No one is forcing you to stay at that soul-crushing job,” yes they are.
The threat of rent, bills, and homelessness is extremely coercive. Stop pretending choice exists in this setup.
Keir Starmer has gone — but we will never forget the role his government played in the greatest crime of our time.
Today, I re-presented my Bill for an independent inquiry into Britain’s complicity in genocide.
The man in the picture is Peter Lynch. During the protests that took place after the events in Southport a few years ago, Peter was arrested and fast-tracked into prison for simply raising his voice at the police.
He was 61 years old and sentenced to nearly three years in prison. He ended up taking his own life.
This was on Starmer.
Don't tell me Starmer is a "decent" and "nice" man because he got a bit teary eyed while reading from a predictable, pathetic script about focusing on being a good husband and father.
I just find this social strategy sort of pathetic.
@DoorDash is intentionally tagging @TPAIN in their tweets about the World Cup in an effort to ~get attention~, and they did it to the point where T-Pain had to publicly ask the brand to stop.
The attempted gag: New Zealand has a player named Tim Payne, so DoorDash “accidentally” tagged T-Pain instead. And T-Pain’s energy went from LOL to “stop tagging me” within a few tweets.
There’s a number of reasons this is a baddd idea.
1. It wouldn’t be hard to argue DoorDash is using T-Pain’s name, image, and likeness without his consent. It’s obviously a stunt to promote DoorDash.
2. It’s giving “celebrities aren’t people” energy. It’s fundamentally weird for a brand to bug another human being just for attention, celeb or not.
2. If T-Pain is in on the bit, this would most definitely be unmarked influencer content, which would be a huge FTC fine.
3. Yeah, it’s gonna go viral, but does the virality have literally anything to do with why we’d use DoorDash? No. But do the risks outweigh the rewards? Also no.
It genuinely is not that hard to be good at social media while staying ethical, not actively bothering celebrities, and making content about what your company actually does.
The elevation of Burnham is probably the most obvious spook coordinated game-plays I have ever seen in British politics (possibly more obvious, even, than the suiciding of David Kelly). There is not a scintilla of credibility left in British democracy. If anyone even suggests that this choreographed bullshit bears any relationship to 'truth', call them out. Because they're part of the problem.