@fixol4all@Anton__BTC No. There is only one Bitcoin chain, which will have RDTS active by September.
If the bad actors want to fork off like Bcash did, they can, but they haven't yet. But their new Bpedo chain wouldn't be Bitcoin, just like Bcash isn't.
They really are trying to define Bitcoin Maximalism as "do all the crypto scams on on Bitcoin instead!"
Rizzo and the Bitcoin Magazine crowd are utterly shameless.
Once you understand that 21 million is not enforced through code, but by culture, you'll understand why redesigning Bitcoin to work better for ETH-style projects is the end.
A friendly reminder to all coretards, that BIP148 activated without initial Core/miner support, at app. 11% UASF nodes.
Run BIP110 !
Rug the spammers !
.@tonevays saying his concern with BIP-110 is centralization whilst saying he "hates the node-in-a-box projects like @start9labs because it means that any idiot can run a node" has me lost for words.
Short clip and followup yesterday from the studio.
When I said Core V30 would increase the attack surface and threat sector to Bitcoin I was attacked.
Now that V30 failed-and resulted in loss of Bitcoin for some-where are those mouthpieces for Core?
Lopp. Calle. Shinobi. Back. Livera.
Remember the "adults in the room" telling us you couldn't trust Knots? Or Luke, or Mechanic.
Now, V30 has been pulled. Failed. 200 developers and yet it released with numerous bugs. One fatal to some legacy wallets.
@LukeDashjr@GrassFedBitcoin@mattkratter@btc_boomers
Whoopsie!
Shitcoin Core™ does it again.
At least they admit it's a bug unlike their other malware changes.
Are they going to fix it using their advanced technique of changing the docs to match the behavior like they did the inscription exploit filter?