@msteevie3d@Blender@lichtfeldstudio And I worked.on product viewers for a few years. Dynamic splats have great potential. Just need a better way to capture high frequency detail...
@ChrisUKSharp Words are important here. People, especially people at that level, phrase things very specifically. Grusch testified to biologics and that has quite a wide scope.
@ChrisUKSharp@DarkstarIE I respect Ross and have followed a huge amount of his work over the years. But after a while, claims without evidence start becoming ipse dixit and appeals to authority. If disclosure is real, it’ll almost certainly be selective and shaped around institutional agendas.
@ChrisUKSharp@DarkstarIE We’ve now reached the stage where vague references to “pastors” are being treated as evidence. Are we talking about the Vatican here? Because it’s hard to imagine Rubio or Vance having serious UAP discussions with Vatican officials given the recent friction over the Iran war.
@oxcrowx Seems like X is a poor place to have language discussions of any depth. Instead we're resorting to trolling each other. Maybe do a video and walk through your issues one by one and then people can respond to them.
@TheGingerBill@oxcrowx For the record I like Odin and I love the discussion around language design but there is no need to disparage the person. Just tackle the argument on its merits.
@TheProjectUnity Who knows? Without the metadata from the camera and without expert testimony to support it, a lot of these images are meaningless and will further muddy the water
@ChrisUKSharp I'm sorry but with the extensive redaction and without expert interpretation of this it's really hard to know what the hell is going on in any of these images or videos. This feels like misdirection and we're amplifying it here.
@digijordan If all of this is true, the fact that they might have given this technology to corporations for their own profit pales in comparison to the impact of not revealing this to the human race because it's prevented us from becoming better than what we are. That's the crime.
@TheProjectUnity If this is true, then physics did not merely take a wrong turn 70 years ago. It means some of our most celebrated scientists were misled, and generations of theory were built like sandcastles on a manufactured beach...
@michaelshermer This is a cartoon argument. It doesn't have to be a fraud or a total collapse of physics. Science is approximate anyway. We're always refining the models, and people can be honest, wrong, or describing something not yet understood.