Here’s the MOST damning part if Andrew Wilson’s disastrous Candace Owens debate. Here he 100% contradicts himself & unwittingly reveals he doesn’t believe anything he’s saying & it’s all a con.
Andrew’s opening statement:
“I think it’s ghoulish to profit off the death of a good man”
He then reads a text he says Charlie Kirk sent the night before in which Charlie says he’s afraid the “Left is going to kill him”
He’s asked to show the text to the audience but Andrew refuses BUT says he’s will show it on his show.
When asked why he won’t show it to the audience during the debate but only show it on his own show he says:
“ You gotta drip out that evidence to keep people coming back to the show”
So he unwittingly admits it’s to “profit off of the death of a good man” by using Charlie’s text for views & money.
And there you have it. His whole appearance is a Con. He doesn’t believe anything he says, he’s a clout chasing phony who is the opposite of what he claims to be. And he just accidentally told on himself.
@IanCarrollShow@nick_matau Holy smokes people are in disbelief that someone could be thinking about possibilities and claim theyre going back on claims.
They act as tho they know exactly what happened and if anyone makes attempt to theorize they are crazy. 🤷♂️
@PinoAmericano Right.
She's the one exploiting his death.....
I feel like after watching a couple eps or listening to the words out of her mouth she just doesnt trust the government or the lying liers that lie. Maybe she just wants to know who killed her friend. 🤷♂️