BitcoinErrorLog

Building the Atomic Economy at @synonym_to.

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

You know how they tried to kill torrents and totally failed?

Imagine if we built everything that way.

That's what we do at @Synonym_to.

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

The reason you cannot have nice things is government regulations.

We work hard to make innovative tech that empowers the public, but whenever we want to legitimately launch a product, we have to choose whether to cripple it, or, become an arm of the state.

It is depressing and chilling.

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@_Albert_Frei_ 3 launches this weekend, plus some future plans around intent coordination, p2p credit, and local indexing.

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

We have achieved one-tap checkout internally.

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@Laurett_77 This weekend

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@_Albert_Frei_ Where we're going, we won't need to convince them...

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@adam3us @Strategy @saylor What is this usage of "credit" how is it a credit product?

[Bitkit @bitkitwallet]

Going to Lugano?

You don't want to miss this workshop at @LuganoPlanB
By @_benkaufman and Denys Zalisky

[Bitkit @bitkitwallet]

Agents need money?

@Synonym_to developer @_benkaufman joins @roy_breez, @MoritzKaminski and @roasbeef at @LuganoPlanB to debate how AI agents should pay and what that means for Bitcoin.

Come hear their hot takes at @LuganoPlanB this week

[ﾁｬｰﾘｰ･背楠ﾄﾝ｡ @charizon]

@m6info 彼のフランス語を文字起こしし、AIで英語・日本語に翻訳し画像化しました。よければ読んでください。

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

My old dating app profile was short, it just said:
"Looking for a woman that knows what she wants for dinner."

My wife later told me she thought it was a joke.

[Thorne 🌸 @ExistentialEnso]

You Can Eat Anything

(by tommcgovern27 on IG)

[PsyopAnime @PsyopAnime]

Lend me your energy!

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@LashaAntadze No, I replied to the Bitcoin response too

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@LashaAntadze How did you manage to memory hole my reply by deleting your other reply?

My response is gone, but I assume you saw it.

[Matt @superintoit]

@JohnDoyle Kamehameha Kyle

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@deanwball It is good. This is human progress that must be freed.

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@DiogoLobo It's what Bitcoin needs.

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

GM

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@21mbitcoins If it goes this way it would start dropping by Nov, and bottom in Dec/Jan

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

@SteveSimple Because Saif sold out from the beginning. The book is investor cope porn.

[BitcoinErrorLog @BitcoinErrorLog]

If the assumed topic is scale, along with an assumed goal of adoption, then you have about 3 options:

1. Bitcoin is only ever used by about 10M people, everyone else uses credit
2. More blockchains
3. Bigger blocks

The practical choice, and the one the market has expressed since the beginning, is already (2), but there is some movement toward (1).

Bigger blocks aren't really communism because everyone actually does have to bear the same costs, and bitcoin is exclusive by costs. As a solution it has a limit that interplays with the fees to make a transaction, and the speed of internet. At some size, it still becomes too expensive for low-tier users, whether by hardware costs, or tx fee costs, or, too slow to keep the network in sync.

The real issue is Ponzi Bitcoiners unwilling to own that title. If they did, then an irrational desire to get everyone on one blockchain would be logically consistent.

In the end, raising block sizes modestly can increase the number of people that can use the original Bitcoin, but it isn't really enough to get us to billions of users, and it is an odd assumption that everyone would use one coin anyway.