@zndtoshi The falsehood in your statement is implicating BIP110 adds new features like segwit and taproot did.
It does not.
It restricts.
Which makes its activation more closer to original Bitcoin pre-segwit and pre-taproot.
Any code written in this form is an attempt to hack the system:
If 1=1, do this
If 1=0, do that
1 is never equal to 0. There’s no reason to have it. Any coder doing this is trying to hack.
I’m investigating all OP_IF usages in taproot to see what percent was to hack.
You will soon see the large bitcoin accounts that have stayed quiet about BIP-110 starting to see that it could win. Remember those who fought while no one cared.
BIP110 is a simple statement: "we reject Core 30’s proposed addition of data storage to bitcoin."
Bitcoin is money. That is the starting point. If we lose sight of that, we lose the plot.
I’m tired of your insults.
I am providing investigative journalism, everything is sourced with screenshots and URLs. I’m doing it because I care about Bitcoin.
You sit there arrogantly handwaving honest concerns, throwing insults and ad hominems towards people uncovering extremely alarming behavior and governance by Bitcoin’s reference implementation, while being invested in all kinds of grifts, while not even commenting on fucked up emails connecting you to Epstein’s island.
You have fallen completely, Adam. Just sad to see. Now fuck off.
Some "Bitcoin experts" out there moving like a small crew of salty old-timers — personally hunting plebs who support BIP-110 just to own the narrative.
Offended that the community is proving them wrong on spam incentives, node costs & L1 purity.
Numbers drying up? Focus shifts from educating to farming followers.
Values optional.
We run Knots + DATUM + Ocean. Stay sovereign. 🧂⚡
I think we can firmly put the illusion to bed that the average «bitcoiner» values the don’t trust, verify mantra, when they are perfectly fine with people hanging out with Epstein on his island. And at the same time up in arms against preventing spam.
Bitcoiners in name only.
After BIP-110 activates in August, nodes will reject blocks that miners use to embed spam data. Miners will have only two choices: comply with the consensus rules or waste their computational power producing worthless spam blocks that have no value to the network.
Back in the day of early Bitcoin Twitter, we used to say "few," which was short for "few understand."
Nowadays, Bitcoin Twitter is a different beast.
First, it's not even Bitcoin Twitter anymore - it's Bitcoin X.
Second, many of the most prominent few migrated to Nostr - The Internet's most beautiful clusterfuck.
Many of the few of the few that remained did what many of the few had done before them - they sneakily became shitcoiners, because they simply didn't have the multiple-decade-spanning patience required for Bitcoin's don't-get-poor-slowly mechanism to play out properly.
Out of the few of the few of the few that were left, many didn't acknowledge the shitconers' most devious attack yet - the shitcoins on Bitcoin.
Many of the few of the few of the few even thought of the shitcoiners coming to Bitcoin as a good thing!
"As long as they pay the fees, it's all dandy, man! Everything is good for Bitcoin!"
But then there's the few of the few of the few of the few. Those who choose to do something about it and aren't afraid to admit it.
These are the people I'm here to interact with. They are the reason I fell in love with this community in the first place.
However, because of the fact that the few of the few of the few of the few aren't that numerous, many of the many think we will fail.
What they miss is that most of us didn't even care for social media in the first place.
That is why we'll win.
Few.