Bitcoin Education

Bitcoin education for developers.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

📣 New class in our #Bitcoin Developer Course! Learn to build your own Bitcoin wallet with Bitcoin Core V26. Coming soon: descriptor wallets. Join us and Get @Skillshare free for 1 month! 👉 https://t.co/brMec2Ocn4

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@FreeSpeechBTC21 He just lost a competitor for his jade wallet, the psycho must be happy for this. The bitcoiners who lost their money? Who cares!

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@GrassFedBitcoin @COLDCARDwallet Some of these clowns bashed Luke when he was stolen.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@0x6aApp @masunobom A retard creating a new spam method that no one uses is harmless. One has to spend money to make it popular enough. Will he spend time and resources only for it to be rendered worthless in the next soft fork? BIP110 is just the first step in the defense against spam.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@kinetic_finance It makes total sense. A 1 year expiration time will make another soft fork necessary. The new soft fork will ban the new spam methods that get popular.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@BSVPortugal Ok, a lot of shitcoiners and coretards agreeing, and against my opinion. It's an excelent heuristic showing my point is correct.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@BSVPortugal Ok, a lot of shitcoiners and coretards agreeing, and against my opinion. It's an excelent heuristic showing my point is correct.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@aeonBTC @mike_4131 I dont think bip110 is a sybil attack, but let's consider it is. The wipeout risk still exists, and the correct way to deal with it is by a URSF.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@mike_4131 @aeonBTC No, not worrying about a proposal from a retard like you, of course. But ignoring a proposal with 20% of the nodes, that's a completely different story.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@aeonBTC @mike_4131 It has consensus because there are no implementations that actively rejects it. Your node is completely at the mercy of miners not pointing their hashrate to bip110 and wiping the version you "support". If your version of governance tolerates this risk, then it's broken.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@mike_4131 @aeonBTC Wtf you're talking about. This is not only about spam anymore. It's about broken governance. If this bip, which has consensus and no oposition, doesnt pass, it means miners control the network, not nodes. It means bitcoin is just another shitcoin.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@betirement @The_Kazar Naive from you thinking only decreasing the op_return would suffice to fight spam. Every new spam method that becomes popular should be destroyed every now and then. Yes, it's an infinite cat and mouse game. Refusing to play it, as core wants, would guarantee bitcoin death.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@mike_4131 @aeonBTC No, there's no alternative nor a viable hard forked coin. Either this bip passes or crypto is broken for good.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@saylor You're knot thinking straight. What about this: the clarity act is postponed to 2030 the same day bip110 activates. Big miners collude to signal bip110, causing a massive reorg and rollbacking transactions. What would be the btc price if that happens?

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@saylor You're knot thinking straight. What about this: the clarity act is postponed to 2030 the same day bip110 activates. Big miners collude to signal bip110, causing a massive reorg and rollbacking transactions. What would be the btc price if that happens?

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@CapivaraCorp If you really support big op-return, the only way to 100% guarantee it is by running a URSF node. Otherwise, your blockchain risks being wiped out by the BIP110 chain. You'll be completely at the mercy of miners not switching their hashrate to BIP110.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@CapivaraCorp If you really support big op-return, the only way to 100% guarantee it is by running a URSF node. Otherwise, your blockchain risks being wiped out by the BIP110 chain. You'll be completely at the mercy of miners not switching their hashrate to BIP110.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@MajorianBTC Coretards own and heavily censor every other bitcoin venue (r/bitcoin, bitcointalk, the mailing list), so they kind of pushed the free btc discussion to X. If it wasnt for that, I would have no reason to have an X account.

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

How a big miner can multiply their btc in a chaotic split scenario:
- sell your spamcoins for btc in the non spamchain
- switch all your hash rate to mine the non spamchain
- wait for the spamchain wipeout and receive back all your coins
- bonus: short btc to hedge the chaos

[Jimmy Song (송재준) @jimmysong]

https://t.co/cFmFgRT6cm

[Bitcoin Education @biteducation]

@jimmysong Let the shitshow begin. Guess what happens when sellers can't sell their coins on the bip side?