Brian Kingston is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association.
Here he lays out quite clearly, “without the U.S. there is no Canadian automotive market”
Diversification is not an option.
He is calling for the Government to stop the Chinese EV agreement as even though 49000 cars seems low, that accounts for 30% of the amount of EV’s sold in Canada each year.
Our Government needs to get their act together, hundreds of thousands of Canadians livelihoods are on the line.
5 minutes worth watching.
💪 POUTINE A RAISON : MÊME LE COMMANDANT SUPRÊME DE L’OTAN EN EUROPE RECONNAÎT QUE LA RUSSIE NE CHERCHE PAS LE CONFLIT ! PAIX MAINTENANT ET LEVÉE DES SANCTIONS ! 🔥
ÉNORME révélation !
Le Général Alexus G. Grynkewich, commandant suprême des forces alliées en Europe, vient de déclarer avec force :
« La Russie ne cherche pas le conflit avec l’OTAN. »
Tout le narratif belliciste s’effondre !
La « menace russe existentielle » était un mensonge des européistes et des atlantistes pour :
- Nous entraîner dans la guerre en Ukraine
- Nous ruiner financièrement
- Créer une « armée européenne » et achever le coup d’État de l’UE
La Russie n’a jamais voulu attaquer l’Europe. Elle a répondu à la provocation du coup d’État de 2014, aux frappes sur le Donbass et à l’expansion de l’OTAN.
Diffusons massivement ! Les médias mainstream ne le feront pas
L'Allemagne a interdit la parution de ce film sur l'immigration massive qui arrive du tiers-monde en Europe, alors @elonmusk l’a publié sur 𝕏 pour que le monde entier puisse le voir.
Au grand désespoir des Libéraux de Mark Chooney.
Partagez-le en grand nombre mais surtout, regardez-le!
* https://t.co/tFINBTM1WS
Lena Evans, Newfoundland Minister of Health is removing parental rights.
She has now banned parents from accessing their children's health records. (Ages 12+).
You protect the LGBT group.
Yet the Carney Liberals want to ban social media under age 16 because kids are not mature enough.
58 JOURS DE VIDE : QUAND UN TIKTOK REMPLACE L'ACTION
Je regarde le dernier « chef-d'œuvre » de communication de Christine Fréchette en train de se la jouer présidente de la République.
58 jours.
Elle répète ce chiffre comme si elle essayait de s'auto-persuader que le temps compense l'absence de résultats.
Fréchette nous joue une pièce de théâtre, mais les Québécois, eux, subissent la tragédie.
Elle dit qu'elle « comprend » que l'épicerie coûte cher.
Quelle condescendance !
Les Québécois, eux, doivent choisir entre payer leur plein d'essence avec l'exclusive taxe carbone ou remplir le frigo.
Les faits sont là.
L'indice des prix à la consommation explose, et pendant qu'elle parle de « virage », les Québécois voient leur pouvoir d'achat se faire massacrer par une inflation qui ne baisse pas, au contraire, les chiffres de mai en sont la preuve.
Elle nous sort ses 10 milliards avec Ottawa.
Elle appelle ça une « victoire ».
La réalité ?
C'est de la poudre aux yeux.
Elle nous remet une partie de l'argent qui, au départ, a été pompé dans les poches des Québécois par des taxes fédérales et elle veut qu'on l'applaudisse pour nous en rendre une fraction.
C'est comme si un voleur te vidait les poches, t'en rendait 20 $ et te demandait de lui dire merci.
Parlons de ses voyages « diplomatiques ».
Elle se promène en France et aux États-Unis pour se bâtir un CV international pendant que les Québécois, eux, sont pris dans un système de santé qui est littéralement en train de mourir.
Elle veut bâtir des partenariats ?
Qu'elle commence par bâtir un système où les Québécois peuvent voir un médecin sans attendre 24 heures sur une chaise en plastique dans un corridor d'urgence.
Elle parle d'aider les PME.
C'est une blague ?
Les entrepreneurs québécois sont étouffés par une bureaucratie qui n'a jamais été aussi lourde et une charge fiscale qui empêche toute croissance réelle.
Elle leur promet du soutien ?
Ils n'ont pas besoin de ses subventions à la petite semaine, ils ont besoin qu'elle leur enlève son pied de dessus leur gorge pour qu'ils puissent enfin respirer.
Elle veut « bâtir l'avenir » ?
La seule chose qu'elle bâtit en ce moment, c'est une muraille entre elle et la population.
