@Kekius_Sage What do you mean by science tho? The scientific establishment (a clique of sorts) or the methodic pursuit of Truth? If you mean the latter, hell yeah. Truth champions everything else.
The problem is not misunderstanding, but straight-up corruption in cases 1-3. Number 4 might indeed be a misunderstanding about what protecting a minority entails (spoiler: it shouldn't entail affecting others negatively). Number 5 needs way more non-partisan scientific research before being given a green light, since it's irreversible.
@porqueTTarg La calidad de vida de la persona es importante. Yo haría lo mismo. Me parece que la gente que no apoya esto tiene creencias raras (religiosas, moralidad ingenua, etc.). Por lo demás, que importa lo que piense la gente, no es su problema (literalmente).
@topkekius Los seres humanos somos fragmentados. Probablemente algunas cosas en ellos sean iguales, como el miedo a la soledad o la ambición por el estatus social. Otras no, como las capas de complejidad que su cerebro es capaz de vislumbrar, y otras cosas.
@alpaysh Maybe we are just assuming that we all understand the same for 'introspection'. I understand it as impartially seeing our animal drives, which is positive because I learn what I am actually dealing with, both in me and with others (we are all not that different).
A first cause is an impossibility if you think about it (classic turtles all the way down).
Maybe the infinite is real, and our conceptual mind simply can’t grasp it, because it wasn’t designed to.
Our attempts to understand higher realities with lower faculties might look something like this: https://t.co/NKSMg0PTwH
Some traditions suggest we also have access to a non-conceptual mind that operates in mental silence. The intelligence that brought about everything we know might have a better way to work that the linking of mere picture-frames (thoughts).