We are Bitcoiners who still believe Bitcoin is money.
Not a JPEG gallery.
Not cheap cloud storage.
Not a data layer for arbitrary spam.
For too long, non-monetary data has bloated the UTXO set, raised verification costs, and threatened the decentralization that keeps Bitcoin sovereign.
BIP-110 is our temporary, pragmatic line in the sand — a soft fork that limits abuse of blockspace and refocuses the chain on its original purpose: peer-to-peer electronic cash.
We run Knots.
We signal BIP-110.
We filter what doesn’t belong.
This is not about control.
It’s about preserving a sound monetary network that anyone can run and verify — without permission, and without carrying everyone else’s junk.
The network is waking up. More sovereign nodes choose this path every week.
Filters up. 🛡️
#BIP110 #RunKnots #Bitcoin
🇵🇹 PORTUGAL: 0% CAPITAL GAINS TAX ON BITCOIN IF YOU HOLD FOR 1 YEAR.
HOLD BTC FOR 365+ DAYS AS A PORTUGUESE TAX RESIDENT AND PAY ZERO TAX ON YOUR GAINS.
ONE OF THE MOST CRYPTO-FRIENDLY TAX REGIMES IN EUROPE.
Children of the UK!
Follow these steps and you won't have to care about what any w**ker politician thinks you should do ever again.
Refuse to go to school
Learn how to use a VPN
Set up a Nostr profile
Learn how to use Bitcoin and start accepting it
Do this and you'll be fine.
POLAND REJECTS MiCA FOR THE THIRD TIME
🇵🇱 Polish President Karol Nawrocki has vetoed a bill regulating Bitcoin & crypto for the third time, arguing it would place excessive burdens on the industry.
The bill would implement the EU’s MiCA rules and create a licensing regime for crypto firms.
Poland now faces uncertainty ahead of the EU’s July 1 MiCA deadline, as the country still lacks a fully operational licensing framework for crypto companies.
This is what we need!!! I have been telling White Men to fight back for ages and now FINALLY something is happening, i hope this goes viral, because this video needs to be seen by every single fighting masculine White Men! 🔥💪🏼
sign-in with ethereum is actually a terrible idea because it trains people to sign messages all the time & creates _signing fatigue_. what you actually want is the exact opposite. a sig should be considered _dangerous_ and treated as a _special event_. it should not be something users do casually as part of their normal workflow. if people get used to clicking "sign" everywhere, they stop paying attention & eventually sign things they do not understand (this happens every minute in this space btw). the right security model is to teach users that signing something is a _serious action_ that deserves a lot of scrutiny, and not to normalise it as just another login button. we should immediately stop doing this shit.
great seeing the @Kleros_io forum just started using our new Sign in with Ethereum (@signinethereum) Discourse plugin for their forum! 👏👏👏
every crypto discourse forum should have SIWE as an option
learn how to add it to your discourse forum (whether crypto related or not) here: https://t.co/JWlE7yN5jZ
JUST IN: MASTERCARD JUST ANNOUNCED THAT THEY WILL ENABLE AI AGENTS TO TRANSACT USING #BITCOIN AND CRYPTO
AI WILL STORE VALUE IN BTC
THE FUTURE IS HERE 🔥
There's only 4.6% of #Bitcoin left to be mined.
In 2 years, it will be just 3.1%.
At this point, new supply issuance will be cut in half permanently.
People are currently focused on when the bear market is over (is it now? in 3 months?)...
but the supply shortage that will fuel the next bull market is already loading.
This is the heart of Bitcoin's game theoretic inevitability.
Bitcoin has increasing scarcity of new supply issuance... terminating in absolute scarcity.
Both of these properties are a first in the world of store-of-value assets (because a set-in-stone supply schedule is not possible in the physical world - only in the digital world).
And yet, 99.9% of the world does not realize these simple truths, and as a result has not yet adopted Bitcoin as their primary savings technology / treasury asset.
They will have to bid for the meager 4.6% of new supply left, or try to buy existing coins from the 0.1% who already understand what Bitcoin is.
All you have to do is remember what you're holding, accumulate if you can, and wait for economic reality to continue to play out.
When the 99.9% come bidding for your coins, at what price will you sell them some?
One of the coolest things about @ensdomains is that an ENS name doesn't have to point to the same address forever.