C'est ce genre de petites vidéos qui, en toute innocence, réussissent à convaincre les Québécois qu'elle n'était pas ministre sous Legault, ce genre de manipulations qui permettent à Madame de trôner au haut des sondages.
Elle prend les Québécois pour des idiots qui n'ont qu'à voter et payer la note.
Les sondages lui donnent raison.
Regina just became the first Canadian downtown to blast the Muslim call to prayer over public loudspeakers — right across from City Hall.
@BenMulroney said he’s uncomfortable with it. Well Ben…
SO AM I!!
He’s right!! And every Canadian who still gives a damn about this country should be too!!
This isn’t church bells!!
Church bells chime. They don’t repeat “Allah is the greatest” and “There is no god but Allah” five times a day in Arabic for the whole street to hear.
One is neutral sound. The other is a public declaration of religious supremacy and the rejection of every other faith.
Ben nailed the difference. I’ll say it louder:
You want to pray?
Do it in your mosque!
Do it in your home!
Do it quietly like the rest of us!!
But don’t turn our public streets and sidewalks into your personal broadcast system!!!
Canada was built on Judeo-Christian foundations. Not imported megaphone dawah.
This is what “diversity” looks like when it only goes one way — and the people who built this country are expected to sit down and take it.
Enough!!!
Canada First means Canadian streets, Canadian soundscape, and Canadian culture come first.
Not this!!
#cdnpoli #Regina #Saskatchewan #CanadaFirst
DID YOU KNOW?
Trudeau’s refugees are getting a FREE $81,760 a year from the Liberal government?
LET ME SAY THAT AGAIN - FUCKING $80 GRAND!
That’s $20,000 MORE than the average Canadian salary - and it’s tax free!!
Explain to me HOW THE FUCK IS THIS FAIR to all of us who have worked, are working, & continue to work REAL jobs & pay taxes - not sitting on our asses protesting & praying to Allah.
WHY THE FUCK SHOULD WE BE PAYING THIS?
🚨If you share one post today, make sure it’s this one. This is *BEYOND* acceptable🚨
- Petit partage du jour **Idiocracy** (2006).
- Le film qui avait prédit qu’on allait tous devenir très cons.
- On peut dire qu'on s'en rapproche très dangereusement
#Idiocracy#FilmCulte#Filmcomplet
🚨OPERATION SNOWGLOBE
"I BRIBED HILLARY CLINTON
$18M DOLLARS"
Former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne reveals how he worked with the FBI to arrange an $18 million bribe to Hillary Clinton from a foreign government to allow the deep state to control her in 2016.
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WIL BE SHOCKING.
READ HIS MANIFESTO: The Montreal murderer was a Jew-hating Communist censor
The murderer in Montreal has been named: Seth Hatfield, from Alberta. He murdered a policeman in a shooting spree in a Jewish neighbourhood in Montreal.
Soon afterwards, government journalists at the CBC and elsewhere started describing a manifesto that he had left behind. But none of them published the actual document — they just quoted the odd phrase from it, and called him an “incel”. That’s a term for someone who was “involuntarily celibate”, or someone who didn’t do well with women. The usual suspects were doing the media circuit claiming that Hatfield was a “right wing” extremist.
But if that was true, why was the manifesto being shown only to selected, government-friendly journalists? Why were the rest of us blocked from seeing it for ourselves?
Well, that just changed. Rebel News has acquired a copy of the full, 104-page manifesto. You can read it for yourself right here: https://t.co/fAYaqOVZZe
It’s true that the murderer had extreme ideas about women. But that was only a small part of his world view. In most of the rest of his rambling remarks, he was indistinguishable from left-wing politicians like Bernie Sanders, Avi Lewis, or half the Liberal cabinet.
He praised Communism. He called for the abolition of private property. He railed against the Jews, and Zionism. And — like Mark Carney himself — he demanded the censorship of the Internet.
Read the manifesto of a crazed, left-wing extremist.
And never forget: the mainstream media lies to you about everything important.
Mark Carney pris en flagrant délit.
Pendant une rencontre avec le premier ministre croate Andrej Plenkovic, Mark Carney a été capté sur micro chaud en train de dire que ses propres députés ne sont « utiles que pour les votes ».
Il aurait aussi fait une remarque sur ses ministres du Cabinet.
Ça en dit long sur le respect qu’il a pour la démocratie parlementaire et pour les élus qui sont censés le représenter…
Imaginez ce qu’il doit dire en privé sur les Canadiens ordinaires.
Ça se passe à Brampton, en Ontario dans « votre » Canada!
