenue. Even at his most expensive he brought in much more revenue than he got in wages.

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@nhdnsjssjsjdh @Caution_10_ @itskawhi @cr7raprhymes This is such bullshit logic. You don’t judge playmakers by their pass efficiency, because they (by nature) need to be risky. Messi takes way more risky attempts at passes, because that’s his job. You’d think if Ronaldo was such an incredibly playmaker teams would use that

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@theKloppEnd_ idk man, Brighton is not as small of a club as our previous opponents

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@shane1keough @RobLo_Xero @DaxOMillion @BDaroowala @KUrquiaga Cry

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@2001Icey @Lionel30ii Eh? Messi is quite clutch, he has won more points this year than anyone with his goals. Ronaldo is almost narcissistic when it comes to confidence, sure, but I’m not entirely sure that translates much on the pitch. Ex: Messi has 3 less match winners in UCL in way less matches

[[email protected] @billjames1685]

@breathMessi21 Nah. Messi>>Ronaldo, but Haaland>Mbappe imo. Mbappe can just be stopped too easily, literally just don’t give him space and he has nothing to contribute. And Messi is more than just a “creator”, he is a genuine playmaker who plays deep unlike Mbappe