With Cloaked, you can link your ENS name and have it resolve to a fresh, unlinkable address every time it's used.
Human-readable names + practical privacy
Quick demo:
THIS IS HUGE FOR BITCOIN
Someone just bought a $4.2 million home using Bitcoin as collateral... without selling any Bitcoin. And it was backed by Fannie Mae.
While the timeline obsesses over short-term price action, Bitcoin is quietly moving from “store of value” into real collateral inside the $50 trillion US housing market.
An introduction to @vizorwallet for Desktop!
It is the latest Zcash wallet to support Multiple Accounts, @KeystoneWallet Hardware Storage & Private Coin Voting 🗳️
View all Zcash wallets + features:
https://t.co/Ge0vcIMjxM
Elon Musk just exposed the EU’s biggest lie.
Ursula von der Leyen was lecturing about “democracy” when Musk hit her with the truth:
“If democracy is the foundation of freedom, surely your position as leader of the EU should be elected directly by the people?”
The EU is run by unelected bureaucrats who impose mass migration, net zero madness and speech controls on 450 million people — with zero accountability.
This isn’t democracy. It’s a dictatorship in slow motion.
The people are waking up. The EU’s days are numbered.
The financial-industrial complex now has a wonderful financialization tool in $MSTR for manipulating Bitcoin’s short-term price.
To combat that, you need your own long-term strategy.
$MSTR sold 32 BTC at $77,000 & later acquired 1,550 BTC at $65,000 after the correction.
It is what it is.
If you’re focused on the short-term price, you’re playing their game.
If you’re focused on long-term self-custody and accumulation, you’re playing your own.
This is the most rigorous Bitcoin paper
I've read. I've been studying —
and testing — it for 20 days.
https://t.co/mCfJQpJTbE
Dr. Santostasi and Dr. Perrenod gave us the ruler —
and the imagination to see the oscillator.
Together: the most falsifiable framework
in crypto economics.
The Power Law isn't just a model —
it's the most precise ruler we have
for measuring where Bitcoin stands.
Most models describe the past.
The Power Law keeps passing tests
it was never designed for.
"Isn't β=5.69 just curve-fitting?"
Fair question.
So I ran a test the paper didn't.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Materials & Methods
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Data: Daily closing price and non-zero balance
address count (BitcoinMagazinePro,
2010-08-17 to 2026-06-04, n=5,771).
Model: log₁₀P(t) = log₁₀A + β·log₁₀(t)
where t = days since Genesis Block (2009-01-03).
Out-of-sample design:
The power law was fitted exclusively on data
up to the freeze date, with zero observations
from the test period used in estimation.
Two freeze points were tested:
① Freeze at 2016-07-08 (2nd halving)
Training: n=2,153 | Test: n=3,617 (10 years)
② Freeze at 2020-05-10 (3rd halving)
Training: n=3,555 | Test: n=2,215 (6 years)
Residuals computed as:
ε = log₁₀(P_observed / P_predicted)
normalized by in-sample σ.
Mean residual and area integrals
(trapezoidal rule) applied to test period only.
The out-of-sample test was my idea.
Computation and analysis executed with
Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic).
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Froze the power law using data up to 2016 only (β=5.717).
Then measured the following 10 years it had never seen.
Result: mean residual −0.05σ. Effectively zero.
Frozen at 2020 instead → next 6 years, −0.13σ.
Same story.
The line drawn in 2016 ran straight through the next decade.
That's not fitting. That's forecasting.
The Power Law: powerful because it can be broken —
and hasn't been.
Knowing where we are won't tell us when things will happen — but it tells us exactly what to do now.
Buy Bitcoin Now.
@Giovann35084111@moneyordebt@ScientificBTC@saylor@natbrunell
#Bitcoin #PowerLaw
I started running a Bitcoin Core node in late 2024. In February 2025, before I was aware of the spam debate and just a couple of months before it really took off on X, I switched to @BitcoinKnots.
At the time Knots was about 2% of the network. I was concerned about the concentration of Core nodes so I was looking for another option. After reading about Knots and @LukeDashjr it seemed like a right choice.
My node verifies the transactions for my family of bitcoiners and controls 20 PH/s of hashrate which is signaling for BIP110.
I'm one of the thousands of bitcoiners who doesn't want @bitcoincoreorg the final say over protocol development because I consider their actions over the last few years to be detrimental to #Bitcoin.