C’est dans la région de Toronto, là où il y a beaucoup de tensions entre communautés sikhes, surtout autour des temples.
La vidéo montre un groupe de barbus avec des turbans équipé d’épées et de sabres, qui bloque des voitures en criant je ne sais quoi dans un charabia qui ressemble à la diarrhée d’un lendemain de brosse.
Elbows Up Ô Canada!
*
Ezra Levant: Thanks to floor crossers, Carney can now ram through his spy bill
Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill.
The answer? It is a direct assault on parliamentary democracy and your freedoms.
Last year, Mark Carney won the election with just 43 percent of the vote. That delivered him 169 seats out of 343 in the House of Commons, three short of the 172 needed for a majority. Canadians deliberately gave him a minority government. Sometimes voters do that on purpose, wanting to keep a politician on a shorter leash and force him to work with Parliament rather than dominate it.
But Carney was not content with the verdict of the electorate. While the political establishment spent years warning that Donald Trump might refuse to accept election results, Carney set about changing his own. By persuading a string of opposition MPs to cross the floor, he secured the majority Canadians had declined to give him at the ballot box.
The obvious question is why? Justin Trudeau governed for nearly a decade without a formal majority, relying on NDP support to pass budgets and survive confidence votes. There was little reason to believe Carney could not have done the same.
Ezra’s answer is that Carney wanted something more than legislative support. He wanted the ability to shut down parliamentary scrutiny itself.
That is now on full display.
Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The legislation would compel technology companies to retain user data for up to a year and make that information available to government authorities. Civil liberties advocates have raised serious concerns about privacy, government overreach and the expansion of state surveillance powers.
The concerns are hardly theoretical. Canadians have already witnessed a government willing to freeze bank accounts and invoke extraordinary powers during the trucker protests. Mark Carney himself, while living in Europe at the time, wrote in The Globe and Mail that Ottawa should take a harder line against convoy participants and their supporters. It is therefore not surprising that critics view Bill C-22 as part of a broader push toward greater state control.
What makes the situation particularly troubling is not only the substance of the legislation but the manner in which it is being advanced.
The government has introduced a motion declaring that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-22 will be pushed through Parliament on an accelerated timetable. In plain English, the normal rules are being set aside.
Committee members will have just 30 minutes to complete clause-by-clause consideration of the bill. Any remaining amendments will be deemed moved and voted upon without further debate. The legislation will then move rapidly through report stage and third reading with strictly limited speaking time for opposition parties and virtually no opportunity for extended scrutiny.
For a bill that constitutes one of the most significant expansions of government surveillance powers in Canadian history, Parliament is being afforded remarkably little time to examine the details.
Professor Michael Geist, one of Canada’s leading experts on technology law and digital policy, has publicly criticized the government’s approach. Geist argues that hearings are being cut short, amendments are being rushed through without proper discussion, and the public is being denied the transparency normally expected during the legislative process. His warning is not about partisan politics but about the erosion of parliamentary accountability.
This is why Carney needed those extra seats.
The issue is not merely that opposition MPs crossed the floor. It is what those additional seats are now being used to accomplish. This is a double violation of democratic principles: first, altering the balance of Parliament after voters had already spoken; and second, using that altered balance to restrict Parliament’s ability to debate, amend and scrutinize legislation.
The implications extend beyond a single bill. Across Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia, governments are increasingly embracing online surveillance measures, age-verification requirements and expanded regulatory control over digital spaces. These initiatives are almost always presented as necessary protections for children or public safety, yet they also require citizens to surrender more privacy and give governments more information about their online activities.
It is a stark contrast to the vision of technological progress championed by figures such as Elon Musk, who promote innovation, space exploration, artificial intelligence and the expansion of human potential. One approach sees technology as a tool of freedom and advancement. The other increasingly treats it as something to be monitored, regulated and controlled.
This is what an unchecked majority can look like under Mark Carney: Parliament reduced to a rubber stamp, debate curtailed, privacy placed at risk and major legislation rushed through with minimal scrutiny.
Canadians deserve better.
The democratic process only matters if it is respected when it becomes inconvenient. If Parliament is no longer permitted to properly examine legislation, question witnesses or challenge the government of the day, then the institution itself is diminished. That should concern every Canadian regardless of political affiliation.
🇨🇦 «On se fait attaquer par Santé Canada. Le Canada est le seul pays au monde qui bloque la vente de chambres hyperbares à basse pression... On est au courant de ce qui se passe chez vous et on a bien hâte d'aller l'exposer à des juges.» -@NicolasTetrault