@GRROWLS Long as ur attacking pedos, zoos, and racists!
Some people attack people for drawing pokemon nsfw and short characters tho. And THAT is toxic. Gives us a bad name. 😔
@HaveYouMetTomu Idk man. I think it depends on how popular the person is and if their notifs are getting flooded. I feel like fanart shouldn't be made with the sole expectation of getting a retweet. 70k on Twitter would be a hell of an inbox...
@BetaEtaDelota Twitter guilt tripped you out of going. There are plenty of precautions that can keep things safe. It wouldn't be running if there wasn't.
@FurFoxSakeSuits Long as they are transparent about it. Lots of places consider removal of massive facial tumors "Cosmetic" so...
But if you meant like... a nosejob, bit odd. But as long as they are transparent about it so people know what they are donating to.
@FurFoxSakeSuits Depends. If its just someone's sparkeldog sonas its totally fine. Especially when art styles are so abstracted that they dont really look like actual real stinky animals lol. Mythical creatures like Pokemon and dragons are fine too
Treating people like criminals for art isnt ok
@RivaloWolf@dumpstercryptid Thank god someone is agreeing with this. OP blocked me 🙄. Ive been scammed out of thousands by various artists who never intended to scam me... but did none the less. That kind of behaviour destroys consumers trust in artists. Its sad to see it encouraged.
@dumpstercryptid Its not reasonable to expect people to just forget about commissioned work they never received. Customers have every right to chargeback if they believe they are unlikely to get what they paid for. And if its a repeated issue an artist has, callouts are reasonable.
@theartfight This feels very... conservative. 😟
Hopefully this is actually about ILLEGAL content. And not someone drew fictional size diference ships yall find yucky.