Alan trying to be Sara’s defense counsel, indirectly. Because why would you imply that it was self-defense? And why are you asking the witness about Sara’s state of mind when the witness wasn’t able to talk to Sara?
Galingan mo naman, Alan. Taga Ateneo Law ka sabi mo, diba?
this is why i stan @vicegandako, napaka-maalam niya sa mga social issues.
context: she asked if sino daw kumanta ng ‘beauty and a beat’, someone answered na si justin and nicki, when she heard nicki, she said “ay.. MAGA.”
they could never make me hate u meme!
#ShowtimeEpekYan
Friendly reminder that last time Zuleika Lopez was questioned in Congress, she was DETAINED because she tried to stop the VP from being held accountable for the missing ₱612 million.
See you next week at the impeachment court, girl.
'MOTU PROPRIO' O 'DIRECTED INVESTIGATION?'
Naging sentro ng cross-examination ng depensa ang legal na batayan ng imbestigasyon ng National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), kabilang ang kahulugan ng mga terminong "motu proprio" at "directed investigation" na binanggit ng unang testigo ng prosekusyon.
Nagkaroon naman ng sunod-sunod na pagtutol ang House prosecution panel sa ilang tanong ni defense counsel Atty. Carlo Narvasa, dahil umano sa pagiging "argumentative" ng mga ito.
WATCH: #VPSaraOnTrial
https://t.co/fR01mmSyo8
atty ligutan: objection, your honor. objection.
atty narvasa: sir... your honor, i'm not yet finished
ANG TAWA KO SA REACTION NI ATTY LIGUTAN AHHAHAHAHAHA
⚠️ The Final Word Tonight:
Kung hindi dahil kay Princess Maui na nagtanong kay BP Sara at kay Harry Roque na inupload ang Zoom livestream sa FB nya eh hindi magkaka ebidensya to impeach her for grave threats.
Kasalanan ng mga DDS! 😂
#ConvictSara
Sen #RisaHontiveros can ask clarificatory questions as senator-judge. Judges do this to resolve ambiguities of a witness' testimony or assess the credibility of a witness.
Problema kasi ni Pia, mas maganda si Risa.
#RisaNa
The Narvasa lawyers of Sara Duterte are the son and grandson of former chief justice Andres Narvasa who was the defense attorney of Erap in his impeachment trial.
25 years later, the Narvasas are still on the wrong side of history.
Atty. CJ Narvasa looked at the Defense Panel and seemed like he got approval.
He smiled smugly back looking like he got the job done.
His job seems to be is to be pedantic – to always object and prevent evidence.
He thought he ate but the Court of Public Opinion will be harsh.
Habang nagsasalita si brader, si sisteraka nag-iisip na ng kanyang eksena. Nakakatakot ang hitsura ni Pia. Almost motionless, but look at the movement of the eyes. Parang may nagbabadyang ubos sa dako pa roon.