@dinolloyd@AlanDBeesley@amaBhungane I can give some understanding to the 'your party's comment, because in fairness, there are so many bots in political chats. I'll see if he responds to the co-ask, but totally agree that political parties as a whole are not to be trusted.
@dinolloyd@AlanDBeesley@amaBhungane Co-ask. I'm at a loss for what the issue actually is, and would really like to understand as ActionSA is high on my list of parties to vote for
@_ThePugFather@MYANC are able to recover where our neighbours were too far gone. We are now them. Just a better off them for now. Same as them, if we don't change course, it will keep getting worse. 2/2
@GarethCliff I agree completely that consensus is dangerous. I also agree that it is harmful to the whole. I must add however that this argument shows that the whole is not viable as a concept. If you move away from consensus, you get dictatorship. In either scenario the decisions are 1/2
@YourDevillette@JPdebeer1981 Reality is the prices mirror what people will pay. They still made money. So question becomes what is the real break point? Not just the complaints around it. People incorrectly assume there is a consideration of the 'whole'. Business, driven byy people, care about the business.
@LibertyCappy This is exactly what people need to do! Respect the neighbours take on shit, and let life play out. The community groups would be sooooo much quieter, and so many people would be happier. Each to their own.
@mommy_moneyza@JohannBiermann1 Provided by market, not gvmt. That I would agree with. Would have to agree to disagree if the expectation is for gvmt to have authority or control over provision.
@mommy_moneyza@JohannBiermann1 As the supply reduces, and the prices of property go up, it will become cheaper to build and the market swings slowly across. Irrelevant of the government.