@DmitryKovalchuk It was not bad. It performed exactly as expected (minus something wonky in LATM). Prosera also gave more confidence for ILD and connective tissue disease.
@trentkelp@Archimedes20311@avidresearch I’m an industry guy but it doesn’t take a genius to understand pos is very favorable. Anything can happen of course but the facts there. Anything else is speculation.
@Buffalo51766917@avidresearch They literally enrolled Prosera based on a subgroup from Torrey and you’re using stats from all patients in Torrey….your IQ is showing. It’s not difficult to understand. Of course they’re not using median here since majority of pts in Torrey we’re not Fc III
@Archimedes20311@avidresearch What’s a fail to you? Because the likely hood of being stat sig at the very least is super high and that’s all that’s needed to go up from this level.
@Vulpescap There isn’t a direct linear relationship between 6mwd and clinical outcome/physical activity. I don’t blame people for questioning this but it’s just not clinically meaningful and I hate that binary outcome depends on this. This is why clinical community doesn’t mirror investors
@DavidCastillo99@singhlosophy They will definitely get above 25m overall (75% FC III patients) and over 30m in that subset. I agree it works better over time but they will hit the 6mwd. Nearsighted people will try to compare it to Soratercept and that is just not a comparison.
@_financeken@Biotenic You fell for the hit pieces. Seralutinib is nothing like Imatinib or Sot or Aerovate. In fact, PAH isn’t even the ideal indication and 24 weeks is peanuts to see the real benefit. I’m not saying which way SP will go in the next couple weeks, but the market is wrong on this one.