Bjarke Tønnesen

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@bnielson01 @Sam_kuyp Feynman’s lectures in physics are like that. As I recall he goes through very basic problems like how to measure distance.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@Atom2384 @BennyChugg That makes more sense, thanks.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@Atom2384 @BennyChugg Interesting. I don’t get the Dwarkesh argument. The fact that we have motorcycles makes it a weird choice of analogy.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@BennyChugg @bnielson01 As far as I can tell most of his objections stem from common misunderstandings of Popper and Deutsch that have already been cleared up by @bnielson01 in his podcast.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@BennyChugg Please do an episode about it, preferably with @bnielson01.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@freddiejevans_ @Domestique___ No? Which is why Jonas did the second best climb of all time. Only beaten by Pogi.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@medicinexthings Big difference between S16 and S7. Vingegaard’s plan is always to wear Pogi down and beat him in the third week.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@dela3499 Sure! Will listen to the first one first. But maybe something about the relation between knowledge and morality? Like, how can we say that something is immoral?

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@dela3499 Sounds great. Always enjoy your work!

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@HansenKenn Det kan være jeg misforstod dig. Læste det som et angreb mod hendes person/intellekt/dannelse.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@HansenKenn Tal ordentligt. Respektér hendes synspunkt. Er du uenig, så kritisér det, i stedet for hendes person.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@Tratnikstan @cycletips123 How do you get to be disappointed? He clearly beat your expectations of him. You said he would be dropped and not be in the first group. You thought Skujins was gonna be better placed than Mads. You must be very surprised that he even got to 4th and got to sprint for the win.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@metaLulie Persons are inherently valuable if not for anything else then for their capacity as creative, universal explainers. Or their capacity to love.

One can be inherently valuable and also be more valuable than someone else so the relativity of value is not relevant.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@Velocipeden @FrederikIngema1 Jeg tror ikke, UAE tillader, at han ikke kører Tour.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@JohannesenLind @kristianleth Helt enig. Man kan dog sige at riffet i JJF og Satisfaction er meget ens. Jeg savner også Get Off of My Cloud, Play with Fire, Sweet Virginia, Let it Loose og Beast of Burden.

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@StatsOnCycling No pogacar crash in LBL?

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@dela3499 @noa_lange @mayfer Not exactly what you’re looking for, but Bernstein’s Harvard lectures about why and how music *works* are so good. https://t.co/CwfMAPt9Kq

[Bjarke Tønnesen @BjarkeStats]

@Nicobisgaard @BetXpert Ok, tak!